Advertisement

Technology Education in Saudi Arabia in Comparison with New Zealand: Lessons for Technology Education Teachers

  • Abbad Almutairi
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

This research sought to obtain a deeper insight into technology education implementation in New Zealand and Saudi Arabia in order to explore how this subject is implemented in both contexts that leads to the identification of the similarities and differences between them. A qualitative approach was used in the main but supported by a qualitative approach in the Saudi context. Data were obtained from document analysis, interviews with technology teachers and technology experts, observations of practice, and questionnaires. The findings indicate that there were significant differences in implementing the two subjects in both contexts, particularly in terms of practice. Limited similarities between them were also found.

This study aims to provide teachers with new data gained from research about different aspects of technology education, namely, curriculum planning, teaching methods, assessment for learning, and student engagement, that might help teachers to improve teaching and learning in the technology education classroom.

References

  1. Al-Ghamdi, M. (2012). Content evaluation of the developed primary science curriculum in Saudi Arabia. (Master’s thesis), Um-Alqura University: Makkah.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Ghamdi, A., & Al-Salouli, M. (2013). Saudi elementary science teachers’ beliefs: Teaching science in the new millennium. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 501–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almutairi, A., Everatt, J., Snape, P., & Turnbull, W. (2014). Exploring the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 1, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryman, A. (1988). Quantity and quality in social research. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  5. Cajas, F., & Gallagher, J. (2011). The interdependence of scientific and technological literacy. Journal of Research in Science Education, 38(7), 713–714.Google Scholar
  6. Compton, V. (2004). The relationship between science and technology: Discussion document prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Education Curriculum Project. Retrieved from www.tki.org.nzcurriculum/whats_happening/index_e.php
  7. De Vries, M. (2001). The history of industrial research laboratories as a resource for teaching about science-technology relationships. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Vries, M. (2012). International curricula requirements for making connections in science and technology education. In B. France & V. Compton (Eds.), Bringing communities together: Connecting learners with scientists or technologists (pp. 43–59). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fath-Allah, M. (2006). Teaching technology in general schools (1st ed.). Riyadh: Alsomaie House.Google Scholar
  10. Gravemeijer, K., & Baartman, L. (2011). Science and technology education for the future. In M. De Vries, H. Keulen, S. Peters, & W. der Molen (Eds.), Professional development for primary teachers in science and technology (pp. 22–33). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  11. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers’ perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kipperman, D. (2006). Science and technology links in Israeli secondary schools: Do we have a reason to celebrate? In M. De Vries & I. Mottier (Eds.), International handbook of technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 487–497). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  14. Lebeaume, J. (2011). Between technology education and science education: A necessary positioning. In M. De Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 75–86). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ministry of Education. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  16. Ministry of Education. (2007a). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.Google Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education (2007b). Technology curriculum support: A package of documents and papers developed by the Ministry of Education to support schools and teachers with the implementation of the technology curriculum in the New Zealand Curriculum (2007). Retrieved from www.techlink.org.nz/curriculum-support
  18. Ministry of Education (TKI). Technology online: indicators of progression. Retrieved from http://technology.tki.org.nz/Technology-in-the-NZC/Indicators-of-progression
  19. Morgan, D. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative Approaches (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sparkes, J. (1993). Some differences between science and technology. In R. McCormick, C. Newey, & J. Sarkes (Eds.), Technology for technology education (pp. 25–36). Padstow: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand Curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turnbull, W. (2013). The nature of conversation of primary students in technology education implications for teaching and learning. PhD thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abbad Almutairi
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of Education, Center for Education Polices ResearchesRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations