Advertisement

The Impact of Mobile Devices on Self-Directed Learning and Achievement

  • Scott R. BartholomewEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

As mobile devices have become increasingly ubiquitous in society, the potential for impacting student learning in classroom settings has been the subject of debate. Instant information access and collaboration have been mentioned as potential benefits of mobile device access. However, the potential for mobile devices to foster self-directed learning in students and improve student achievement on open-ended design problems has not been explored. Therefore, this chapter presents the findings from research with middle school students working in small groups on an engineering design challenge. The findings explore the relationships between access to mobile devices, student achievement, and student self-directed learning.

References

  1. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392/515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elder, J. (2009). OMG! Teachers say texting can be good for teens. Retrieved from http://www.ocmboces.org/tfiles/folder889/Cell%20Phones%20in%20Schools%20Binder1.pdf
  3. Fahnoe, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Do 21st century learning environments support self-directed learning? Middle school students’ response to an intentionally designed learning environment. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2013 (pp. 3131–3139). Chesapeake: AACE.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Haywood, K. (2011). The NMC horizon report: 2011 K-12 edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium Retrieved from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2011-Horizon-Report-K12.pdf.Google Scholar
  5. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall/Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y. J., & Lim, M. H. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K-12 education from 2007 to present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lloyd, J. (2010). Cell phones head to class. Retrieved from http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/education/article/Cell-phones-head-to-class-780555.php
  8. Mitchell, L. (2014). Rise of the YouTube makeup artist: Nearly half of women use online tutorials. Express. Retrieved from http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/style/464633/Pixiwoo-Lauren-Curtis-Frozen-Nearly-half-of-women-copy-popular-online-makeup-tutorials
  9. O’Bannon, B., & Thomas, K. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Preservice teachers answer the call. Computers & Education, 85, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pew Research Center. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewInternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/
  11. Prensky, M. (2007, July–August). Changing paradigms. Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-ChangingParadigms-01-EdTech.pdf
  12. Quillen, I. (2010). Schools open doors to students’ mobile devices. Digital directions. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/dd/articles/2010/10/20/01mobile.h04.html
  13. Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual of qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Schenker, L. (2009). Schools embrace txt msg. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved on September 24, 2014 from: http://www.sltrib.com/education/ci_12179870
  15. Teo, T. (2013). An initial development and validation of a digital natives assessment scale (DNAS). Computers & Education, 67, 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teo, T., Tan, S. C., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Chen, W. L., & Cheah, H. M. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1764–1771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations