Numerical Overview of Fiscal Cyclicality

  • Toshihiro IhoriEmail author
  • Keigo Kameda
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)


Recently, some research has demonstrated that a fiscal policy runs procyclically in most developing countries. Preceding studies have proposed two explanations for this: (i) imperfection in international credit markets that prevents developing countries from borrowing during bad times and (ii) political distortion to accelerate fiscal expansion during bad times. In this chapter, we review preceding empirical literature and summarize important points to be considered. The theoretical literature will be surveyed in the next chapter. Then, we analyze fiscal cyclicality by ourselves while considering these points. Our three types of simple analyses show the following: (i) fiscal procyclicality does exist, even if we carefully address the causality problem; (ii) not only developing countries but also some industrialized countries may implement fiscal policies procyclically; and (iii) the possibility of a procyclical fiscal policy is higher when the government function is weak.


Procyclical fiscal policy Data frequency Causality Functioning of government 


  1. Alesina, A., Campante, F., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Why is fiscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizenman, J., Gavin, M., & Hausmann, R. (1996). Optimal tax and debt policy with endogenously imperfect creditworthiness. NBER Working Paper, No. 5558.Google Scholar
  3. Aizenman, J., Gavin, M., & Hausmann, R. (2000). Optimal tax and debt policy with endogenously imperfect creditworthiness. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 9(4), 367–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro, R. (1979). On the determination of public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 940–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carneiro, F., & Garrido, L. (2015). New evidence on the cyclicality of fiscal policy. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series, Working Paper, No. 7293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Égert, B. (2010). Fiscal policy reaction to the cycle in the OECD: Pro- or counter-cyclical? OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 763.Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, J. A., Végh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2013). On graduation from fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 11–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gavin, M., Hausmann, R., Perotti, R., & Talvi, E. (1996). Managing fiscal policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, procyclicality and limited creditworthiness. Inter-American Development Bank Office of the Chief Economist Working Paper, No. 326.Google Scholar
  11. Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics, 12(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., & Rosen, H. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Eonometrica, 56(6), 1371–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilzetzki, E. (2011). Rent-seeking distortions and fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ilzetzki, E., & Végh, C. A. (2008). Procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries: Truth or fiction? NBER Working Paper, No. 14191.Google Scholar
  15. Jaimovich, D., & Panizza, U. (2007). Procyclicality or reverse causality? Inter-American Development Bank Research Department Working Paper, No. 599.Google Scholar
  16. Kaminsky, G., Reinhart, C., & Végh, C. A. (2004). When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 19, 11–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kekic, L. (2007). The economist intelligence unit’s index of democracy.
  18. Lane, P. R. (2003). The cyclical behaviour of fiscal policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2661–2675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manasse, P. (2006). Procyclical fiscal policy: Shocks, rules, and institutions—A view from MARS. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Riascos, A., & Végh, C. A. (2003). Procyclical government spending in developing countries: The role of capital market imperfections. UCLA and Banco Republica, Colombia: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  21. Stein, E., Talvi, E., & Gristani, A. (1999). Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: The Latin American experience. NBER Working Paper, No. 6358.Google Scholar
  22. Talvi, E., & Végh, C. (2000). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy. NBER Working Paper, No. 7499.Google Scholar
  23. Talvi, E., & Végh, C. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tornell, A., & Lane, P. R. (1999). The voracity effect. American Economic Review, 89(1), 22–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Végh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2015). How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3), 327–370.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Development Bank of Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Graduate Institute for Policy StudiesMinato-kuJapan
  2. 2.Kwansei Gakuin UniversitySandaJapan
  3. 3.Research Institute of Capital FormationDevelopment Bank of JapanChiyoda-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations