Advertisement

Diversity and Equity in Singapore Education: Parental Involvement in Low-Income Families with Migrant Mothers

  • Siao See TengEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education Innovation Series book series (EDIN)

Abstract

With its prominence as one of the top-performing systems on international tests such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), Singapore’s education system is often regarded as a reputed one in the international arena. This is often seen as a result of much investment in education both at the individual family and the societal level. Having transformed from an underdeveloped country to a largely middle-class developed society within a few decades, education is seen as holding the meritocratic key to a better life. With increased literacy, wealth and fewer children in families over the 50 years of Singapore’s independence, parents focus on more spending and efforts on supporting their children. However, in recent years, there has been a rising concern that the meritocratic promise the Singapore’s education system holds is diminishing (Koh, Doing class analysis in Singapore’s elite education: unravelling the smokescreen of ‘meritocratic talk’. Glob Soc Educ 12(2):196–210, 2014). Growing income disparity in Singapore has led to concerns about an emerging “parentocracy” (Ong, Beware growing ‘parentocracy’: NIE don. The Straits Times. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/beware-growing-parentocracy-nie-don, 2014). Children from better-off families are seen as having competitive advantages through their parents’ ability to provide better resources such as quality private supplementary education and/or even old school connections to enable their enrolment in prestigious schools. With greater globalization and demographic trends in recent years, understanding the needs of Singapore’s diversified low-income families becomes even more crucial in order to better support students from these families so as to mitigate the ills of “parentocracy”. This chapter aims to contribute to the knowledge on the profile and parents’ educational support of low-income families through a study on migrant mothers’ involvement in their Singapore citizen children’s education. It attempts to throw some light on who these families are, the kind of parents’ educational support offered to these students and the challenges faced in rendering that support.

References

  1. Baquedano-Lopez, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, W. M. (2004). Parent involvement in elementary school and educational attainment. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P. (1990). The ‘third wave’: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davie, S., & Chew, M. (2012, November 17). PSLE the cause of lacking student diversity. The Straits Times. Retrieved from http://www.asiaone.com/print/News/Latest%2BNews/Edvantage/Story/A1Story20121117-384073.html
  6. Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. London: Department of Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  7. DeWiele, C. E. B., & Edgerton, J. D. (2016). Parentocracy revisited: Still a relevant concept for understanding middle class educational advantage? Interchange, 47(2), 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Domina, T. (2005). Leveling the home advantage: Assessing the effectiveness of parental involvement in elementary school. Sociology of Education, 78, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parents’ reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. Elementary School Journal, 86, 227–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, J. L. (1990). School and family connections: Theory, research, and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family. Marriage and Family Review, 15(1–2), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, J. L. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feuerstein, A. (2000). School characteristics and parent involvement: Influences on participation in children’s schools. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanafin, J., & Lynch, A. (2002). Peripheral voices: Parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research, 50(3), 227–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera, L., & Noguera, P. (2013). The education of Latino students in New York. In A. Falcon (Ed.), Latinos in New York in the 21st century. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Heymann, S. J., & Earle, A. (2000). Low-income parents: How do working conditions affect their opportunity to help school-age children at risk? American Educational Research Journal, 37, 833–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hong, W. P. (2010). Multicultural education in Korea: Its development, remaining issues, and global implications. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Whitaker, M. C., & Ice, C. L. (2010). Motivation and commitment to family-school partnerships. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Horvat, E. M., Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsin, C.-T. (2011). Active agents: The new-immigrant mothers’ figured worlds of home literacy practices for young children in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, K., & Remillard, J. (2005). Rethinking parent involvement: African American mothers construct their roles in the mathematics education of their children. School Community Journal, 15(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
  23. Khong, L. (2004). Family matters: The role of parents in Singapore education. Singapore, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Koh, A. (2014). Doing class analysis in Singapore’s elite education: Unravelling the smokescreen of ‘meritocratic talk’. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(2), 196–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lareau, A. (1989). Family-school relationships: A view from the classroom. Educational Policy, 3, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Lareau, A., & Weininger, E. (2004). Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society, 32, 567–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawson, M. A. (2003). School-family relations in context: Parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Education, 38(1), 77–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, H. L. (2011). Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the debate on the President’s address, 20 October 2011 at Parliament. Singapore, Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office.Google Scholar
  30. Li, R., & Hu, G. (2011). A comparative study of family social capital and literacy practices in Singapore. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 0(0), 1–33.Google Scholar
  31. Lightfoot, D. (2004). “Some parents don’t care”: Decoding the meanings of parent involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manzon, M., Miller, R., Hong, H., & Khong, L. (2015). Parent engagement in education (NIE Working Paper Series No.7). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  33. Mapp, K. L. (2003). Having their say: Parents describe why and how they are engaged in their children’s learning. School Community Journal, 13(1), 35–64.Google Scholar
  34. Mapp, K. L., & Hong, S. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach parent. In S. L. Christenson & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Mo, L. L., & Lai, P. L. (2004). A preliminary study of problems due the low birth rate and the increasing number of children of non-national parents in Taiwan. Quarterly Journal of Community Development, 105, 55–65.Google Scholar
  36. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory in Practice, 31, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Population Secretariat. (2009). An occasional paper on marriages between Singapore citizens and non-Singapore citizens 1998–2008. Singapore, Singapore: NPS.Google Scholar
  38. Ong, A. (2014, March 30). Beware growing ‘parentocracy’: NIE don. The Straits Times. Retrieved May 24, 2015, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/beware-growing-parentocracy-nie-don
  39. Sanders, M. G., Epstein, J. L., & Connors-Tadros, L. C. (1999). Family partnerships with high schools: The parents’ perspective. Baltimore: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk (CRESPAR), Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, J. G. (2006). Parental involvement in education among low-income families: A case study. The School Community Journal, 16(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  41. Swap, S. M. (1993). Developing home-school partnerships: From concepts to practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tan, C. Y. (2013). Theoretical discussion on forms of cultural capital. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(2), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Teo, Y. Y. (2018). This is what inequality looks like. Singapore, Singapore: Ethos Books.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, L.-Y., Teng, S. S., & Tan, C. S. (2014). Levelling up academically low progress students (NIE Working Paper Series No. 3). Singapore, Singapore: National Institute of Singapore.Google Scholar
  45. Weiss, M. G., & Liss, M. B. (1988). Night shift work: Job and family concerns. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3(4), 279–286.Google Scholar
  46. Weiss, H. B., Mayer, E., & Kreider, H. (2003). Making it work: Low-income working mother’s involvement in their children’s education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 879–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiss, H. B., Bouffard, S. M., Bridglall, B. L., & Gordon, E. W. (2009). Reframing family involvement in education: Supporting families to support educational equity. New York: Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  48. West, A., Noden, P., Edge, A., & David, M. (1998). Parental involvement in education in and out of school. British Educational Research Journal, 24(4), 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yuen, S. (2018, February 5). Parliament: Number of student care centres in schools has tripled since 2012. The Straits Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/parliament-number-of-student-care-centres-in-schools-has-tripled-since-2012

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of EducationNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations