Oilfield Chemistry pp 291-312 | Cite as
Corrosion and Anti-corrosion of Buried Pipeline
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
The corrosion of buried pipeline is generated by its contact with soil. Soil corrosion is mainly related to the properties of the soil water. In this chapter, three corrosion reactions are introduced, including the corrosion generated when soil water contains oxygen, the corrosion generated when soil water contains acid gas, and the corrosion generated by bacteria in soil. Generally, anti-corrosion coating method and cathodic protection method are employed to reduce the corrosion of buried steel pipeline in the soil. Detained introduction to these two methods is given in this chapter.
References
- Bagnulo L (1985) Method of corrosion protection. US Patent 4,496,444, 29 Jan 1985Google Scholar
- Cao B (2006) Discussion on the selection of sacrificial anode sets in buried steel pipeline. Oil Gas Storage Transp 25(6):24–26, 30Google Scholar
- Chen S (1995) Paint process (updated version) first fascicle. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 1–20Google Scholar
- Feehan CE, Wagner EF (1977) Polyethylene coating for ferrous metals. US Patent 4,007,298, 8 Feb 1977Google Scholar
- Gay PJ (1975) Cathodic protection. US Patent 3,868,313, 25 Feb 1975Google Scholar
- Guo J, Wei C, Du X (2009) Development and new technology of pipeline coating. Pipeline Tech Equip 5:49–51Google Scholar
- Hielema R (1974) Pipe coating method. US Patent 3,823,045, 19 July 1974Google Scholar
- Hu S, Xu K, Wang W (1984) The make-in-research and application of Magnesium-base sacrifice anode. Oil Gas Storage Transp 3(4):37–41Google Scholar
- Huang H, Liu Y (2009) Cathodic protection technology and its application to buried steel pipeline. Pipeline Tech Equip (2):46–48, 51Google Scholar
- Jost JW, Ghandehari MH (1986) Corrosion protection with sacrificial anodes. US Patent 4,626,329, 2 Dec 1986Google Scholar
- Liu G (2007) Application of cathodic protection technology. Corros Prot Petrochem Ind 23(6):58–61Google Scholar
- Liu J, Wang W, Ma J (2006) Corrosion mechanisms of buried pipelines and countermeasures. Corros & Prot Petrochem Ind 23(6):20–22Google Scholar
- Liu P, Chen B, Guo D et al (2008) The origin and protect-ion research of the buried oil pipeline to corrode. Pipeline Tech Equip 4:47–48Google Scholar
- Moreland PJ, De Peuter FLJ (1995) Cathodic protection system and a coating and coating composition therefore. US Patent 5,431,795, 11 July 1995Google Scholar
- Ni Y (1994) Practical anti-corrosion techniques. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 195–209Google Scholar
- Norsworthy R (1998) Coating proves effective on hot pipelines. Pipeline Gas J 225(3):44–45, 48Google Scholar
- Oertel G (1985) Polyurethane handbook. Hanser Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Torossian KA, Markovitz M, Cox FE (1986) Unique epoxy resin compositions and composite molded bodies filled therewith. US Patent 4,631,230, 23 Dec 1986Google Scholar
- Tran BT, Toerner TJ, Titus PE (1996) Polymer concrete coating for pipe, tubular shapes, other metal members and metal structures. US Patent 5,573,855, 12 Nov 1996Google Scholar
- Wang Y, Sun J (2007) External anticorrosive techniques on buried pipelines//China Petroleum and Natural Gas Co., Ltd. Xinjiang Oil Field Branch. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, pp 326–329Google Scholar
- Wang K, Wu J (1993) The development of soil corrosion mechanism and research technology. Prog Soil Sci 21(4):10–14Google Scholar
- Wang C, Pang Y, Li B (2009) Selection and installation of sacrificial anodes materials. Pipeline Tech Equip 1:59–60Google Scholar
- Wu J (1991) Effects of soil properties on electrode potential of steel in soils. Acta Pedologica Sinica 28(2):117–123Google Scholar
- Xiao J (1994) Corrosion introduction—corrosion of materials and control methods. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 284–296Google Scholar
- Yang Y (2005) Anti-corrosion progress of steel pipes. Petrochem Pipeline 28(3):39–40Google Scholar
- Yang J, Ma G, Zhang Y et al (2005) Selection and application on external coating of long-distance pipelines. Xinjiang Pet Sci & Technol 15(2):46–49Google Scholar
- Yu Z (1996) Paint process (updated version) second fascicle. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 496–497Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and China University of Petroleum Press 2018