Advertisement

Introduction

  • Toshiyuki Kobayashi
  • Birgit Speh
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mathematics book series (LNM, volume 2234)

Abstract

A representation Π of a group G defines a representation of a subgroup G′ by restriction.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many of the results were obtained while the authors were supported by the Research in Pairs program at the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut MFO in Oberwolfach, Germany.

Research by the first author was partially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (25247006) and (18H03669), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Research by the second author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1500644. Part of this research was conducted during a visit of the second author at the Graduate School of Mathematics of The University of Tokyo, Komaba. She would like to thank it for its support and hospitality during her stay.

References

  1. 8.
    R. Beuzart-Plessis, A local trace formula for the Gan–Gross–Prasad conjecture for unitary groups: the archimedean case. ArXiv:1506.01452Google Scholar
  2. 11.
    D.H. Collingwood, Representations of Rank One Lie Groups. Res. Notes in Math., vol. 137 (Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985), vii+244 pp.Google Scholar
  3. 12.
    W.T. Gan, B.H. Gross, D. Prasad, J.-L. Waldspurger, Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad. I, in Astérique, vol. 346 (Soc. Math. France, 2012), xi+318 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    B.H. Gross, D. Prasad, On the decomposition of a representations of SOn when restricted to SOn−1. Can. J. Math. 44, 974–1002 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 15.
    B.H. Gross, N. Wallach, Restriction of small discrete series representations to symmetric subgroups, in The Mathematical Legacy of Harish-Chandra, Baltimore, MD, 1998. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 68 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2000), pp. 255–272Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    A. Juhl, Families of Conformally Covariant Differential Operators, Q-Curvature and Holography. Progr. Math., vol. 275 (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2009)Google Scholar
  7. 22.
    A.W. Knapp, E.M. Stein, Intertwining operators for semisimple groups. Ann. Math. (2) 93, 489–578 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 28.
    T. Kobayashi, Discrete decomposability of the restriction of \(A_{\mathfrak {q}}(\lambda )\) with respect to reductive subgroups. III. Restriction of Harish-Chandra modules and associated varieties. Invent. Math. 131, 229–256 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002220050203
  9. 33.
    T. Kobayashi, A program for branching problems in the representation theory of real reductive groups, in Representations of Lie Groups. In Honor of David A. Vogan, Jr. on his 60th Birthday. Progr. Math., vol. 312 (Birkhäuser, 2015), pp. 277–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23443-4_10
  10. 35.
    T. Kobayashi, T. Kubo, M. Pevzner, Conformal Symmetry Breaking Operators for Differential Forms on Spheres. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 2170 (Springer, 2016), iv+192 pp. ISBN: 978-981-10-2657-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2657-7
  11. 36.
    T. Kobayashi, T. Matsuki, Classification of finite-multiplicity symmetric pairs. Transform. Groups 19, 457–493 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00031-014-9265-x. Special issue in honor of Dynkin for his 90th birthdayMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 38.
    T. Kobayashi, B. Ørsted, P. Somberg, V. Souček, Branching laws for Verma modules and applications in parabolic geometry. I. Adv. Math. 285, 1796–1852 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2015.08.020 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 39.
    T. Kobayashi, T. Oshima, Finite multiplicity theorems for induction and restriction. Adv. Math. 248, 921–944 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2013.07.015 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 42.
    T. Kobayashi, B. Speh, Symmetry Breaking for Representations of Rank One Orthogonal Groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 238 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2015), v+112 pp. ISBN: 978-1-4704-1922-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/memo/1126 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 44.
    B. Kostant, Verma modules and the existence of quasi-invariant differential operators, in Non-commutative Harmonic Analysis, Marseille–Luminy, 1974. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 466 (Springer, Berlin, 1975), pp. 101–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 45.
    M. Krämer, Multiplicity free subgroups of compact connected Lie groups. Arch. Math. (Basel) 27, 28–36 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 51.
    C. Mœglin, J.-L. Waldspurger, Sur les conjectures de Gross et Prasad. II, in Astérique, vol. 347 (Soc. Math. France, 2012)Google Scholar
  18. 54.
    B. Sun, The nonvanishing hypothesis at infinity for Rankin–Selberg convolutions. J. Am. Math. Soc. 30, 1–25 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 55.
    B. Sun, C.-B. Zhu, Multiplicity one theorems: the Archimedean case. Ann. Math. (2) 175, 23–44 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.4007/annals.2012.175.1.2 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 62.
    N.R. Wallach, Real Reductive Groups. I. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 132 (Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1988), xx+412 pp. ISBN: 0-12-732960-9; II, ibid, vol. 132-II (Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1992), xiv+454 pp. ISBN: 978-0127329611Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshiyuki Kobayashi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Birgit Speh
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Mathematical SciencesThe University of TokyoKomabaJapan
  2. 2.Kavli IPMUKashiwaJapan
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations