The Synchronicity of Art and Mathematics

  • Gregory JohnsonEmail author


This chapter is a discussion of the premise that there is a correlation between art and mathematics from an instructional as well as a practical aspect. The premise is supported by analysis of the mathematical framework of visual art and review of historical and contemporary empirical research into the linkage of disciplines. The chapter contains historical evidence and discussion of cultural bias as well as anecdotal observation of the author’s artwork. The conclusion is that art can be used as a tool in understanding quadratics, abstract principles, and the relationship of geometry to real-world potentialities. STEAM is a modern designation of the developing human educational models understanding its natural cultural significance through art can make it more accessible. Recognizing the legitimacy of art in an interdisciplinary setting is important in establishing an egalitarian connection to STEAM learning. Art is a means to making this connection and demystifying mathematics as separate from the mundane or as a product of the elite.


  1. Bruno Ernst, B. (1976). The magic mirror of M.C. Escher (pp. 40–41). New York: Harry Abrams.Google Scholar
  2. D’Ambrosio, U. (1977). Science and technology in Latin America during the discovery. Impact of Science on Society, UNESCO, 27(3), 267–274.Google Scholar
  3. D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics link between traditions and modernity (English Translation). Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, D. (1997). On a tiling scheme from MC Escher. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 4(2), #23.Google Scholar
  5. Escher, G. A. (1986). Potato printing, a game for winter evenings. In H. S. M. Coexeter, M. Emmer, R. Penrose, & M. Teuber (Eds.), M. C. Escher: Art and science (pp. 9–11). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Hein, E. (2011). Visualizing music posted at Scholar
  7. Kandinsky, W. (1947). Point and Line to Plane, Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation New York Printed at the Cranbrook Press Bloomfield Hills Michigan.Google Scholar
  8. Klee, P. (1953). Pedagogical sketchbook (Introduction and Translation by S. Maholy-Nagy) (Current ed.). New York, N.Y.: Fredrick A. Prager, inc. (originally published 1953).Google Scholar
  9. Mabry, R., Wagon, S., & Schattschneider, D. (1997). Automating Escher’s Combinatorial Patterns. Mathematica in Education and Research, 5(4), 38–52.Google Scholar
  10. Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. United States, W.H: Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
  11. Posamentier, S. A., & Lehmann, I. (2007). The (Fabulous) Fibonacci Numbers. Amherst, New York: Published by Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  12. Stephenson, K. (2003). Circle packing: A mathematical tale. Notices of a Mathematical Society, 50(11), 1376–1388.Google Scholar
  13. Wells, D. (1991). The Penguin dictionary of curious and interesting geometry (pp. 30–31, 167). New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-011813-6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San RafaelUSA

Personalised recommendations