The Changing Institutional Space Regarding Roles and Behavior of Village Leaders: An Evolution from Villagers’ Autonomy to the Power List

  • Yuejin Jing
  • Lina Zhang


The rural society in China has undergone dramatic changes in the past four decades since the implementation of reform and opening-up. These changes are reflected in width, depth, and disparity. Width refers to the fact that they cover a wide range of aspects, such as politics, economy, society, culture, and mentality. Depth refers to the fact that a suite of factors, including the market economy, industrialization, urbanization, population flow, and the Internet, alter the way that villagers make a living and the physical configuration of rural areas in a fundamental manner. Disparity refers to the fact that changes in width and depth display a degree of differences in speed and pattern in different areas as well as the structural difference in the process of resource reallocation (many villages may well vanish on the horizon).


  1. Central Commission for Discipline Inspection website.
  2. Duara, P. 2010. Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900–1942. Nangjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
  3. Fan, B., Shao Qing, and Xu Wei. 2013. A study on the functional alienation of village-level organizations in the post-agricultural tax era and its governance. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 5: 177–188.Google Scholar
  4. Fei, X. 2009. Gentry in China. Shanghai: SDX Joint Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Fei, X., Wu Han, et al. 2015. Imperial Power and Gentry Power. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fu, Y. 2014. Triple roles of village leaders and relevant policies: An exploration of land requisition and compensation. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3: 154–163.Google Scholar
  7. He, X. 2007. Interpretation of the experience of Houchen Village. New Observation 2: 26–27.Google Scholar
  8. He, X. 2015. Incomes of village leaders and professionalization. Social Governance Review 11: 64–66.Google Scholar
  9. Jing, Y. 2003. The two-ballot system: Organizational technology and election pattern – The relationship between the two committees and the power construction in villages. Journal of Renmin University of China 3: 124–130.Google Scholar
  10. Li, M. 2010. The Biography of Yan Xishan. Tai Yuan: Shanxi People’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Li, Y., and Y. Wang. 2011. The actual impact of the “official” status of village leaders on villagers’ autonomy and suggestions on policies: An empirical study of Zhejiang Province. Probe 5: 67–72.Google Scholar
  12. Lin, J. 2012. Village merging and development of rural communities. The Journal of Humanities 1: 160–164.Google Scholar
  13. Manion, M. 2006. Democracy, community, trust: The impact of elections in rural China. Comparative Political Studies 39(3): 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China website,村民委员会.
  15. Ning, Z., H. Liu, Z. Wang, and H. Chai. 2005. Where should village leaders go: The possibility of granting village leaders the status of civil servants? China Rural Survey 1: 58–65.Google Scholar
  16. Pan, Z. 2012. Innovation in the primary-level democratic supervisory system in rural areas – An exploration of the supervisory committee of village affairs in Zhejiang Province. Rural Economy 3: 11–13.Google Scholar
  17. Shen, J., and Jing Chen. 2001. “Weak custodians” in villages: An analysis of the roles of village leaders from the mass perspective – A case study of rural areas in southern Shandong Province. China Rural Survey 5: 53–61.Google Scholar
  18. Su, S. 2002. From “Protector” to “Contractor.” In: Yang Shan Hua and Wang Si Bing (eds.) Social Transformation: The Exploration of Young Scholars at Peking University. China: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sun, X. 2009. Democracy in villages – Roles and behavior of village leaders. Society 29(1): 66–68.Google Scholar
  20. Vivienne, S. 1988. The Reach of the State: Sketches of Chinese Body Politic. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wang, F. 2007. Government of the Republic of China – The Township System in the New County System. Capital Normal University, 1–52.Google Scholar
  22. Wang, Z. 2013. Yan Xishan established village leadership system. Senior Citizens in Shanxi 10: 48.Google Scholar
  23. Wang, Z., and Y. Fu. 2009. Research into Village Leaders. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wei, S. 2014. The status quo, problems and solutions concerning the supervision of village affairs. People’s Tribune 8: 128–130.Google Scholar
  25. Wu, Y. 2001. Dual role, broker model, night watchman, and bell-ringer. Open Times 12: 114–117.Google Scholar
  26. Wu, Y. 2002. Dual marginalization: Typological analysis of the roles and behavior of village leaders. Management World 11: 78–85.Google Scholar
  27. Xu, Y. 1997. Dual roles of village leaders: The agent and the patriarch. Twenty-First Century 8: 151–158.Google Scholar
  28. Yang, Y., and Tong Liu. 2014. The nominalization of the Supervisory Committee of Village Affairs and its solution. Rural Economy 2: 109–112.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang, Z. 2008. Research into Chinese Gentry. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zhu, Y. 2008. CCTV Pays Constant Attention to the Supervisory Committee of Village Affairs in Wuyi County.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuejin Jing
    • 1
  • Lina Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science, School of Social SciencesTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations