Borders, Citizenship and the Subaltern in South Asia
Abstract
This chapter will argue that borders consist of an overlapping and changeable set of boundaries with different and often contradictory functions, histories, meanings and roles. Furthermore, not only that they are the outcome of ‘bordering processes’ with social, economic and political underpinnings, they have to be permanently aligned, reproduced and justified while maintaining the simulacrum of fixity and stability. In Van Houtum’s words, borders are a ‘fabricated truth’ (Van Houtum, The mask of the border. In: Wastl-Walter D (ed). The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Ashgate, Farnham, 2011: 49). Their lived experience and the limits of their containment function are best observed in the way they define, undefined and redefine citizenship and belonging.
In the following pages, I will posit that shifting our emphasis from borders to relational geographies is the first step towards undoing the pre-existing ‘containment thinking’ that historically framed debates on citizenship. Whereas a certain degree of legal-political verity is required when addressing issues of sovereignty, the spaces of class, identity, ethnicity and in general alterity transcend the border. This is not a matter of transforming ‘thick borders’ into ‘thin borders’ with a magical sleight of hand but an invitation to expand the horizon of our understanding to an intertwined network of critical practices. Examining power practices within the bordering process itself and underlining the relational geographies demarcated by different types of boundaries illustrate why transborder activities could not be addressed only with reference to the geopolitical dimensions of the border. In this commentary, I will also argue for the relevance and importance of post-colonial theory to the study of not just migration and mobility but border maintenance and surveillance. Specifically, I suggest three possible interventions in this regard: stretching the boundaries of the spaces that encompass the post-colonial state, paying closer attention to the spatial connections forged between seemingly disparate places through migration and transborder activities and challenging hierarchical notions of identity and/or place in terms of effected populations’ citizenship status.
Keywords
Post-colonialism State Subaltern South Asia Citizenship BordersBibliography
- Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Re-visioning the world politics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind: Reframing border thinking. Ethics and Global Politics, 1(4), 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Amin, S. (1985). Delinking. Towards a polycentric world (M. Wolfers, Trans.). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bhambra, G. K. (2007). Rethinking modernity: Postcolonialism and the sociological imagination. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Biggs, M. (1999). Putting the state on the map: Cartography, territory, and European state formation. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41, 374–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bose, S., & Jalal, A. (2002). Modern South Asia: History, culture, political economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buchanan, A., & Moore, M. (Eds.). (2008). States, nations, and borders: The ethics of making boundaries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Canefe, N. (1998). Sovereign Utopias. PhD Thesis, Social and Political Thought. Toronto: York University.Google Scholar
- Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Chibber, V. (2013). Post-colonial theory and the specter of capital. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Cons, J., & Sanyal, R. (2013). Geographies at the margins: Borders in South-Asia. Political Geography, 35, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crowley, J. (2005). Where does the state actually start? The contemporary governance of work and migration. In D. Bigo & E. Guild (Eds.), Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- de Sousa Santos, B. (Ed.). (2007). Another knowledge is possible: Beyond Northern epistemologies. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Delanty, G. (Ed.). (2007). Europe and Asia beyond East and West: Towards a new cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Desai, A. (2011). The artist of disappearance. Mariner Books.Google Scholar
- Desai, G., & Nair, S. (Eds.). (2005). Postcolonialisms: An anthology of cultural theory and criticism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Diener, A. C., & Hagen, J. (2012). Borders. A very short introduction. Oxford\New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dirlik, A. (1994). The postcolonial aura: Third world criticism in the age of global capitalism. Critical Inquiry, 20, 328–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dussel, E. (1995). Eurocentrism and modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). In J. Beverley et al. (Eds.), The postmodernism debate in Latin America (pp. 65–77). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Dussel, E. (2000). Europe, modernity and eurocentrism. Nepantla. Views from South, 1(3), 465–478.Google Scholar
- Escobar, A. (2004). Beyond the Third World: Imperial globality, global coloniality, and anti-globalization social movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the Map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kostakopoulou, D. (2006). Thick, thin and thinner patriotisms: Is this all there is? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krishna, S. (1994). Cartographic anxiety: Mapping the body politic in India. Alternatives, 19, 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laclau, E. (2000). Emancipation(s). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Loomba, A. (2005). Colonialism/Postcolonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lugones, M. (2011). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McClintock, A. (1992). The angel of progress: Pitfalls of the term ‘post-colonialism’. Social Text, 31/32, 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mignolo, W. (2000a). The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mignolo, W. D. (2000b). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mignolo, W. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 449–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Näsström, S. (2004). What globalization overshadows. Political Theory, 31, 818.Google Scholar
- Neocleous, M. (2003). Off the map: On violence and cartography. European Journal of Social Theory, 6, 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman, D. (2003). On borders and power: A theoretical framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nine, C. (2008). The moral arbitrariness of borders: Against Beitz. Contemporary Political Theory, 7, 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ong, A. (2008). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Paasi, A. (2005). The changing discourses on political boundaries. Mapping the backgrounds, contexts and contents. In H. van Houtum, O. Kramsch, & W. Zierhofer (Eds.), B/Ordering space (pp. 17–31). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Pandey, G. (2008). Subaltern citizens and their histories. Interventions, 10(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Popescu, G. (2012). Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century. Understanding borders. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Prakash, G. (2000). The impossibility of subaltern history. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(2), 287–293.Google Scholar
- Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roy, K., & Gates, S. (2017). Limited war in South Asia: From decolonization to recent times. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Said, E. (1995). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Saldanha, A. (2008). Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and Planning A, 40, 2080–2096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samaddar, R. (2017). The politics of dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, C. (1985). The end of law. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Shohat, E. (1992). Notes on the postcolonial. Social Text, 31/32, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sinha, S., & Varma, R. (2017). Marxism and post-colonial theory: What’s left of the debate. Race and Class, 43, 545–558.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1988a). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1988b). In other worlds. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1990). Post-structuralism, marginality, postcoloniality and value. In P. Collier & H. Geyer-Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Spivak, G. C. (1999). Critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sunder Rajan, R. (2010). Death and the subaltern. In R. Morris (Ed.), Can the subaltern speak? Reflections on the history of an idea. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, P. J., & Flint, C. (2007). Political geography: World economy, nation-state and locality. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Van Houtum, H. (2011). The mask of the border. In D. Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 49–61). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Walters, W. (2006). Rethinking borders beyond the state. Comparative European Politics, 4, 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warschawski, M. (2005). On the border (p. xviii). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
- Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.). (2011). The Ashgate research companion to border studies. Farnham Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Wilson, T. M., & Donnan, H. (2012). Borders and border studies. In T. M. Wilson & H. Donnan (Eds.), A companion to border studies (pp. 1–25). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Companions to Anthropology).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zizek, S. (2004). The topology of being and the geopolitics of knowledge. Modernity, empire, coloniality. City, 8(1), 29–56.Google Scholar