Non-market Allocation and Rent Seeking

  • Mohammad Dulal Miah
  • Yasushi Suzuki


In the real-world scenario, we encounter many transactions involved with non-market allocation of resources, including quota system, regulated price, lottery system, first-come-first-serve basis, and restricted licensing. Although it is argued that price mechanisms can best ensure the efficient allocation of scarce resources, non-price distribution methods are adopted where markets are absent to price a particular goods or service, or it is extremely costly to arrange the price mechanism. Although non-market mechanisms are often well-meaning, being designed to achieve ends that are thought to be socially desirable, such interventions often generate by-products, including bribery and corruption, which the regulators might easily overlook. This chapter discuses these issues in detail. It is shown that non-market mechanisms in a weak state tend to increase competition between and among various economic agents, who compete to capture rent created by non-market systems. As a result, the allocation remains economically unproductive. Moreover, this distributive system has been maneuvered to achieve political gains instead of ensuring economic efficiency. Cases are illustrated to provide supporting evidence to this hypothesis. The cases show that non-market allocation is economically damaging if the power of the state is weak and rent seeking is perverse.


  1. Che, Y.-K., & Gale, I. L. (2009). Market versus Non-Market Assignment of Ownership (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1328984). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from (on December 21, 2017).
  2. Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deepita, N. D. (2006, February 4). From BTV to ETV and beyond: The television revolution. The Daily Star, 15th Anniversary Special, Dhaka.Google Scholar
  4. Demsetz, H. (1964). The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights. The Journal of Law and Economics, 7, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goeree, J. K., & Holt, C. A. (1999). Classroom Games: Rent-Seeking and the Inefficiency of Non-market Allocations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Green, R. K., Malpezzi, S., & Vandell, K. (1994). Urban Regulations and the Price of Land and Housing in Korea. Journal of Housing Economics, 3(4), 330–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hillman, A. (2013). Rent seeking. In M. Reksulak, L. Razzolini, & W. F. Shughart II (Eds.), The Elgar Companion to Public Choice (2nd ed., pp. 307–330). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Khan, A. W. (2013). Private television ownership in Bangladesh: A critical qualitative inquiry (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis). The University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from (on September 09, 2017).
  9. Khan, A. W. (2007, March 16). 10 TV Channels Licences available in lightning fast speed. The Daily Star, Dhaka.Google Scholar
  10. Kochanek, S. A. (1996). The Rise of Interest Politics in Bangladesh. Asian Survey, 36(7), 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mahmud, A. (2007). Corruption in Plan Permission Process in RAJUK: A Study of Violations and Proposals. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB). Retrieved from (on January 23, 2018).
  12. Saad, H. (2007, August 17). Down the Rangs Alley. New Age Extra, Dhaka.Google Scholar
  13. Sabet, D. M., & Tazreen, A. (2015). Governing Growth: Understanding Problems in Real Estate Development in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salant, D. J. (2004). Up in the Air: GTE’s Experience in the MTA Auction for Personal Communication Services Licenses. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6(3), 549–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shoesmith, B., Mahmud, S., & Reza, S. (2013). A political history of television in Bangladesh. In B Shoesmith & J. W. Genilo (Eds.), Bangladesh’s changing mediascape: From state control to market forces (pp. 237–255). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  16. Tu, Y., & Wong, G. K. M. (2002). Public Policies and Public Resale Housing Prices in Singapore. International Real Estate Review, 5(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  17. Tullock, G. (1989). The Economics of Special Privilege and Rent Seeking. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Dulal Miah
    • 1
  • Yasushi Suzuki
    • 2
  1. 1.University of NizwaBirkat Al MawzOman
  2. 2.Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific UniversityBeppuJapan

Personalised recommendations