Case Study: Ensay and Swifts Creek Wild Dog Groups—East Gippsland, Victoria

  • Tanya M. HowardEmail author
  • Theodore R. Alter
  • Paloma Z. Frumento
  • Lyndal J. Thompson


The neighbouring communities of Ensay and Swifts Creek face similar threats from wild dogs but are shown to respond in very different ways. This case study reveals how local context influences the way an issue is understood by different communities. Through dissent and discord, a significant connection between knowledge of the issue and power to steer the agenda is identified.

Despite their differences of opinion, each group articulates a common goal to sustain a viable sheep industry. They share similar concerns for the survival of their townships and a desire to actively manage their own destiny. It is in their approach to gaining new knowledge and working with government that their paths begin to diverge. Each develops a strategy that draws on the perceived strengths of their landholder community. This reveals how uneven development of education, expertise and political capabilities can be influential in shaping a community response.

Information, knowledge and recognition all emerge as significant factors in developing a confident community-led program. These cases document a new phase of government investment in community engagement for wild dog control. There is an indication that awareness of how important context can become part of a new engagement practice in the state. It is likely that the benefits will extend beyond the sheep industry to the capacity of the local community.


  1. Agriculture Victoria. (2015). Noxious weed and pest management. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  2. Agriculture Victoria. (2016). Fox bounty. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2010–2011). Cat. No. 7121.0—Agricultural Commodities, Australia, 2010–11. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Google Scholar
  4. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Victoria. (2015). Dingoes in Victoria. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  5. Editorial. (2013a, August 30). Wild dog baiting springs into gear. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  6. Editorial. (2013b, October 31). Call to lift aerial baiting ban. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  7. Editorial. (2014a, January 13). First approval for aerial baiting bid. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  8. Editorial. (2014b, February 26). Local wild dog knowledge sought. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  9. Editorial. (2014c, February 26). Bounty back in business. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  10. Ensay Winery. (n.d.). Ensay Winery. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  11. Little River Inn. (n.d.). Ensay Station Shearing Woolshed Ruins. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  12. Mulcahy, M. (2012). VFF support for summit on wild dogs. Border Mail. Accessed December 19, 2017.
  13. Oldfield, J. (2012, November 8). Dogfight needs co-operation. Stock & Land. Accessed December 21, 2017.
  14. Poole, L. (2015, September 9). Victoria to begin aerial baiting for wild dogs next month as East Gippsland farmers spend thousands on electric fences. ABC Rural. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  15. State Government of Victoria. (2013). Action plan for managing wild dogs in Victoria 2014–2019. East Melbourne, VIC: Department of Environment and Primary Industries.Google Scholar
  16. State Government of Victoria. (2015). Omeo, Swifts Creek, Ensay and Benambra Wild Dog Management Zone Work Plan 2015–2016. Melbourne, VIC: Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning.Google Scholar
  17. Wikipedia. (2014). Ensay, Victoria. Encyclopedia entry.,_Victoria. Accessed February 17, 2016.
  18. Wikipedia. (2015). Swifts Creek. Encyclopedia entry. Accessed February 17, 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanya M. Howard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theodore R. Alter
    • 2
  • Paloma Z. Frumento
    • 2
  • Lyndal J. Thompson
    • 3
  1. 1.Australian Centre for Agriculture and LawUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Center for Economic and Community DevelopmentPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Education and TrainingUniversity of New EnglandCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations