Advertisement

The Context of Community Pest Management in Australia: Myths, Stories and Narrative Enquiry

  • Tanya M. Howard
  • Theodore R. Alter
  • Paloma Z. Frumento
  • Lyndal J. Thompson
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we introduce concepts that ground our research purpose, methodology and analysis. We provide key background information to illustrate the current ecological and social landscape of pest management in Australia. This includes:
  • Outlining how Australia’s history and culture influence the current context of pest management today.

  • Presenting our framing of pest management as a community problem that requires collective action.

We make recommendations about how these concepts might help practitioners in their work with community members. These include:
  • Being alert to the influence of power dynamics in shaping community interactions, including how sources of knowledge are used and valued.

  • Developing skills in critical reflection about community values and beliefs as a necessary foundation for addressing public issues such as pest management.

  • Recognising that terms and ideas, such as “community engagement” and “shared responsibility”, can carry diverse meanings for different people. Practitioners should push past assumptions to define terms with community members within their specific context.

  • Suggesting that stories are one way to build common purpose and increase the likelihood of shared community action.

This chapter aims to persuade you, the reader, that best practice community pest management is achieved through a balance of both social and scientific knowledge. We suggest that:
  • Storytelling and dialogue allow individuals and groups to rethink present issues and future possibilities, encompassing diverse or less dominant perspectives to challenge current thinking.

  • Readers can use the stories to prompt reflection about ways of approaching issues in working with people in community.

References

  1. Adams, D., & Hess, M. (2001). Community in public policy: Fad or foundation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(2), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agriculture Victoria. (2015). Invasive plants and animals policy framework. Biosecurity Strategy for Victoria. http://agriculture.vic.gov.au/agriculture/pests-diseases-and-weeds/protecting-victoria-from-pest-animals-and-weeds. Accessed December 12, 2017.
  3. Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling Wicked Problems: a public policy perspective. Contemporary Government Challenges. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, M., Jackson, S., Shellberg, J., & Sinnamon, V. (2014). Working knowledge: Characterising collective indigenous, scientific, and local knowledge about the ecology, hydrology and geomorphology of Oriners Station, Cape York Peninsula, Australia. The Rangeland Journal, 36(1), 53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1071/rj13083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr, N. (2011). I hope you are feeling uncomfortable now: Role conflict and the natural resources extension officer. In D. J. Pannell & F. Vanclay (Eds.), Changing land management: Adoption of new practices by rural landholders (pp. 129–139). Melbourne, VIC: CSIRO publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, K. G., Zimmerman, K., Schardt, J. D., Stone, J., Lukens, R. R., Reichard, S., et al. (2008). Invasive species defined in a policy context: Recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 1(4), 414–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-08-089.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braysher, M. (2017). Managing Australia’s pest animals. Canberra, ACT: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  8. Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2010). Public sociology, public scholarship and community development. Community Development, 41(4), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caluya, G. (2014). Fragments for a postcolonial critique of the Anthropocene: Invasion biology and environmental security. In J. Frawley & I. McCalman (Eds.), Rethinking invasion ecologies from the environmental humanities (pp. 31–44). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Clendinnen, I. (2006). The history question: Who owns the past? Quarterly Essay, 23, 68.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, M. J., Sindel, B. M., & Stayner, R. A. (2017). Effectiveness of best practice management guides for improving invasive species management: A review. The Rangeland Journal, 39(1), 39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1071/rj16087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coman, B. J. (1999). Tooth & nail: The story of the rabbit in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Text Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, J. J. (2015). Who’s pulling the fracking strings? Power, collaboration and Colorado fracking policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(6), 373–385.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cornwall, A. (2002). Locating citizen participation. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 33(2), i–x.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00016.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craik, W., Palmer D., & Sheldrake R. (2012). Intergovernmental agreement on biosecurity review draft report. Canberra, ACT: Council of Australian Governments. http://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity/partnerships/nbc/intergovernmental-agreement-on-biosecurity/igabreview/igab-draft-report. Accessed December 12, 2017.
  16. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Liberal democracy and the critical alternative. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations (pp. 8–30). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eversole, R. (2011). Community agency and community engagement: Re-theorising participation in governance. Journal of Public Policy, 31(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Everts, J. (2015). Invasive life, communities of practice, and communities of fate. GeografiskaAnnaler: Series B, Human Geography, 97(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fear, F. A., Rosaen, C. L., Bawden, R. J., & Foster-Fishman, P. G. (2006). Coming to critical engagement: An authoethnographic exploration. Maryland, USA: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, F. (2005). Citizens, experts and the environment: the politics of local knowledge (1st ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fitzgerald, G., Fitzgerald, N., & Davidson, C. (2007). Public attitudes towards invasive animals and their impacts. Literature review. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre. https://www.pestsmart.org.au/public-attitudes-towards-invasive-animals-and-their-impacts/. Accessed December 12, 2017.
  22. Flannery, T. F. (2005). The future eaters: An ecological history of the Australasian lands and people (New ed.). Sydney, NSW: Reed New Holland.Google Scholar
  23. Ford-Thompson, A., Snell, C., Saunders, G., & White, P. (2012). Stakeholder participation in management of invasive vertebrates. Conservation Biology, 26(2), 345–356.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01819.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Forester, J. (2016). The challenge of transformative learning: Mining practice stories to study collaboration and dispute resolution strategies. In R. D. Margerum & C. J. Robinson (Eds.), The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance (pp. 338–354). London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Francis, G. W. (1862). The Acclimatisation of harmless, useful, interesting and ornamental animals and plants. In The Philosophical Society (Ed.), A paper read before the Philosophical Society. Adelaide, SA: The Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  26. Gammage, B. (2012). The biggest estate on earth: how Aborigines made Australia. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  27. Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago, USA: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gaventa, J. (2002). Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. Institute for Development Studies Bulletin, 33(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodson, I., Biesta, G., Tedder, M., & Adair, N. (2010). Narrative learning. Oxford, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hillier, J. (2017). No place to go? Management of non-human animal overflows in Australia. European Management Journal, 25(6), 712–721.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horne, D. (1985). Who rules Australia? Daedalus, 114(1), 171–196.Google Scholar
  32. Howard, T. M. (2017). “Raising the bar”: The role of institutional frameworks for community engagement in Australian natural resource governance. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 78–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howard, T. M., Thompson, L. J., Frumento, P. Z., & Alter, T. (2018). Wild dog management in Australia: an interactional approach to case studies of community-led action. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(3).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1414337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 4(1), 70–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levine, P. (2013). We are the ones we have been waiting for: The promise of civic renewal in America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Low, T. (1999). Feral future. Ringwood, VIC: Viking.Google Scholar
  38. Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992). 175 CLR 1.Google Scholar
  39. Marsden, J. (1998). The rabbits. Port Melbourne, VIC: Lothian Books.Google Scholar
  40. Mathews, D. (2005). The politics of self-rule: Six public practices. Connections, 4–6. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pascoe, B. (2014). Dark emu: Black seeds: Agriculture or accident?. Broome, WA: Magabala Books.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, S., Alter, T. R., & Shaffer, T. (2010). Hot passion and cool judgement: relating reason and emotion in democractic politics. Connections, 15–17. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  44. Purcell, B. (2010). Dingo. Canberra, ACT: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  45. Rangan, H., Wilson, A., & Kull, C. (2014). Thorny problems: Industrial pastoralism and managing “country” in northwest Queensland. In J. Frawley & I. McCalman (Eds.), Rethinking invasion ecologies from the environmental humanities (pp. 116–134). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Rolls, E. C. (1983). They all ran wild: the animals and plants that plague Australia (Rev ed.). Sydney, NSW: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, D. B. (2011). Wild dog dreaming. Charlottesville, USA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schmid, A. (2008). Conflict and cooperation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  49. Seddon, G. (2003). Farewell to arcady: Or getting off the sheep’s back. Thesis Eleven, 74(1), 35–53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136030741004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stobbelaar, D., Groot, J., Bishop, C., Hall, J., & Pretty, J. (2009). Internalization of agri-environmental policies and the role of institutions. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), S175–S184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Subramaniam, B. (2001). The Aliens Have Landed! Reflections on the rheotoric of biological invasions. Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism, 2(1), 26–40.Google Scholar
  52. Trigger, D., Mulcock, J., Gaynor, A., & Toussaint, Y. (2008). Ecological restoration, cultural preferences and the negotiation of “nativeness” in Australia. Geoforum, 39, 1273–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaarzon-Morel, P., & Edwards, G. (2012). Incorporating Aboriginal people’s perceptions of introduced animals in resource management: insights from the feral camel project. Ecological Management & Restoration, 13(1), 65–71.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00619.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Veracini, L. (2010). Settler colonialism: A theoretical overview. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker, G. (2011). The role for “community” in carbon governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(5), 777–782.Google Scholar
  56. Wallis, P. J., & Ison, R. L. (2011). Appreciating Institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: A case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resources Management, 25(15), 4081–4097.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9880-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. White, P. C. L., Ford, A. E. S., Clout, M. N., Engeman, R. M., Roy, S., & Saunders, G. (2008). Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: Pattern, process and the social dimension. Wildlife Research, 35(3), 171–179.  https://doi.org/10.1071/wr08058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, R. (2011). The many meanings of adoption. In D. J. Pannell & F. Vanclay (Eds.), Changing land management: Adoption of new practices by rural landholders (pp. 39–50). Melbourne, VIC: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson, E. (1875). Acclimatisation: Read before the Royal Colonial Institute. In Royal Colonial Institute (Ed.), Royal Colonial Institute. London, UK: Unwin Brothers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanya M. Howard
    • 1
  • Theodore R. Alter
    • 2
  • Paloma Z. Frumento
    • 2
  • Lyndal J. Thompson
    • 3
  1. 1.Australian Centre for Agriculture and LawUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Center for Economic and Community DevelopmentPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Education and TrainingUniversity of New EnglandCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations