Learning Pattern Analysis: A Case Study of Moodle Learning Management System

  • Rahul Chandra KushwahaEmail author
  • Achintya Singhal
  • S. K. Swain
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 524)


This paper presents the learning pattern analysis of online learning management system Moodle. The experimental work was carried out in Banaras Hindu University, India on the students of three years post graduate course on Computer Application. The comparative study has done on learning patterns of the students on tradition pedagogy with online pedagogy through the learning management system. The Moodle data analytics tool was used for the purpose of reporting students’ data. The results of students learning performance were compared and analyzed using t-test, content analysis and various other mining and analytics tools.


Learning analytics Educational data mining Learning pattern analysis Moodle Learning management system 



This research study has done on MCA students of Banaras Hindu University, Rajiv Gandhi South Campus, at Barkachha, Mirzapur, India. The authors express their acknowledgement to the Course Coordinator, MCA programme (Dr. Achintya Singhal); Head of the Department of Computer Science (Prof. S. Kartikeyan (current) and Prof. S. K. Basu (former)); Professor Incharge, Rajiv Gandhi South Campus (Prof. Saket Kushwaha (current) and Prof. R. P. Shukla (former)) for providing Computer Laboratory Infrastructure and other facilities for conducting research study. The author extends their acknowledgement to the participants MCA Students for their active participation and engagement for the study. The authors also thanks to the teachers and computer laboratory staffs for their help and supports.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Romero, C., Ventura, S., & Garcıa, E. (2008). Data mining in course management systems: Moodle case study and tutorial. Computers & Education, 51, 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haythornthwaite, C., Laat, D. M., & Dawson, S. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on learning analytics. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1371–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics, learning analytics (pp. 61–75).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park, Y., & Hyun, J. (2017). Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 531–547. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, Y., Yue, J. H., & Jo, I. H. (2016). Clustering blended learning courses by online behavior data: A case study in a Korean higher education institute. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romero, C., Lopez, M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68, 458–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexandron, G., et al. (2017). Copying@Scale: Using harvesting accounts for collecting correct answers in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 108, 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park, Y., & Jo, H. I. (2017). Using log variables in a learning management system to evaluate learning activity using the lens of activity theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baker, E. (2010). International Encyclopaedia of Education (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Asif, R., Merceron, A., Ali, S., & Haider, N. (2017). Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining. Computers & Education, 113, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodriguez, T. E. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58, 1085–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teresa, M., & Fernandez, A. S. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cerezo, R., Santill, M. S., Ruiz, M. P. P., & Núnez, J. C. (2016). Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T Value Table.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DST-Centre for Interdisciplinary Mathematical SciencesInstitute of Science, Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceInstitute of Science, Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations