Advertisement

Standardization of Feeding Tests in Phytophagous Insects to Host and Nonhost Plants

  • G. Basanagouda
  • K. R. M. Bhanu
Chapter

Abstract

To distinguish host or nonhost plant of a phytophagous insect, it is important that a standardized procedure is in place. Disc method used for chewing and biting insects is described in this chapter. The statistical methods that can be employed are also mentioned.

Keywords

Host plant Nonhost plant Leaf-disc method Feeding stimulants 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank authorities of the National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, and Pest Control India, Bengaluru, for their encouragement and support.

References

  1. Bernays Elizabeth, A., & Chapman Reginald, F. (2007). Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects (Vol. 2). Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Jermy, T. (1961). On nature of oligophagy in leptinotarsa decemlineata say (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (p. 119). Hungarian Natural History Museum Baross Publisher.Google Scholar
  3. Jermy, T. (1987). The role of experience in the host selection of phytophagous insects. In Perspectives in chemoreception and behavior (pp. 143—157). Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Jermy, T., Hanson, F. E., & Dethier, V. G. (1968). Induction of specific food preference in lepidopterous larvae. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 11(2), 211–230 Wiley Online Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Phillips, W. M. (1977). Modification of feeding ‘preference’ in the flea beetle, Haltica lythri (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 21, 71.80.Google Scholar
  6. Stadler, E., & Hanson, F. E. (1978). Food discrimination and induction of preference for artificial diets in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta. Physiological Entomology, 3, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Visser. (1986). Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 31, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Gilbert, B. L., & Norris, D. M. (1968). A chemical basis for bark beetle, distinction between host and non-host trees. Journal of Insect Physiology, 14, 1063–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Shorey, H. H., & Mckelvey, J. J. (Eds.) (1977) Chemical control of insect behaviour: Theory and applications (p. 414). New York: A Wiley Interscience Publications/Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Stevenson, P. C., Green, P. W. C., Simmonds, M. S. J., & Sharma, H. C. (2005). Physical and chemical mechanisms of plant resistance to Helicoverpa. Recent Research on Chickpea and Pigeon pea. 209–221. In H. C Sharma (Ed.), Heliothis Helicoverpa management: Emerging trends and strategies for future research (p. 469). New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing company Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Basanagouda
    • 1
  • K. R. M. Bhanu
    • 2
  1. 1.Crop Protection DivisionICAR-National Rice Research InstituteCuttackIndia
  2. 2.Biological Control Research Laboratory, Pest Control IndiaRajanaKunteBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations