Advertisement

Techniques for Determining Mechanisms of Resistance: Antixenosis for Oviposition

  • K. R. Manikandan
  • A. Arasu
Chapter

Abstract

In the host selection process, oviposition by adult female is a crucial step. It establishes the fact that the insect can utilize the plant for reproduction. The ovipositional preference of an adult can be tested under choice/no-choice conditions. Nonparametric and parametric statistical tools can be deployed to deduce inferences from the experiments.

Keywords

Ovipositional preference Choice conditions No-choice conditions Reproduction 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank authorities of Agricultural College and Research Institute (TNAU), Madurai, Tamilnadu, and Annamalai University, Tamilnadu for their support.

References

  1. Eilenberg, J. (1987). Abnormal egg-laying behaviour of female carrot flies (Psila rosae) induced by the fungus Entomophthora muscae. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 43, 61–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1987.tb02203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ramaswamy, S. B., Ma, W. K., & Baker Gerald, T. (1987). Sensory cues and receptors for oviposition by Heliothis virescens. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 43, 159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1987.tb03600.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Reed, D. W., Pivnick, K. A., & Underhill, E. W. (1989). Identification of chemical oviposition stimulants for the diamondback moth, Plutellaxylostella, present in three species of Brassicaceae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 53, 277–286.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1989.tb03575.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Prokopy, R. J., & Owens Elizabeth, D. (1983). Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 28, 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Renwick, J. A. A., & Radke, C. D. (1981). Host plant constituents as oviposition deterrents for the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 30, 201–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1981.tb03099.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Salama, H. S., Rizk, A. F., & Sharaby, A. (1984). Chemical stimuli in flowers and leaves of cotton that affect behaviour in the cotton moth Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomologia Generalis, 10, 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1127/entom.gen/10/1984/27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Sami, A. (1983). Herbivorous insects: host-seeking behaviour and mechanisms (p. 274). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Saxena, K. N., & Goyal, S. (1978). Host-plant relations of the citrus butterfly Papilio demoleus L.: Orientational and ovipositional responses. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 24(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sree Latha, E., & Sharma, H. C. (2018). Antixenosis mechanism of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum Linn.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(2), 1233–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stadler, E., & Buser, H. R. (1984) Oviposition stimulents for the carrot fly in the surface wax of the carrot leaves. In Proceeding of the 5th International symposium on insect-plant relationships, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 403–404.Google Scholar
  8. Zalucki, M. P. (1991). Heliothis: Research methods and prospects (p. 234). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. R. Manikandan
    • 1
  • A. Arasu
    • 2
  1. 1.Agricultural College and Research Institute (TNAU)MaduraiIndia
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia

Personalised recommendations