Advertisement

Effect of Cathodic Electron Acceptors on the Performance of Microbial Desalination Cell

  • Harapriya Pradhan
  • Makarand M. GhangrekarEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

The effluent discharged from domestic and industrial activities contains both organic and inorganic matter, which requires effective treatment before discharging into the water body. Recently, a new bioelectrochemical system called microbial desalination cell (MDC) is developed for simultaneous removal of organic matter and dissolved solids along with energy recovery. Four MDCs, each consisting of five chambers, viz. anodic, cathodic, desalination, and two concentrate chambers, were operated in batch mode. The performance of MDCs for total dissolved solids (TDS) removal and power generation was observed using different cathodic electron acceptors, viz. oxygen, dichromate, permanganate, and hypochlorite. At 5 g/L of initial TDS concentration in desalination chamber, the TDS removal efficiencies of 52 ± 3, 55 ± 3, 58 ± 2 and 64 ± 2% were observed with oxygen, dichromate, permanganate and hypochlorite as catholyte, respectively. The TDS removal was further enhanced to 72 ± 2, 78 ± 4, 82 ± 3 and 89 ± 2% with oxygen, dichromate, permanganate and hypochlorite as catholyte, respectively, under 30 g/L of TDS concentration of saline water. Maximum sustainable power densities of 18, 26, 60 and 207 mW/m2 were generated with oxygen, dichromate, permanganate and hypochlorite as catholyte, respectively, at 100 Ω external resistance when 5 g/L TDS concentration was used for desalination. At 30 g/L of TDS concentration, the sustainable power densities increased to 25, 35, 84 and 347 mW/m2 with oxygen, dichromate, permanganate and hypochlorite as catholyte, respectively, due to reduced internal resistance of the cell. Hence, there is a scope to improve the electricity recovery in MDC using chemical catholytes. Higher TDS concentration in desalination chamber leads to higher desalination performance as compared to lower TDS concentration. High redox potential of hypochlorite favoured higher desalination performance as compared to other electron acceptors. Hence, cathodic electron acceptors have a significant effect on TDS removal and electricity recovery in the system.

Keywords

Catholytes Hypochlorite Microbial desalination cell Microbial fuel cell Total dissolved solids removal 

References

  1. 1.
    Cao X, Huang X, Liang P, Xiao K, Zhou Y, Zhang X, Logan BE (2009) A new method for water desalination using microbial desalination cells. Environ Sci Technol 43(18):7148–7152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo H, Xu P, Roane TM, Jenkins PE, Ren Z (2012) Microbial desalination cells for improved performance in wastewater treatment, electricity production, and desalination. Biores Technol 105:60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forrestal C, Xu P, Ren Z (2012) Sustainable desalination using a microbial capacitive desalination cell. Energy Environ Sci 5(5):7161–7167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang B, He Z (2012) Integrated salinity reduction and water recovery in an osmotic microbial desalination cell. Rsc Adv 2(8):3265–3269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobson KS, Drew DM, He Z (2011) Efficient salt removal in a continuously operated upflow microbial desalination cell with an air cathode. Biores Technol 102(1):376–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacobson KS, Drew DM, He Z (2011) Use of a liter-scale microbial desalination cell as a platform to study bioelectrochemical desalination with salt solution or artificial seawater. Environ Sci Technol 45(10):4652–4657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen X, Xia X, Liang P, Cao X, Sun H, Huang X (2011) Stacked microbial desalination cells to enhance water desalination efficiency. Environ Sci Technol 45(6):2465–2470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qu Y, Feng Y, Liu J, He W, Shi X, Yang Q, Lv J, Logan BE (2013) Salt removal using multiple microbial desalination cells under continuous flow conditions. Desalination 317:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pradhan H, Ghangrekar MM (2015) Organic matter and dissolved salts removal in a microbial desalination cell with different orientation of ion exchange membranes. Desalin Water Treat 54(6):1568–1576Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mehanna M, Kiely PD, Call DF, Logan BE (2010) Microbial electrodialysis cell for simultaneous water desalination and hydrogen gas production. Environ Sci Technol 44(24):9578–9583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghadge AN, Jadhav DA, Pradhan H, Ghangrekar MM (2015) Enhancing waste activated sludge digestion and power production using hypochlorite as catholyte in clayware microbial fuel cell. Biores Technol 82:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jadhav DA, Ghadge AN, Mondal D, Ghangrekar MM (2014) Comparison of oxygen and hypochlorite as cathodic electron acceptor in microbial fuel cells. Biores Technol 154:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghangrekar MM, Shinde VB (2007) Performance of membrane-less microbial fuel cell treating wastewater and effect of electrode distance and area on electricity production. Biores Technol 98(15):2879–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghangrekar MM, Asolekar SR, Joshi SG (2005) Characteristics of sludge developed under different loading conditions during UASB reactor start-up and granulation. Water Res 39(6):1123–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1998) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn., American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Picioreanu C, Head IM, Katuri KP, van Loosdrecht MC, Scott K (2007) A computational model for biofilm-based microbial fuel cells. Water Res 41(13):2921–2940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fricke K, Harnisch F, Schröder U (2008) On the use of cyclic voltammetry for the study of anodic electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Energy Environ Sci 1(1):144–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    He Z, Huang Y, Manohar AK, Mansfeld F (2008) Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioelectrochemistry 74(1):78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations