• Rajeesh Kumar


This book critically examines the possible dilution of the neutrality principle of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in internal armed conflicts. It begins with the proposition that the intervention of ICRC in internal armed conflicts led to compromises in neutrality, and questioned the autonomy and independence of the organization. The book also argues that the field operations of the international humanitarian organizations during internal armed conflicts are dependent on the authority exercised by the state in whose territory the conflict persists. The ICRC’s involvement in Sri Lanka and Sudan provides empirical support to validate these propositions and arguments. The cases show that for the ICRC, it is hard to be neutral in situations of internal armed conflicts and such conflicts present formidable challenges to maintain its autonomy.


International Committee of the Red Cross Internal armed conflicts Neutrality Changing nature of war Humanitarianism 


  1. Additional Protocol I. (1977). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 1125 UNTS 3/1991 ATS No 29 ILM 1391.Google Scholar
  2. Alley, R. (2004). Internal Conflict and the International Community: Wars Without End? Dartmouth: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. (2005). “Humanitarianism Transformed.” Perspectives on Politics, 3(4): 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. (2009). “Evolution Without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt.” International Organization, 63(4): 621–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. (2011). Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, R., & P. Dennis. (2009). Solferino 1859: The Battle for Italy’s Freedom. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bugnion, F. (2003). The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  8. ———. (2012). “Birth of an Idea: The Founding of the International Committee of the Red Cross and of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement: From Solferino to the Original Geneva Convention (1859–1864).” International Review of the Red Cross, 94(888): 1–40.Google Scholar
  9. Cho, S. (1996). Applicability of International Humanitarian Law to Internal Armed Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clausewitz, C. V. (1832 [2007]). On War, translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Convention on Maritime Neutrality. (1928). “The Havana Convention on Maritime Neutrality of 1928.” Accessed 20 February 2012:
  12. Creveld, M. V. (2006). The Changing Face of War: Lessons of Combat, from the Marne to Iraq. New York: Presidio Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cullen, A. (2005). “Key Developments Affecting the Scope of Internal Armed Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law.” Military Law Review, 183: 66–109.Google Scholar
  14. Curtis, D. (2001). “Politics and Humanitarian Aid: Debates, Dilemmas and Dissension.” HPG Report No. 10. Accessed 25 March 2012:
  15. Duffield, M. R. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  16. Durham, H., & T. L. H. McCormack (eds.). (1999). The Changing Face of Conflict and the Efficacy of International Humanitarian Law. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Forsythe, D. P. (2005). The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GA Res. (1990). “Observer Status for the International Committee of the Red Cross in Consideration of the Special Role and Mandates Conferred upon It by the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949.” UN Doc. A/RES/45/6. Accessed 23 September 2013:
  19. Gasser, H. P. (2003). “The International Committee of the Red Cross.” In J. M. Gabriel & T. Fischer, eds. Swiss Foreign Policy: 1945–2002, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Geneva Convention I. (1949). Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 31/[1958] ATS No 21.Google Scholar
  21. ——— III. (1949). Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War 12 August 1949, 75 UNTS 135/1958.Google Scholar
  22. Glanville, L. (2012). “The Responsibility to Protect Beyond Borders.” Human Rights Law Review, 12(1): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson, E. N., & J. D. Singer. (2002). “‘New Wars’ and Rumors of ‘New Wars’.” International Interactions, 28(2): 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hershey, A. S. (1916). “Neutrality and International Law.” International Journal of Ethics, 26(20): 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffman, P. J., & T. G. Weiss. (2006). Sword and Salve: New Wars and Humanitarians Crises. Maryland: Roman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  26. Hutchinson, J. F. (1996). Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. ICRC. (1996). The Fundamental Principles of Red Cross and Red Crescent. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  28. International Review of the Red Cross. (1963). “The Foundation of the Red Cross: Some Important Documents.” International Review of the Red Cross, 23(February): 60–75.Google Scholar
  29. ———. (1998). “Statute of the International Committee of the Red Cross.” International Review of the Red Cross, 324(September): 537–543.Google Scholar
  30. Jung, D. (ed.). (2003). Shadow Globalization, Ethnic Conflicts and New Wars: A Political Economy of Intra-state War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Kaldor, M. (2005). New & Old Wars: Organized Violence in Global Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kalyvas, S. N. (2001). “‘New’ and ‘Old’ Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?” World Politics, 54(1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keegan, J. (2001). War and Our World. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, N. (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  35. Ku, C., & J. C. Brun. (2003). “Neutrality and the ICRC Contribution to Contemporary Humanitarian Operations.” International Peacekeeping, 10(1): 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. MacFarlane, S. N., & T. G. Weiss. (2000). “Political Interest and Humanitarian Action.” Security Studies, 10(1): 112–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maurer, P. (2012). “Interview with Peter Maurer: President of the ICRC.” International Review of the Red Cross, 94(888): 1209–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mello, P. A. (2010). “In Search of New Wars: The Debate About a Transformation of War.” European Journal of International Relations, 16(2): 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mills, K. (2005). “Neo-humanitarianism: The Role of International Humanitarian Norms and Organizations in Contemporary Conflict.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 11(2): 161–183.Google Scholar
  40. Moir, L. (1998). “The Historical Development of the Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-international Armed Conflicts to 1949.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 47(2): 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munro, A. (1999). “Humanitarianism and Conflict in a Post-Cold War World.” International Review of the Red Cross, 81(835): 463–475.Google Scholar
  42. Newman, E. (2004). “The New Wars Debate: A Historical Perspective Is Needed.” Security Dialogue, 35(2): 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osuji, C. (2006). “Genocide, Justice and the Forensic Sensibilities of the International Committee of the Red Cross.” Chinese Journal of International Law, 5: 149–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perna, L. (2006). The Formation of the Treaty Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pictet, J. (1979). “The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross.” International Review of the Red Cross, 19(210): 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plattner, D. (1996). “The ICRC Neutrality and Neutrality in Humanitarian Assistance.” International Review of the Red Cross, 36(311): 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ratner, S. R. (2011). “Law Promotion Beyond Law Talk: The Red Cross, Persuasion, and the Laws of War.” The European Journal of International Law, 22(2): 459–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rieff, D. (2002). “Humanitarianism in Crisis.” Foreign Affairs, 81(6): 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rona, G. (2004). “The ICRC Privilege Not to Testify: Confidentiality in Action.” International Review of the Red Cross, 84(845): 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sassoli, M., & A. A. Bouvier (eds.). (1999). How Does Law Protect in War? Cases, Documents and Teaching Materials on Contemporary Practice in International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  51. Sassoli, M. et al. (2011). How Does Law Protect in War? Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  52. Schweers, P. (2009). The Changing Nature of War and Its Impact on International Humanitarian Law. Munich: GRIN Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Sommaruga, C. (1992). “Swiss Neutrality, ICRC Neutrality: Are they Indissociable? An Independence worth Protecting.” International Review of the Red Cross, 32(288): 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Statute of the ICRC. (1986). “Statute of the International Committee of the Red Cross”, adopted by the 25th International Conference of the Red Cross at Geneva in 1986, Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  55. Statute of the Movement. (1986). “Statute of the International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movements”, adopted by the 25th International Conference of the Red Cross at Geneva in 1986, amended in 1995 and 2006, Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
  56. Taubenfeld, H. J. (1953). “International Actions and Neutrality.” The American Journal of International Law, 47(3): 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tuel, J. E., & C. Bassoli. (2012). The War in Italy: The Second Italian War of Independence. London: Leonaur.Google Scholar
  58. Turner, B. (2012). International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). In B. Turner, eds. The Statesman’s Yearbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp: 45–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Warner, D. (1999). “The politics of the political/humanitarian divide.” International Review of the Red Cross, 81(833): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weller, M. (1997). “The Relativity of Humanitarian Neutrality and Impartiality.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law, 91: 441–450.Google Scholar
  61. Wenger, A., & S. J. A. Mason. (2008). “The Civilianization of Armed Conflicts: Trends and Implications.” International Review of the Red Cross, 90(872): 835–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong, W. H. (2012). Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yamashita, H. (2014). “New Humanitarianism and Changing Logics of the Political in International Relations.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 43(2): 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yearbook of International Organizations 2014–2015 (Volume 6). Who’s Who in International Organizations. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajeesh Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Defence Studies and AnalysesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations