Advertisement

Spatial and Behavioural Attributes in Office Design

  • Pranab Kumar Nag
Chapter
Part of the Design Science and Innovation book series (DSI)

Abstract

The interrelationships of spatial as well as behavioural components, such as the task design factors, group psychosocial traits have direct impacts on office design and workplace effectiveness. The office spaces, such as the enclosed cellular offices, open-plan office, co-working or shared space, the enclosures around a work area, and interpersonal distance, refer to as the recognized characteristics of organizational culture. That is, office space and workstation design, spatial density and proximity, biophilia and aesthetics influence the work process in the office and also occupant’s behaviour and performance. This chapter elucidates the psychosocial constructs of work environment relating to communication and social networking among co-workers for positive outcomes, whereas privacy is a multi-layer construct in the process of information control. Stress management, personal control, sense of belonging, territoriality, control and supervision are the identifiable dimensions that influence occupants’ innovation and collaboration, well-being and job satisfaction in the office environment.

References

  1. Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., & Elsarrag, E. (2016). Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature. Building and Environment, 105, 369–389.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, T., Silvester, J., Randall, R., Patterson, F., Robertson, I., Burnes, B., et al. (2010). Work psychology: Understanding human behavior in the workplace (5th ed.). Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bafna, S. (2004). The impact of furniture systems. InformeDesign Newsletter, 4(12), 5.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, F. (2005). Offices at work: Uncommon workspace strategies that add value and improve performance. Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, F. (2007). Organizational ecology and knowledge networks. California Management Review, 49(2), 9.Google Scholar
  7. Bergh, Z., & Theron, A. (Eds.) (2007). Psychology in the work context (3rd ed., pp. 70–73). Southern Africa: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brand, J. L., & Smith, T. J. (2005). Effects of reducing enclosure on perceptions of occupancy quality, job satisfaction, and job performance in open-plan offices. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2005 (Vol. 49, pp. 818–822).Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, A., Chugh, J. S., & Kline, T. (2002). Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal field study. Environment and Behavior, 34(3), 279–299.Google Scholar
  10. Brill, M., & Weidemann, S. (2001). Disproving widespread myths about workplace design. Jasper, IN: BOSTI Associates. Kimball International.Google Scholar
  11. Charles, K. E., & Veitch, J. A. (2002). Environmental satisfaction in open-plan environments: 2. Effects of workstation size, partition height and windows. Institute for Research in Construction. National Research Council Canadá. Internal Report No. IRC-IR-845, Vol. 21, no. 03, 2007. http://irc.nrccnrc.gc.ca/ircpubs.
  12. Churchill W., Speech to the House of Commons. (1943, October 28). On plans for the rebuilding of the Chamber (destroyed by an enemy bomb May 10, 1941). In Never Give In! The best of Winston Churchill’s Speeches (2003), Hyperion (p. 358). ISBN 1401300561.Google Scholar
  13. Danielsson, C. B., & Bodin, L. (2009). Difference in satisfaction with office environment among employees in different office types. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 241–257.Google Scholar
  14. Danielsson, C. B. (2010). The office—An explorative study: architectural design’s impact on health, job satisfaction & well-being. Ph.D. dissertation. KTH, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
  16. De Paoli, D., Sauer, E., & Ropo, A. (2017). The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces’. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Duffy, F., & Tanis, J. (1999). A vision of the new workplace revisited. http://dwp.bigplanet.com/pdkconsulting/nssfolder/pdfdownloads1/TanisDuffy1999.pdf.
  18. Duffy, F., Laing, A., & Crisp, V. (1992). The responsible workplace. Facilities, 10(11), 9–15.Google Scholar
  19. Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54(1), 12–20.Google Scholar
  20. El-Zeiny, R. M. A. (2012). The interior design of workplace and its impact on employees’ performance: A case study of the private sector corporations in Egypt. In Asia Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, Salamis Bay Conti Resort Hotel, Famagusta, North Cyprus, 7–9 December 2011. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 746–756.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, G. W., & McCoy, J. M. (1998). When buildings don’t work: The role of architecture in human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 85–94.Google Scholar
  22. Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922–937.Google Scholar
  23. Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742.Google Scholar
  24. Garris, L. B., & Monroe, L. K. (2005). The color factor. Journal of Buildings, 99(10), 72–73.Google Scholar
  25. George, J. M. (2008). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–477.Google Scholar
  26. Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Colville, WA: Optimal Books.Google Scholar
  27. Goins, J., Jellema, J., & Zhang, H. (2010). Architectural enclosure’s effect on office worker performance: A comparison of the physical and symbolic attributes of workspace dividers. Building and Environment, 45(4), 944–948.Google Scholar
  28. Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(12), 12204–12222.Google Scholar
  29. Hagerty, B. M., & Patusky, K. (1995). Developing a measure of sense of belonging. Nursing Research, 44(1), 9–13.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, A., Wheeler, P., & Whitehead, C. (Eds.) (2004). The distributed workplace. London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Haynes, B. P. (2009). Research design for the measurement of perceived office productivity. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(3), 169–183.Google Scholar
  32. Heerwagen, J. (2009). Biophilia, health, and well-being. J.H: Heerwagen & Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Heerwagen, J., & Hase, B. (2001). Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature in building design. Environmental Design and Construction, 3, 30–36.Google Scholar
  34. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1989). The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hua, Y. (2007). Designing open-plan workplaces for collaboration: An exploration of the impact of workplace spatial settings on space perception and collaboration effectiveness. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  36. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.Google Scholar
  37. Jackson, S. T. L., & Klein, K. W. (2009). Open-plan offices: Task performance and mental workload. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 279–289.Google Scholar
  38. Jaitli, R., & Hua, Y. (2013). Measuring sense of belonging among employees working at a corporate campus: Implication for workplace planning and management. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(2), 117–135.Google Scholar
  39. Jiang, B., & Claramunt, C. (2002). Integration of space syntax into GIS: new perspectives for urban morphology. Transactions in GIS, 6(3), 295–309.Google Scholar
  40. Kakko, I. & Inkinen, S. (2009). Homo creativus: Creativity and serendipity management in third generation science and technology parks. Science and Public Policy, 36(7), 537–548.Google Scholar
  41. Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K. M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity—A longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411.Google Scholar
  42. Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Zawawi, E. M. A. (2010). Employees’ perceptions on color preferences towards productivity in Malaysian office buildings. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 283.Google Scholar
  43. Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2011). Biophilic design: The theory, science and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–80). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In Distributed work (pp. 137–162). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Küller, R., Ballal, S., Laike, T., Mikellides, B., & Tonello, G. (2006). The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: A cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics, 49(14), 1496–1507.Google Scholar
  47. Laurence, G. A., Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2013). ”My space”: A moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 144–152.Google Scholar
  48. Leaman, A. (2006). The logistical city. In J. Worthington (Ed.), Reinventing the workplaces (2nd ed., pp. 11–28). Oxford; Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2010). Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces? Ergonomics, 53(3), 324–335.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 323–333.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, Y. S. (2010). Office layout affecting privacy, interaction, and acoustic quality in LEED-certified buildings. Building and Environment, 45(7), 1594–1600.Google Scholar
  52. Lottrup, L., Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 5–11.Google Scholar
  53. Lu, J., & Noennig, J. R. (2015). An investigation of workplace characteristics influencing knowledge worker’s sense of belonging and organizational outcomes. Dr.-Ing. Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden.Google Scholar
  54. MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 992–1000.Google Scholar
  55. May, D. R., Oldham, G. R., & Rathert, C. (2005). Employee affective and behavioral reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Human Resource Management, 44(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  56. McCoy, J. M. (2001). The creative work environment: The relationship of the physical environment and creative teamwork at a state agency. A case study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  57. McCoy, J. M. (2002). Work environments. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 443–460). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Menzies, G. F., & Wherrett, J. R. (2005). Windows in the workplace: examining issues of environmental sustainability and occupant comfort in the selection of multi-glazed windows. Energy and Buildings, 37(6), 623–630.Google Scholar
  59. Myerson, J., & Ross, P. (2006). Space to work: New office design. London: Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Nardi, B. A., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. J. Hinds & S Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Oldham, G. R., & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 542–556.Google Scholar
  62. Oldham, G. R., Cummings, A., & Zhou, J. (1995). The spatial configuration of organizations: A review of the literature and some new research directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13, 1–37.Google Scholar
  63. Olson, J. S., Teasley, S., Covi, L., & Olson, G. (2002). The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. Distributed Work, 113–135.Google Scholar
  64. Öztürk, E., Yılmazer, S., & Ural, S. E. (2012). The effects of achromatic and chromatic color schemes on participants’ task performance in and appraisals of an office environment. Color Research & Application, 37(5), 359–366.Google Scholar
  65. Pile, J. (1997). Color in interior design. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar
  66. Rashid, M., & Zimring, C. (2005). On psychosocial constructs in office settings: A review of the empirical literature. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 107–122). Department of Design, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  67. Rashid, M., Kampschroer, K., Wineman, J., & Zimring, C. (2006). Spatial layout and face-to-face interaction in offices—A study of the mechanisms of spatial effects on face-to-face interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(6), 825–844.Google Scholar
  68. Salama, A. M., & Courtney, L. (2013). The impact of the spatial qualities of the workplace on architects’ job satisfaction. ArchNet-IJAR, 7(1), 52–64.Google Scholar
  69. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.Google Scholar
  70. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53.Google Scholar
  71. Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.Google Scholar
  72. Shin, W. S. (2007). The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22, 248–253.Google Scholar
  73. Shpuza, E. (2006). Floorplate shapes and office layouts: A model of the effect of floorplate shape on circulation integration (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).Google Scholar
  74. South Korean Government. (2013). Creative economy action plan. http://www.kdi.re.kr/about/gov_download.jsp?file_name=6995_01.pdf.
  75. Steelcase Workspace Futures. (2012). How place fosters innovation. 360 White paper, Steelcase Inc.Google Scholar
  76. Suckley, L., & Dobson, S. (2014, November). Measuring social and spatial relations in an office move. In International Conference on Social Informatics (pp. 478–492). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Tomasco, S. (2010). IBM 2010 Global CEO Study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wss.
  78. Ulrich, R. (2003). The impact of flowers and plants on workplace productivity. Texas A and M University.Google Scholar
  79. US GSA (2006). Innovative workplaces: Benefits and best practices. Washington, DC: U.S. General Services Administration.Google Scholar
  80. van der Voordt, D. J. M. (2003). Costs and benefits of innovative workplace design. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Real Estate and Housing.Google Scholar
  81. Vischer, J. C. (2007a). Space meets status: Designing workplace performance. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Vischer, J. C. (2006). The concept of workspace and its value to management. California Management Review, 49(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  83. Vischer, J. C. (2007b). The concept of workplace performance and its value to managers. California Management Review, 49(2), 62–79.Google Scholar
  84. Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97–108.Google Scholar
  85. Vischer, J. C. (2010). Handbook of human capital. UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wang, N., & Boubekri, M. (2011). Design recommendations based on cognitive, mood and preference assessments in a sunlit workspace. Lighting Research & Technology, 43(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
  87. Wheeler, G., & Almeida, A. (2006). These four walls: The real british office. Creating the Productive Workplace, 357–377.Google Scholar
  88. Wineman, J., & Adhya, A. (2007). Enhancing workspace performance: Predicting the influence of spatial and psychosocial factors on job satisfaction. In Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul (pp. 1–15).Google Scholar
  89. World Green Building Council (WGBC). (2014). Health, Wellbeing & Productivity in Offices, World Green Building Council.Google Scholar
  90. Wright, A. (2007). Colour psychology—The colour affects system. http://www.colouraffects.com.
  91. Zahn, G. L. (1991). Face-to-face communication in an office setting: The effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Communication Research, 18(6), 737–754.Google Scholar
  92. Zhao, L., Lu, Y.B., Wang, B., Chau, P. Y. K., &. Zhang, L. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 574–588.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pranab Kumar Nag
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment and Disaster ManagementRamakrishna Mission Vivekananda UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations