Advertisement

Genre and Mode in the Academic Discourse Community

  • Michael Guest
Chapter
Part of the Springer Texts in Education book series (SPTE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we will examine the socially semiotic nature of the academic conference as it is manifested in terms of genre analysis and mode. This will be examined particularly through the binary relationships of spoken vs. written modes, science vs. the humanities, and dialogue vs. monologue.

References

  1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. New York: A&C Black.Google Scholar
  4. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Corpus-based research in TESOL. Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2001). Syntactic differences in oral and written scientific discourse: The role of information structure. Asp, 31, 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation: A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASp, 39–40, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois, B. L. (1987). Something on the order of around forty to forty-four: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks. Language and Society, 16, 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudley-Evans, A. (1994). Genre analysis: An approach for text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 219–228). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  12. Heino, A., Tervonen, E., & Tommola, J. (2002). Metadiscourse in academic conference presentations. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 127–146). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  15. Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies. Special Issue on Metadiscourse. 9(2), 125–143.Google Scholar
  16. Hymes, D. H. (1966). Two types of linguistic relativity. In W. Bright (Ed.) Sociolinguistics, (pp. 114–167). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  17. Hymes, D. H. (1971). On communicative competence. In J. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.) Sociolinguistics, (pp. 269–285). Hammondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Liu, D. (2008). Linking adverbials: An across-register corpus study and its implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics., 13(4), 491–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lu, P. Y., & Corbett, J. (2012). English in medical education. Bristol, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mauranen, A. (2001). Reflexive academic talk: Observations from MICASE. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.) Corpus linguistics in North America, (pp. 165–78).Google Scholar
  21. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Science in the making: Scientific conference presentations and the construction of facts. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 51–68). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2012). Oralising text slides in scientific conference presentations: A multimodal corpus analysis. In A. Boulton, S. Carter-Thomas, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications, (pp. 135–166).Google Scholar
  23. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, S. E. (2002). ‘As the story unfolds’: The uses of narrative in research presentations. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 147–168). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  25. Ventola, E. (2002). Why and what kind of focus on conference presentations. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 15–50). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Webber, P. (2005). Interactive features in medical conference monologue. English for Specific Purposes Journal, 24(2), 157–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations