Advertisement

Transition Phrases in the Conference Presentation

  • Michael Guest
Chapter
Part of the Springer Texts in Education book series (SPTE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we will discuss one of the core elements of successful CPs, the use of considered transition phrases. In order to establish a coherent narrative flow in a CP, no element is more important than the use of explicit transitional discourse signals or markers. Their use in CPs and other formalized spoken texts had a notably positive effect upon enhancing the cohesion and holistic comprehensibility of the CP and subsequently had a more powerful impact upon the audience. These metadiscursive choices stand in sharp contrast to the often non-considered deployment of repeated, but semantically meaningless, connectives, or the mere verbalization of section headwords. These carry little pragmatic or semantic impact and thus did not offer any anchors or arrows, guideposts indicating developments or direction to listeners/viewers. Such speakers were apparently relying on the written text alone to carry the full communicative load. As a result of, or in combination with, the explicit use of transition discourse markers, the value of enhanced prosody, particularly intonation and the pacing of speech, were readily apparent. Since FP/PSs often do not allow for much kinetic flamboyance from the presenter, the onus is upon the intonation of the speaker to more explicitly indicate the rhetorical flow of the research.

References

  1. Andeweg, B. A. (2009). Suggestion of structure: An experiment with transition sentences. Professional Communication Conference Proceedings, 2009. IEEE International, pp. 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2009.5208722.
  2. Anthony, L., Orr, T., & Yamasaki, A. (2007). Signaling transitions in oral presentations: Language and strategies. Professional Communication Conference 2009 Proceedings, pp. 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ipcc.2007.4464052
  3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Carter-Thomas, S., & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation: A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. ASp, 39–40, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heino, A., Tervonen, E., & Tommola, J. (2002). Metadiscourse in academic conference presentations. In E. Ventola, C. Shalom, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of conferencing (pp. 127–146). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Luukka, M. R. (1992). Academic metadiscourse: Textual, interpersonal and contextual features of academic texts. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.Google Scholar
  7. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, S. E. E. (1998). Why ask questions in monologues? Language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk. In S. Hunston (Ed.), Language at work (pp. 137–150). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Vande Kopple, W. J. (1995). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Compositions and Communication, 36, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zareva, A. (2009). Informational packaging, level of formality, and the use of circumstance adverbials in L1 and L2 student academic presentations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zareva, A. (2011). ‘And so that was it’: Linking adverbials in student academic presentations. RELC Journal, 42(1), 5–15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210390664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MiyazakiMiyazakiJapan

Personalised recommendations