Case Studies and Future Prospects of Soil Remediation Strategies

  • Bhupendra Koul
  • Pooja Taak


Soil remediation strategies are subjected to the quality and quantity of the contaminant(s) as well as geographical conditions of the target site. There is no single soil remediation method that can aid as a ‘silver bullet’ to restore the environmental deterioration without any residual effect. For successful soil remediation different physical, chemical and biological strategies can be implemented in an integrated way. This chapter encompasses various case studies related to the implementation of remediation strategies on a large scale. This chapter also focuses on the explicit information and recent advances on the available soil treatment techniques and their future prospects. Thus, the ideal soil remediation strategies ensure environmental protection by using natural resources for sustainable soil remediation which is economically and environmentally beneficial for the society.


Soil contamination Soil washing Windrows Bioventing Microbial degradation Chemical oxidation 


  1. Adelaja O, Keshavarz T, Kyazze G (2014) Enhanced biodegradation of phenanthrene using different inoculum types in a microbial fuel cell. Eng Life Sci 14(2):218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azubuike CC, Chikere CB, Okpokwasili GC (2016) Bioremediation techniques-classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32(11):180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouhajja E, Agathos SN, George IF (2016) Metagenomics: probing pollutant fate in natural and engineered ecosystems. Biotechnol Adv 34(8):1413–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassidy DP, Srivastava VJ, Dombrowski FJ, Lingle JW (2015) Combining in situ chemical oxidation, stabilization, and anaerobic bioremediation in a single application to reduce contaminant mass and leachability in soil. J Hazard Mater 297:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri AK (2002) Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. García-Delgado C, Alfaro-Barta I, Eymar E (2015) Combination of biochar amendment and mycoremediation for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons immobilization and biodegradation in creosote-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 285:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mol Plant-Microbe Int 17(1):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li X, Wang X, Weng L, Zhou Q, Li Y (2017) Microbial fuel cell for organic contaminated soil remedial application: a review. Energy Technol 5(8):1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marchand C (2017) Phytoremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons and trace elements. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, KalmarGoogle Scholar
  10. Martínez-Pascual E, Grotenhuis T, Solanas AM, Viñas M (2015) Coupling chemical oxidation and biostimulation: effects on the natural attenuation capacity and resilience of the native microbial community in alkylbenzene-polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 300:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Singh A, Prasad SM (2015) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: an overview on technology advancement. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12(1):353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhupendra Koul
    • 1
  • Pooja Taak
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Bioengineering & BiosciencesLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia

Personalised recommendations