Advertisement

Ex situ Soil Remediation Strategies

  • Bhupendra Koul
  • Pooja Taak
Chapter

Abstract

Ex situ techniques involves the treatment of contaminated soil, away from the polluted site. Ex situ bioremediation can be operated in two ways which include solid phase bioremediation and slurry phase bioremediation. Besides its high cost, these techniques are highly efficient, easy to control, faster and have great potential to treat large number of contaminants from the soil. Ex situ techniques involve land farming, biopile, windrow, soil washing, composting, bioreactor, ion exchange, adsorption/absorption, pyrolysis and ultrasound technology. These techniques can be successfully applied for the treatment of fuel hydrocarbons, halogenated and non-halogenated organic compounds as well as for various pesticides.

Keywords

Ex situ Composting Bioreactor Land farming Pyrolysis 

References

  1. Abramov VO, Mullakaev MS, Abramova AV, Esipov IB, Mason TJ (2013) Ultrasonic technology for enhanced oil recovery from failing oil wells and the equipment for its implementation. Ultrason Sonochem 20:1289–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adewuyi YG (2001) Sonochemistry: environmental science and engineering applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4681–4715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexandratos SD (2008) Ion-exchange resins: a retrospective from industrial and engineering. Indus Eng Chem Res 48(1):388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arvanitoyannis IS, Kassaveti A, Stefanatos S (2007) Current and potential uses of thermally treated olive oil waste. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:852–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr D (2002) Biological methods for assessment and remediation of contaminated land: case studies. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bastida F, Jehmlich N, Lima K, Morris BEL, Richnow HH, Hernandez T, von Bergen M, Garcia C (2016) The ecological and physiological responses of the microbial community from a semiarid soil to hydrocarbon contamination and its bioremediation using compost amendment. J Proteome 135:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beril Gonder Z, Kaya Y, Vergili I, Barlas H (2006) Capacity loss in an organically fouled anion exchanger. Desalination 189:303–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besaltatpour A, Hajabbasi M, Khoshgoftarmanesh A, Dorostkar V (2011) Landfarming process effects on biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soils. Soil Sediment Cont Int J 20:234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerqueira VS, Peralba MR, Camargo FAO, Bento FM (2014) Comparison of bioremediation strategies for soil impacted with petrochemical oily sludge. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 95:338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulon F, Al Awadi M, Cowie W, Mardlin D, Pollard S, Cunningham C, Risdon G, Arthur P, Semple KT, Paton GI (2010) When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopile and windrowed soils contaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial. Environ Pollut 158:3032–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Couto MNPFS, Basto MCP, Vasconcelos MTSD (2012) Suitability of Scirpus maritimus for petroleum hydrocarbons remediation in a refinery environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cserhati T, Forgács E, Oros G (2002) Biological activity and environmental impact of anionic surfactants. Environ Int 28:337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das N, Chandran P (2011) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnol Res Int 2011:1Google Scholar
  14. de Almeida DG, da Silva MDGC, do Nascimento Barbosa R, Silva DDSP, da Silva RO, de Souza Lima GM, de Gusmão NB, de Queiroz MDFV (2017) Biodegradation of marine fuel MF-380 by microbial consortium isolated from seawater near the petrochemical Suape Port, Brazil. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 116:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Debela F, Thring R, Arocena J (2012) Immobilization of heavy metals by co-pyrolysis of contaminated soil with woody biomass. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:1161–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delille D, Duval A, Pelletier E (2008) Highly efficient pilot biopiles for on-site fertilization treatment of diesel oil-contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Cold Reg Sci Technol 54:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dias RL, Ruberto L, Calabro A, Balbo AL, Del Panno MT, Mac Cormack WP (2015) Hydrocarbon removal and bacterial community structure in on-site biostimulated biopile systems designed for bioremediation of diesel-contaminated Antarctic soil. Polar Biol 38:677–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Doong RA, Wu YW, Lei WG (1998) Surfactant enhanced remediation of cadmium contaminated soils. Water Sci Technol 37(8):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elgh-Dalgren K, Arwidsson Z, Camdzija A, Sjöberg R, Ribé V, Waara S, Allard B, von Kronhelm T, van Hees PAW (2009) Laboratory and pilot scale soil washing of PAH and arsenic from a wood preservation site: changes in concentration and toxicity. J Hazard Mater 172:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evankovic T, Hrenović J (2010) Surfactants in the environment. Arch Ind Hyg Toxicol 61:95–110Google Scholar
  21. Evans CV (2003) Removal of heavy metals and radionuclides from soils using cationic surfactant flushing. University of Wisconsin Water Resources Institute, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  22. Fabbri D, Prevot AB, Zelano V, Ginepro M, Pramauro E (2008) Removal and degradation of aromatic compounds from a highly polluted site by coupling soil washing with photocatalysis. Chemosphere 71:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flores R, Blass G, Domínguez V (2007) Soil remediation by an advanced oxidative method assisted with ultrasonic energy. J Hazard Mater 140:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fountain JC, Starr RC, Middleton T, Beikirch M, Taylor C, Hodge D (1996) A controlled field test of surfactant-enhanced aquifer remediation. Groundwater 34:910–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. FRTR (2012) Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide version 4.0 – remediation technology. Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  26. Gadelle F, Wan JM, Tokunaga TK (2001) Removal of Uranium(VI) from contaminated sediments by surfactants. J Environ Qual 30:470–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Giannis A, Gidarakos E, Skouta A (2007) Application of sodium dodecyl sulfate and humic acid as surfactants on electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Desalin 211:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harmer MA, Sun Q (2001) Solid acid catalysis using ion-exchange resins. Appl Catal A 221:45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. He Z, Siripornadulsil S, Sayre RT, Tarina TJ, Weavers LK (2011) Removal of sedimentary ultrasound combined with biomass (transgenic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii). Chemosphere 83:1249–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobson AM, Frederickson J, Dise NB (2005) CH4 and N2O from mechanically turned windrow and vermicomposting systems following in-vessel pre-treatment. Waste Manag 25:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huguenot D, Mousset E, van Hullebusch ED, Oturan MA (2015) Combination of surfactant enhanced soil washing and electro-Fenton process for the treatment of soils contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons. J Environ Manag 153:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inguanzo M, Domınguez A, Menendez J, Blanco C, Pis J (2002) On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge: the influence of pyrolysis conditions on solid, liquid and gas fractions. J Anal Appl Pyrol 63:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ioannou-Ttofa L, Michael-Kordatou I, Fattas SC, Eusebio A, Ribeiro B, Rusan M, Amer ARB, Zuraiqi S, Waismand M, Linder C, Wiesman Z, Gilron J, Fatta-Kassinos D (2017) Treatment efficiency and economic feasibility of biological oxidation, membrane filtration and separation processes, and advanced oxidation for the purification and valorization of olive mill wastewater. Water Res 114:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iturbe R, Flores C, Chavez C, Bautista G, Tortes LG (2004) Remediation of contaminated soil using soil washing and biopile methodologies at a field level. J Soils Sediment 4:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jia LQ, Ou ZQ, Ouyang ZY (2005) Ecological behavior of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) in soil-plant systems. Pedosphere 15:216–224Google Scholar
  36. Kazi TG, Jamali MK, Siddiqui A, Kazi GH, Arain MB, Afridi HI (2006) An ultrasonic assisted extraction method to release heavy metals from untreated sewage sludge samples. Chemosphere 63:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khalladia R, Benhabilesa O, Bentahara F, Moulai-Mostefa N (2009) Surfactant remediation of diesel fuel polluted soil. J Hazard Mater 164:1179–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim SO, Kim WS, Kim KW (2005) Evaluation of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic contaminated soils. Environ Geochem Health 27:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim BK, Baek K, Ko SH, Yang JW (2011) Research and field experiences on electrokinetic remediation in South Korea. Sep Purif Technol 79:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee M, Kang H, Do W (2005) Application of nonionic surfactant-enhanced in situ flushing to a diesel contaminated site. Water Res 39:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee DH, Chang HW, Kim C (2008) Mixing effect of NaCl and surfactant on the remediation of TCB contaminated soil. Geosci J 12:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lorenzen L, Van Deventer JSJ, Landi WM (1995) Factors affecting the mechanism of the adsorption of arsenic species on activated carbon. Min Eng 8(4–5):557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lukić B, Panico A, Huguenot D, Fabbricino M, van Hullebusch ED, Esposito G (2017) A review on the efficiency of landfarming integrated with composting as a soil remediation treatment. Environ Technol Rev 6(1):94–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maila MP, Colete TE (2004) Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons through land farming: are simplicity and cost-effectiveness the only advantages? Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 3:349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mann MJ (1999) Full-scale and pilot-scale soil washing. J Hazard Mater 66(1):119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, Yu J (2015) Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review. J Hazard Mater 285:419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mason TJ, Collings A, Sumel A (2004) Sonic and ultrasonic removal of chemical contaminants from soil in the laboratory and on a large scale. Ultrason Sonochem 11:205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mergen MRD, Jefferson B, Parsons SA, Jarvis P (2008) Magnetic ion-exchange resin treatment: impact of water type and resin use. Water Res 42:1977–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH (2006) Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuel 20:848–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environ Pollut 133:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF (2001) An evaluation of technologies for the heavy metal remediation of dredged sediments. J Hazard Mater 85(1):145–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Navarro P, Alguacil FJ (2002) Adsorption of antimony and arsenic from a copper electrorefining solution onto activated carbon. Hydrometallurgy 66(1–3):101–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nguyen YT, Kieu HT, West S, Dang YT, Horn H (2017) Community structure of a sulfate-reducing consortium in lead-contaminated wastewater treatment process. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33(1):10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nikolopoulou M, Pasadakis N, Norf H, Kalogerakis N (2013) Enhanced ex situ bioremediation of crude oil contaminated beach sand by supplementation with nutrients and rhamnolipids. Mar Pollut Bull 77:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ochoa-Loza FJ, Artiola JF, Maier RM (2001) Stability constants for the complexation of various metals with a rhamnolipid biosurfactant. J Environ Qual 30:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pacwa-Plociniczak M, Plaza GA, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Cameotra SS (2011) Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci 12:633–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paladino G, Arrigoni JP, Satti P, Morelli I, Mora V, Laos F (2016) Bioremediation of heavily hydrocarbon-contaminated drilling wastes by composting. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13(9):2227–2238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paria S (2008) Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 138:24–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pham TD, Shrestha RA, Virkutyte J, Sillanpaa M (2009) Combined ultrasonication and electrokinetic remediation for persistent organic removal from contaminated kaolin. Electrochim Acta 54:1403–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Philp JC, Atlas RM (2005) Bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers. In: Atlas RM, Philp JC (eds) Bioremediation: applied microbial solutions for real-world environmental cleanup. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington, DC, pp 139–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pintar A, Batista J, Levec J (2001) Catalytic denitrification: direct and indirect removal of nitrates from potable water. Catal Today 66:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prokop G, Schamann M, Edelgaard I (2000) Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe. European Environment Agency, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  63. Rahman PKSM, Gakpe E (2008) Production, characterisation and applications of biosurfactants-review. Biotechnology 7:360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rahman SF, Kantor RS, Huddy R, Thomas BC, van Zyl AW, Harrison ST, Banfield JF (2017) Genome-resolved metagenomics of a bioremediation system for degradation of thiocyanate in mine water containing suspended solid tailings. Microbiol Open 6(3):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rajaković LV (1992) The sorption of arsenic onto activated carbon impregnated with metallic silver and copper. Sep Sci Technol 27(11):1423–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ramsburg CA, Pennell KD, Abriola LM, Daniels G, Drummond CD, Gamache M, Hsu HI, Petrovskis EA, Rathfelder KM, Ryder JL, Yavaraski TP (2005) Pilot-Scale demonstration of surfactant-enhanced pce solubilization at the bachman road site. 2. system operation and evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 39:1791–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ranjan RS, Qian Y, Krishnapillai M (2006) Effects of electrokinetics and cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide [ctab] on the hydrocarbon removal and retention from contaminated soils. Environ Technol 27:767–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rengaraj S, Joo CY, Kim Y, Yi J (2003) Kinetics of removal of chromium from water and electronic process wastewater by ion exchange resins: 1200H, 1500H and IRN97H. J Hazard Mater 102:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Renshaw CE, Zynda GD, Fountain JC (1997) Permeability reductions induced by sorption of surfactant. Water Resour Res 33:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robles-González IV, Fava F, Poggi-Varaldo HM (2008) A review on slurry bioreactors for bioremediation of soils and sediments. Microb Cell Factories 7(5):1–16Google Scholar
  71. Rodrıguez-Rodrıguez CE, Marco-Urrea E, Caminal G (2010) Degradation of naproxen and carbamazepine in spiked sludge by slurry and solid-phase Trametes versicolor systems. Bioresour Technol 101:2259–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rofiqul Islam M, Haniu H, Rafiqul Alam Beg M (2008) Liquid fuels and chemicals from pyrolysis of motorcycle tire waste: product yields, compositions and related properties. Fuel 87:3112–3122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosas JM, Vicente F, Santos A, Romero A (2011) Enhancing p-cresol extraction from soil. Chemosphere 84:260–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Salati S, Papa G, Adani F (2011) Perspective on the use of humic acids from biomass as natural surfactants for industrial applications. Biotechnol Adv 29:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sanscartier D, Zeeb B, Koch I, Reimer K (2009) Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil by heated and humidified biopile system in cold climates. Cold Reg Sci Technol 55:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Santonicola MG, Lenhoff AM, Kaler EW (2008) Binding of alkyl polyglucoside surfactants to bacteriorhodopsin and its relation to protein stability. Biophys J 94:3647–3658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shiau BJB, Brammer JM, Sabatini DA, Harwell JH, Knox RC (2003) Recent development of low concentration surfactant flushing for napl-impacted site remediation and pollution prevention, petroleum hydrocarbons and organic chemicals in ground water/prevention, assessment, and remediation twentieth annual conference and exposition, Costa Mesa, CAGoogle Scholar
  78. Silva-Castro GA, Uad I, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Fandino CG, Toledo FL, Calvo C (2012) Application of selected microbial consortia combined with inorganic and oleophilic fertilizers to recuperate oil-polluted soil using land farming technology. Clean Techn Environ Policy 14:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Silva-Castro GA, Uad I, Rodrıguez-Calvo A, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Calvo C (2015) Response of autochthonous microbiota of diesel polluted soils to land- farming treatments. Environ Res 137:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Slizovskiy IB, Kelsey JW, Hatzinger PB (2011) Surfactant-facilitated remediation of metal-contaminated soils: efficacy and toxicological consequences to earthworms. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Srinivasan R, Sorial GA (2009) Treatment of perchlorate in drinking water: a critical review. Sep Purif Technol 69:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stals M, Carleer R, Reggers G, Schreurs S, Yperman J (2010) Flash pyrolysis of heavy metal contaminated hardwoods from phytoremediation: characterisation of biomass, pyrolysis oil and char/ash fraction. J Anal Appl Pyrol 89:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Strbak L (2000) In situ flushing with surfactants and cosolvents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, reportGoogle Scholar
  84. Su L, Zhou H, Guo G, Zhao A, Zhao Y (2012) Anaerobic biodegradation of PAH in river sediment treated with different additives. Procedia Environ Sci 16:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Svab M, Kubal M, Müllerova M, Raschman R (2009) Soil flushing by surfactant solution: pilot-scale demonstration of complete technology. J Hazard Mater 163:410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Swarnkar V, Agrawal N, Tomar R (2012) Sorption of chromate and arsenate by surfactant modified erionite (E-SMZ). J Dispers Sci Technol 33:919–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Taiwo AM, Gbadebo AM, Oyedepo JA, Ojekunle ZO, Alo OM, Oyeniran AA, Onalaja OJ, Ogunjimi D, Taiwo OT (2016) Bioremediation of industrially contaminated soil using compost and plant technology. J Hazard Mater 304:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Thangavadivel K (2010) Development and application of ultrasound technology for treatment of organic pollutants. PhD thesis, University of South Australia, Adelaide SAGoogle Scholar
  89. Thuan NT, Chang MB (2012) Investigation of the degradation of pentachlorophenol in sandy soil via low-temperature pyrolysis. J Hazard Mater 229–230:411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Torres LG, Lopez RB, Beltran M (2012) Removal of As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn from a highly contaminated industrial soil using surfactant enhanced soil washing. Phys Chem Earth 37–39:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Cost and performance report for LNAPL characterization and remediation. U.S. Environmental Protectoin Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  92. Uddin MJ, Aditya Sagar G, Jagdeeshwar J (2017) Soil pollution and soil remediation techniques. IJARIIT 3(1):582–593Google Scholar
  93. US EPA (2012) About remediation technologies. US EPA office of superfund remediation and technology innovation (CLU-IN), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  94. Venderbosch RH, Prins W (2010) Fast pyrolysis technology development. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4(2):178–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vilensky MY, Berkowitz B, Warshawsky A (2002) In situ remediation of groundwater contaminated by heavy and transition metal ions by ion exchange methods. Environ Sci Technol 36:1851–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Volpe A, DArpa S, Del Moro G, Rossetti S, Tandoi V, Uricchio VF (2012) Fingerprinting hydrocarbons in a contaminated soil from an Italian natural reserve and assessment of the performance of a low-impact bioremediation approach. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:1773–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vreysen S, Maes A (2005) Remediation of a diesel contaminated, sandy-loam soil using low concentrated surfactant solutions. J Soils Sed 5:240–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Whelan MJ, Coulon F, Hince G, Rayner J, McWatters R, Spedding T, Snape I (2015) Fate and transport of petroleum hydrocarbons in engineered biopiles in polar regions. Chemosphere 131:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wick AF, Haus NW, Sukkariyah BF, Haering KC, Daniels WL (2011) Remediation of PAH-contaminated soils and sediments: a literature review. CSES Department, internal research document 102Google Scholar
  100. Willms C, Li Z, Allen L, Evans CV (2004) Desorption of cesium from kaolinite and illite using alkylammonium salts. Appl Clay Sci 25:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Woodberry P, Stevens G, Northcott K, Snape I, Stark S (2007) Field trial of ion-exchange resin columns for removal of metal contaminants, Thala valley tip, Casey station, Antarctica. Cold Reg Sci Technol 48:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Xu J, Yuan X, Dai S (2006) Effect of surfactants on desorption of aldicarb from spiked soil. Chemosphere 62:1630–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Zhang W, Tsang DC, Lo IM (2007) Removal of Pb and MDF from contaminated soils by EDTA-and SDS-enhanced washing. Chemosphere 66(11):2025–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhang LJ, Zhang Y, Liu DH (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated by heavy metals with different amelioration materials. Soil 41(3):420–424Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhupendra Koul
    • 1
  • Pooja Taak
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Bioengineering & BiosciencesLovely Professional UniversityPhagwaraIndia

Personalised recommendations