Advertisement

Denoising of Brain MRI Images Using a Hybrid Filter Method of Sylvester-Lyapunov Equation and Non Local Means

  • Krishna Kumar SharmaEmail author
  • Dheeraj Gurjar
  • Monika Jyotyana
  • Vinod Kumari
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 851)

Abstract

Medical imaging is playing an effective role in diagnosing diseases noninvasively. There are many denoising filters, but previous filters have not attained the desirable results. Denoising techniques have to be applied in such a way that, they preserve and enhance diagnostic relevant information of the MRI images. Therefore noise reduction has always been a challenge for researchers. A hybrid denoising technique based on Sylvester-Lyapunov Equation and Non Local Means method has been proposed in this work. This hybrid denoising technique has been compared with the existing techniques of denoising by varying noise levels in brain images of Brainweb dataset and real dataset. Efficiency of methods have been discussed by measuring PSNR and SSIM coefficients.

Keywords

MRI NLM Denoising PSNR SSIM 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to thank UGC for funding this work under the category of Minor Research Project. We would like to thank University of Kota, Kota for supporting and providing resources to complete this work. We also thank to dr. dheeraj sharma, medical officer, Govt. of Rajasthan, India for helping in this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Jost, G., Lenhard, D.C., Sieber, M.A., Lohrke, J., Frenzel, T., Pietsch, H.: Signal increase on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the rat brain after repeated, extended doses of gadolinium-based contrast agents: comparison of linear and macrocyclic agents Investigative radiology. Wolters Kluwer Health 51, 83 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shiroishi, M.S., Castellazzi, G., Boxerman, J.L., D’amore, F., Essig, M., Nguyen, T.B., Provenzale, J.M., Enterline, D.S., Anzalone, N., Drfler, A., & others: Principles of T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI technique in brain tumor imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 41, 296–313 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yi, Z., Li, X., Xue, Z., Liang, X., Lu, W., Peng, H., Liu, H., Zeng, S., Hao, J.: Remarkable NIR enhancement of multifunctional nanoprobes for in vivo trimodal bioimaging and upconversion optical/T2-weighted MRI-guided small tumor diagnosis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 7119–7129 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoshioka, H., Philipp, M., Schlechtweg, K.K.: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Imaging Arthritis Metab. Bone Dis., 34–48 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gravel, P., Beaudoin, G., De Guise, J.A.: A method for modeling noise in medical images. IEEE Transa. Med. Imaging 23, 1221–1232 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Preza, M.G., Concib, A., Morenoc, A.B., Andaluza, Vi. H., Hernindezd, J.A.: Estimating the Rician noise level in brain MR image ANDESCON, 2014 IEEE, pp. 1–1 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sijbers, J., den Dekker, A.J., Scheunders, P., Van Dyck, D.: Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 357–361 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klosowski, J., Frahm, J.: Image denoising for real-time MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 77(3), 1340–1352 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ali, H.M.: MRI medical image denoising by fundamental filters. In: High-Resolution Neuroimaging-Basic Physical Principles and Clinical Applications. InTech (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manjon, J.V.: MRI preprocessing. In: Imaging Biomarkers , pp. 53–63. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.-M.: A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4, 490–530 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rajan, J., Jeurissen, B., Verhoye, M., Van Audekerke, J., Sijbers, J.: Maximum likelihood estimation-based denoising of magnetic resonance images using restricted local neighborhoods. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 5221 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coup, P., Yger, P., Prima, S., Hellier, P., Kervrann, C., Barillot, C.: An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3-D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27, 425–441 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Manjn, J.V., Coup, P., Marti-Bonmati, L., Collins, D.L., Robles, M.: Adaptive non-local means denoising of MR images with spatially varying noise levels. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31, 192–203 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coup, P., Manjn, J.V., Robles, M., Collins, D.L.: Adaptive multiresolution non-local means filter for three-dimensional magnetic resonance image denoising. IET Image Process. 6, 558–568 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manjn, J.V., Coup, P., Buades, A., Collins, D.L., Robles, M.: New methods for MRI denoising based on sparseness and self-similarity. Med. Image A.nal 16, 18–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vatsa, M., Singh, R., Noore, A.: Denoising and segmentation of 3D brain images. IPCV 9, 561–567 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanches, J.M., Nascimento, J.C., Marques, J.S.: Medical image noise reduction using the Sylvester-Lyapunov equation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 1522–1539 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwan, R.-S., Evans, A.C., Pike, G.B.: MRI simulation-based evaluation of image-processing and classification methods. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 1085–1097 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krishna Kumar Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dheeraj Gurjar
    • 2
  • Monika Jyotyana
    • 3
  • Vinod Kumari
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of CSIUniversity of KotaKotaIndia
  2. 2.Department of CSEMadhav Institute of Technology & ScienceGwaliorIndia
  3. 3.Department of CSCURAJKishangarhIndia
  4. 4.University of KotaKotaIndia

Personalised recommendations