Advertisement

Action Research Aimed at Contextualizing Partnership in Irrigation Water Management in South Sulawesi, Indonesia

  • Kazuko OguniEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the process and outcomes of action research on irrigation management in Sulawesi, Indonesia. The objectives of the research were to provide an opportunity for old and new stakeholders to meet, discuss, and make decisions together and to provide experience of using interactive processes in implementing agreed-upon solutions. By jointly experiencing challenges and successes based on mutual decision-making with moderate support from the researchers, a space for participation and creating contextualized roles and responsibilities was formed based on the sociocultural situation. Moreover, this occurred regardless of whether the participant was on the “governing” or “governed” side. This chapter addresses the dynamic integration of local customs and government-led systems facing mutual discontinuity, which is a concern from the cultural perspective of interactive governance.

Keywords

Action research Indonesia South Sulawesi Local context Participatory irrigation management Collaborative interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Fieldwork for this study was jointly conducted with the support of Dr. Dorotea Agnes Rampisela and her NGO, “Pelangi.” The author is deeply grateful to the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature and the co-researchers of the joint research project (2011–2015) for their permission to use the data in this paper. All discussion within this paper is, however, entirely the responsibility of the author.

References

  1. Assegaf, Abd Kadir. 2008. Kitab Lontara Syekh Yusuf. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi.Google Scholar
  2. Edelenbos, Jurian. 2016. Introduction: Three Reflecting Perspectives on Interactive Governance. In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance, Self-organization and Participation in Public Governance, ed. J. Edelenbos and Ingmar Van Meerkerk. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edelenbos, J., N. Schie, and L. Gerrits. 2010. Organizing Interfaces Between Government Institutions and Interactive Governance. Policy Sciences 43: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kulle, Dg., Syarifuddin, and Zainuddin Tika. 2008a. Aksara Lontara Makassar 1. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi.Google Scholar
  5. Kulle, Dg., Syarifuddin, and Zainuddin Tika. 2008b. Aksara Lontara Makassar 2. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi.Google Scholar
  6. Long, Norman. 2001. Development Sociology, Actor Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Long, Norman, and A. Long, eds. 1992. Battlefields of Knowledge. The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Otsuka, Kenji, ed. 2016. Interactive Approach to Water Governance: Case Studies in Asia (Interim Report). Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  9. Torfing, Jacob, B. Guy Peters, Jon Pierre, and Eva Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Goverance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yamori, Katsuya. 2010. Action Research, Practical Human Science. Tokyo: Shinyosha.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of International Welfare DevelopmentNihon Fukushi UniversityAichiJapan

Personalised recommendations