Advertisement

A Fault Detection Method for Non-Gaussian Industrial Processes via Joint KICA and FVS

  • Li Zhang
  • Xinying Zhong
  • Yi Chai
  • Ke Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 528)

Abstract

The data in industrial processes have the features of non-linear and non-Gaussian. In order to enhance the accuracy of fault detection for industrial processes, and to reduce the calculation time consumption, a method is proposed to combine the joint kernel independent component analysis and the feature vector selection (FVS) to achieve fault detection in this paper. Firstly, the joint kernel function of Gaussian radial basis kernel function and polynomial kernel function is used to improve the learning and generalization ability of kernel independent component analysis (KICA) algorithm, and this can be employed to improve the accuracy of fault detection. Secondly, FVS is given to reduce the computational complexity of Joint KICA, especially in the case of large sample size. Finally, the simulation results of Tennessee Eastman (TE) process can be used to verify the effectiveness of this proposed method.

Keywords

Kernel independent component analysis Feature vector selection TE process Fault detection 

References

  1. 1.
    V. Venkatasubramanian, Prognostic and diagnostic monitoring of complex systems for product lifecycle management: challenges and opportunities. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29(6), 1253–1263 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Ke, Z. Donghua, C. Yi, Review of multiple fault diagnosis methods. Control Theory Appl. 32(9), 1143–1157 (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Bing, Y. Chunmei, L. Qiang, Fault diagnosis for process industry (Science Press, 2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Han, X. Deyun, Survey on data driven fault diagnosis methods. Control Dec. 26(1), 1–9 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Rongxing, Z. Huilin, A new fault diagnosis method based on fault tree and Bayesian networks. Energy Proc. 17(17), 1376–1382 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Tipping, Sparse kernel principal component analysis. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 633–639 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Jingyu, H. Jianbing, L. Yuan, X. Jinxue, Fault diagnosis of complex chemical process based on local fisher discriminant analysis. Appl. Res. Comput. 35(4) (2018). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1196.tp.20170401.1738.038.html
  8. 8.
    L. Qiang, Q.S. Joe, C. Tianyou, Decentralized fault diagnosis of continuous annealing processes based on multilevel PCA. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10(3), 687–698 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.M. Lee, C.K. Yoo, I.B. Lee, Statistical process monitoring with independent component analysis. Process Control 14, 467–485 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. George Stefatos, B. Hamza, Dynamic independent component analysis approach for fault detection and diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(12), 8606–8617 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Saitoh, Theory of reproducing kernels. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 68(3), 337–404 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.R. Bach, M.I. Jordan, Kernel independent component analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1–48 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Mingxing, X. Hengyuan, L. Xiaofei et al., The optimization of the kind and parameters of kernel function in KPCA for process monitoring. Comput. Chem. Eng. 46(15), 94–104 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Zeyu, W. Peiliang, Fault detection method for non-linear systems based on kernel independent component analysis and support vector data description. Inf. Control 46(2), 153–158 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Hongyan, H. Daoping, Kernel principal component analysis based on feature vector selection. Comput. Sci. 36(7), 185–255 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Peiling, L. Junhong, W. Guizeng, Improved kernel principal component analysis for fault detection. Expert Syst. Appl. 2(34), 1210–1219 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.-M. Lee, S.J. Qin, I.B. Lee, Fault detection of non-linear processes using kernel independent component analysis. Canad. J. Chem. Eng. 85(4), 526–536 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Saitoh, Theory of reproducing kernels. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 68(3), 337–404 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Hyvärinen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis: algorithm and applications. Neural Netw. 13(4–5), 411–430 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Hyvärinen, Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. 10, 1129–1159 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.-M. Lee, C.K. Yoo, S.W. Choi et al., Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59(1), 223–234 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.Yingmin, Alternative proofs for improved LMI representations for the analysis and the design of continuous-time systems with polytopic type uncertainty: a predictive approach. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48(8), 1413–1416 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Z.I. Botev, J.F. Grotowski, D.P. Kroese, Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann. Stat. 38(5), 2916–2957 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Baudat, F. Anouar, Kernel-based methods and function approximation, in Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Networks (Washington DC, 2001), pp. 1244–1249Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Baudat, F. Anouar, Feature vector selection and projection using kernels. Neurocomputing 55, 21–38 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Yingmin, Robust control with decoupling performance for steering and traction of 4WS vehicles under velocity-varying motion. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 8(3), 554–569 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Zidan, M. Khairalla, A.M. Abdrabou et al., Fault detection, isolation, and service restoration in distribution systems: state-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 24(5), 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Complex System Safety and Control, Ministry of EducationChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations