Numerical Investigation of Two-Phase Flow Induced Local Fluctuations and Interactions of Flow Properties Through Elbow

  • Nkemjika Mirian Chinenye-KanuEmail author
  • Mamdud Hossain
  • Mohamad Ghazi Droubi
  • Sheikh Zahidul Islam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The local interactions and fluctuations of multiphase flow properties present in upward slug/churn flow patterns through a 90\(^0\) pipe bend has been investigated. Numerical modelling technique using the Volume of Fluid method (VOF) and Reynolds Averaged Naiver-Stokes equation (RANS) was used in this study. Validation of the modelling approach was carried out using the void fraction signals from the simulation and its PDF result. These signals compared well with reported experimental results for slug and churn flow patterns. Result analysis which focused on velocity and pressure fluctuations at three different cross-sectional planes of the elbow showed a reduction in the fluctuation energy (PSD) of the velocity signal at the downstream locations compared to the upstream. Similar behaviour was seen in the pressure signal. The observation was attributed to the change in multiphase flow patterns from slug to stratified/stratified wavy flow pattern after the bend. The results from this study intend to inform enhanced description of the local fluctuations of slug geometry, density and frequency for the accurate prediction of flow induced fluctuating forces due to slug-churn turbulent flows at pipe bends.


CFD Void fraction Pressure and velocity variations Flow induced local fluctuations Flow properties interactions 


  1. 1.
    Gharaibah, E., Barri, M., Tungen, R.: Flow Induced Vibration for Design and Operation of Subsea Systems-State of the Art, Limitations and Potential Developments. Offshore Technology Conference Asia. Offshore Technology Conference (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meng, S., Kajiwara, H., Zhang, W.: Internal flow effect on the cross-flow vortex-induced vibration of a cantilevered pipe discharging fluid. Ocean Eng. 137, 120128 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, Y., Miwa, S., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Morita, H., Kondoh, Y., Tanimoto, K.: Experimental study of internal two-phase flow induced fluctuating force on a 90 elbow. Chem. Eng. Sci. 76, 173187 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miwa, S., Mori, M., Hibiki, T.: Two-phase flow induced vibration in piping systems. Progress Nuclear Energy 78, 270284 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gao, Z., Yang, Y., Zhai, L., Ding, M., Jin, N.: Characterizing slug to churn flow transition by using multivariate pseudo Winger distribution and multivariate multiscale entropy. Chem. Eng. J. 291, 74–81 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costa, C., Oliveira, P., Barbosa, J.: Intermittent flow initiation in a horizontal tube: quantitative visualization and CFD analysis. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 188 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pour, S.S., Mohanarangam, K., Vahaji, S., Cheung, S.C.P., Tu, J.: Visualization of gas-liquid bubbly flows in a large diameter pipe with 90\(^0\) bendGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gayet, C., Ndiaye, M., Lin, A.: Behaviour of slug flow and pressure force induced in a spool: numerical simulation of a taylor bubble flowing in a liquid flow through a spool, 16th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emmerson, P., Lewis, M., Barton, N.: Improving boundary conditions for multiphase CFD predictions of slug flow induced forces. In: 17th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parsi, M., Vieira, R.E., Agrawal, M., Srinivasan, V., Mclaury, B.S., Shirazi, S.A., Schleicher, E., Hampel, U.: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of multiphase flow and validating using wire mesh sensor. In: 17th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology. BHR Group (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parsi, M., Agrawal, M., Srinivasan, V., Vieira, R., Torres, C., McLaury, B., Shirazi, S., Schleicher, E., Hampel, U.: Assessment of a hybrid CFD model for simulation of complex vertical upward gas-liquid churn flow. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 105, 71–84 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdulkadir, M., Hernandez-Perez, V., Lo, S., Lowndes, I.S., Azzopardi, B.J.: Comparison of experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of slug flow in a vertical riser. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 68, 468483 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Araujo, J.D.P., Miranda, J.M., Campos, J.B.L.M.: Flow of two consecutive taylor bubbles through a vertical column of stagnant liquida CFD study about the influence of the leading bubble on the hydrodynamics of the trailing one. Chem. Eng. Sci. 97, 1633 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Da Riva, E., Del Col, D.: Numerical simulation of churn flow in a vertical pipe. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64(17), 3753–3765 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ratkovich, N., Majumder, S., Bentzen, T.R.: Empirical correlations and CFD simulations of vertical two-phase gas liquid (Newtonian and non-Newtonian) slug flow compared against experimental data of void fraction. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91(6), 988–998 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakamura, T., Shiraishi, T., Ishitani, Y.,Watakabe, H., Sago, H., Fujii, T., Yamaguchi, A., Konomura, M.: Flow induced vibration of a large-diameter elbow piping based on random force measurement caused by conveying fluid (visualization test results). In: Proceedings of PVP2005, 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Denver, Colorado USA, 17–21 July (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Riverin, J.L., De Langre, E., Pettigrew, M.J.: Fluctuating forces caused by internal two-phase flow on bends and tees. J. Sound Vib. 298, 1088–1098 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishii, M., Hibiki, T.: Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer, New York (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Youngs, D.L.: Time-dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion, Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics (1982)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Versteeg, H.K., Malalasekera, W.: An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, The Finite Volume Method, 2nd edn. Pearson, England (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B.: The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 3, 269–289 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lowe, D.C., Rezkallah, K.S.: Flow regime identification in microgravity two-phase flows using void fraction signals. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 25, 433–457 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costigan, G., Whalley, P.B.: Slug flow identification from dynamic void fraction measurements in vertical air-water flows. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 23(2), 263–282 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Montoya, G., Lucas, D., Baglietto, E., Liao, Y.: A review on mechanisms and models for the churn-turbulent flow regime. Chem. Eng. Sci. 141, 86–103 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abdulkadir, M., Hernandez-Perez, V., Lo, S., Lowndes, I.S., Azzopardi, B.J.: Comparison of experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of slug flow in a vertical 90 bend. J. Comput. Multiph. Flows 5(4), 265–281 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nkemjika Mirian Chinenye-Kanu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mamdud Hossain
    • 1
  • Mohamad Ghazi Droubi
    • 1
  • Sheikh Zahidul Islam
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringRobert Gordon UniversityAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations