Advertisement

Controlling of Non-minimum Phase System Using Harmony Search Algorithm

  • Vivek Kumar Jaiswal
  • Anurag SinghEmail author
  • Shekhar Yadav
  • Shyam Krishna Nagar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 847)

Abstract

In this paper, a non-minimum phase system with dead time is controlled by intending the optimized proportional, integral, and derivative controller (PIDC). A system problem is formulated to the non-minimum phase system in which zeroes in the right half-plane (RHP) make system insignificant as delay raises. To enhance the system performance, the factors of the conventional PIDC are optimized by a heuristic algorithm (HA), chosen harmony search (HS). HA, copying the invention of music players, chosen harmony search algorithm (HSA). The HSA looks to acquire a global optimal magnitude of the conventional PIDC and genetic algorithm (GA) in the area portrayed by the regular PID controller and GA. The simulation results demonstrate the transient responses such as settling, rise, peak time, undershoot, and overshoot. Thus to optimized the parameters by minimizing integral square error (ISE) of the given system is improved by the proposed method.

Keywords

Non-minimum phase (NMP) system Conventional PID controller Harmony search algorithm (HSA) Harmony memory considering rate (HMCR) Pitch adjusting rate (PAR) 

References

  1. 1.
    Hagglund, T.: An industrial dead-time compensating PI controller. Control Eng. Pract. 4(6), 749–756 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verma, S.K., Yadav, S., Nagar, S.K.: Optimized fractional order PID controller for non-minimum phase system with time delay. In: International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Electronics and Sustainable Energy Systems (ICETEESES), pp. 169–173, IEEE, Sultanpur (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yadav, S., Verma, S.K., Nagar, S.K.: Design of an optimized PID controller for non-minimum phase system with delay. In: 2015 39th National Systems Conference (NSC), IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palmor, Z.J.: Time-delay compensation Smith predictor and its modifications. In: Levine, W. (ed.) The Control Handbook, pp. 37–48. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watanabeand, K., Ito, M.: A process-model control for linear systems with delay. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 26(6), 1261–1269 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogata, K.: Modern Control Engineering, 4th edn, Prentice Hall, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gu, K., Niculescu, S.I.: Survey on recent results in the stability and control of time-delay systems. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 125(2), 158–165 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richard, J.P.: Time-delay systems: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica 39(10), 1667–1694 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    García, P., Albertos, P.: A new dead-time compensator to control stable and integrating processes with long dead-time. Automatica 44(4), 1062–1071 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Åströmand, K.J., Hägglund, T.: PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning, vol. 2, Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrument Society of America (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chidambaram, M., Sree, R.P.: A simple method of tuning PID controllers for integrator/dead-time processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27(2), 211–215( 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deb, K.: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, vol. 16, John Wiley & Sons (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geem, Z.W., Kim, J.H., Loganathan, G.V.: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new structural optimization method based on the harmony search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 82(9–10), 781–798 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, K.S., Geem, Z.W.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194(36–38), 3902–3933 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahdavi, M., Fesanghary, M., Damangir, E.: An improved harmony search algorithm for solving optimization problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 188(2), 1567–1579 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geem, Z.W. (ed.): Music-Inspired Harmony Search Algorithm: Theory and Applications, vol. 191, Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, X.S.: Harmony search as a metaheuristic algorithm. Music-Inspired Harmony Search Algorithm, pp. 1–14, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang, X.S.: A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010), pp. 65–74, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivek Kumar Jaiswal
    • 1
  • Anurag Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shekhar Yadav
    • 1
  • Shyam Krishna Nagar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringMMMUTGorakhpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringIIT (BHU)VaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations