Advertisement

Selection of Software Development Model Using TOPSIS Methodology

  • Dayanand Gaur
  • Sakshi Aggarwal
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 847)

Abstract

In software industry, the software project failure is a serious concern for stakeholders. The company suffers a huge financial loss in a year due to the team’s negligence and irresponsibility. It can happen because of mismanagement in decision making at any stage of project development. But the study conducted so far cites several causes such as unarticulated project goals, mishandling of requirements, poor estimation of resources, sloppy software development life-cycle model. The paper tries to reduce the effort of decision-makers and project team by outlining the significance of TOPSIS model. The statistical and quantitative analysis is the main feature of TOPSIS. It accomplishes the experts’ job by validating their opinions. It prioritizes the defined options after evaluating them against confliction and multiple attributes. The research proposes a decision-making framework for the selection of software development model using one of the widely accepted multicriteria decision-making tools, i.e., TOPSIS.

Keywords

Software engineering MCDM Decision-making methods TOPSIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Pressman, R.S.: Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7th edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology: Computer Society of IEEE, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Verner, J., Sampson, J., Cerpa, N.: What factors lead to software project failure? In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, Morocco, pp. 85–93 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hernández-Ledesma, G., Ramos, E.G., Fernández-y-Fernández, C.A., Aguilar-Cisneros, J.R., Rosas-Sumano, J.J., Morales-Ignacio, L.A.: Selection of best software engineering practices: a multi-criteria decision making approach. Res. Comput. Sci. 47–60 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Velasquez, M., Hester, P.T.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10, 56–66 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., Venkatesan, V.P.: A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. Am. J. Inform. Syst. 1, 31–43 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Sanchez, S.N., Ray, T.: Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encycl. Electr. Electron. Eng. 15, 175–186 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ermatita, Hartati, S., Wardoyo, R., Harjoko, A.: Electre methods in solving group decision support system bioinformatics on gene mutation detection simulation. IJCSIT 3, 40–52 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anitha, M., Sathiya, M.: Improved technique by integrating AHP-TOPSIS for prioritization. IJETST 2, 1911–1915 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, D.-Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649–655 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ayhan, M.B.: A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: a case study in a gear motor company. IJMVSC 4, 11–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jollyta, D.: TOPSIS technique for selecting of property development location. Softw. Eng. 6, 20–26 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sehra, S.K., Brar, Y.S., Kaur, N.: Applying fuzzy-AHP for software effort estimation in data scarcity. IJETT 45, 4–9 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., Agouti, T.: Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. In: SpringerPlus, pp. 1–17 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dipti, S.: Maintainability estimation of component based software development using fuzzy AHP. IJETST 1, 280–285 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ersayin, K., Tagil, S.: Ecological sensitivity and risk assessment in the Kizilirmak Delta. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 26, 6508–6516 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer ScienceGalgotias UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.Software EngineeringGalgotias UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations