Advertisement

Salt Diffusion Through Sodium Bentonite and Bentonite Polymer Composite

  • Shan Tong
  • Kristin M. Sample-Lord
  • Gretchen L. Bohnhoff
  • Andrew B. Balken
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Sodium bentonite (NaB) commonly is used in engineered barriers due to the advantageous properties of the bentonite for waste containment, such as high swell, low hydraulic conductivity, and low diffusion coefficients. However, the sensitivity of NaB to chemical incompatibility has motivated development of enhanced bentonites, such as bentonite polymer composites (BPC), for improved chemical resistance and superior barrier performance. Although recent studies have indicated that BPC may maintain lower values of hydraulic conductivity (k) than NaB when exposed to solutions with high ionic strength and/or concentrations of multivalent species, data to compare diffusion performance remains limited, even though diffusion is a significant contaminant transport mechanism in clays for the reported values of \( k( < 10^{ - 9} {\text{m}}/{\text{s}}) \). Therefore, the goal of this study was to measure diffusion through BPC and NaB specimens using a series of dialysis-leaching tests and potassium chloride (KCl) solutions ranging in concentration from 0 to 200 mM. Apparent diffusion coefficients, Da, for chloride (Cl) for the BPC increased from 1.1 × 10−12 m2/s to 1.1 × 10−9 m2/s as the average concentration of Cl in the specimen (Cave) increased from 25 to 211 mM, These results were consistent with trends reported in a previous study based on the through-diffusion test method. The Da values for NaB increased from 3.3 × 10−12 m2/s to 1.4 × 10−9 m2/s as the Cave for Cl increased from 5.6 to 177 mM, which was consistent with expectations based on diffuse double-layer theory. Similar values of Da were measured for chloride for both NaB and BPC, indicating equivalent diffusive performance of the two materials for strong monovalent solutions.

Keywords

Diffusion Geosynthetic clay liners Enhanced bentonite 

References

  1. Bohnhoff G, Shackelford C (2013) Improving membrane performance via bentonite polymer nanocomposite. Appl Clay Sci 86:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohnhoff G, Shackelford C, Sample-Lord K (2014) Calcium resistant membrane behavior of a polymerized bentonite. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 140(3):04013029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohnhoff G, Shackelford C (2015) Salt diffusion through a polymerized bentonite membrane. Clay Clay Miner 63(3):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (2013) Method 1315: mass transfer rates of constituents in monolithic or compacted granular materials using a semi-dynamic tank leaching test, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Malusis M, Shackelford C, Olsen H (2001) A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils. Geotech Test J 24(3):229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Malusis M, Shackelford C (2002a) Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 128(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Malusis M, Shackelford C (2002b) Coupling effects during steady-state solute diffusion through a semipermeable clay membrane. Environ Sci Technol 36(6):1312–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Muzny C, Butler B, Hanley H, Tsvetkov F, Peiffer D (1996) Clay platelet dispersion in a polymer matrix. Materials Letters 28(4–6):379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sample-Lord K, Shackelford C (2016) Solute diffusion in bentonite pastes. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 142(8):04016033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sample-Lord K, Bohnhoff G, Tong S (2017) Diffusion of calcium chloride through polymerized bentonite. In: Geotechnical Frontiers 2017. ASCE, GSP 276, Orlando, pp 200–208Google Scholar
  11. Scalia J, Benson C (2017) Polymer fouling and hydraulic conductivity of mixtures of sodium bentonite and a bentonite-polymer composite. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 143(4):04016112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Scalia J, Benson C, Bohnhoff G, Edil T, Shackelford C (2011) Geosynthetic clay liners containing bentonite polymer nanocomposite. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011 advances in geotechnical engineering. ASCE, Dallas, pp 2001–2009Google Scholar
  13. Scalia J, Benson C, Bohnhoff G, Edil T, Shackelford C (2014) Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a bentonite-polymer composite permeated with aggressive inorganic solutions. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 140(3):04013025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scalia J, Bohnhoff G, Shackelford C, Benson C, Sample-Lord K, Malusis M, Likos W (2018) Enhanced bentonites for containment of inorganic waste leachates by GCLs. Geosynth Int, 1–56.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.18.00024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shackelford C (1991) Laboratory diffusion testing for waste disposal - a review. J Contam Hydrol 7(3):177–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tian K, Benson C, Likos W (2017) Effect of anion ratio on the hydraulic conductivity of a 462 bentonite- polymer geosynthetic clay liner. In: Geo-Frontiers 2017. ASCE, Orlando, pp 180–189Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shan Tong
    • 1
  • Kristin M. Sample-Lord
    • 1
  • Gretchen L. Bohnhoff
    • 2
  • Andrew B. Balken
    • 2
  1. 1.Villanova UniversityVillanovaUSA
  2. 2.University of Wisconsin-PlattevillePlattevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations