Advertisement

Semi-analytical Model for Methane Transport and Oxidation Through Landfill Compacted Clay Liner (CCL) Cover

  • Qiao Wang
  • Jiawei Wu
  • Haijian Xie
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Semi-analytical model for methane transport and oxidation through CCL cover was developed. Influence of gas diffusion coefficient and methane oxidation rate on the transport of methane and oxygen through CCL cover was investigated. Methane diffusion coefficient has great influence on methane transport through CCL cover but has no obvious influence on oxygen concentration profile. When t = 0.1 day, methane concentration for the case with Dm = 3.81 × 10−6 m2/s is 8 times greater than the case with Dm = 3.81 × 10−7 m2/s at depth z = 0.1 m. Oxygen concentration at the same depth increases with the increase of oxygen diffusion coefficient. Methane oxidation rate has great influence on methane transport through CCL cover but has on effect on oxygen transport through CCL cover. When t = 1 day, concentration of methane at z = 0.1 m for the case with k = 9.12 × 10−5 s−1 is approximately 40 times greater than the case with k = 9.12 × 10−4 s−1. It is also indicated that time needed to reach steady-state increases with the decrease of methane oxidation rate.

Keywords

Landfill Methane oxidation Semi-analytical model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China 501 (Grants Nos. 41672288, 51478427, 51625805, 51278452, and 51008274), the 502 Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2017QNA4028), 503 and Zhejiang Provincial Key Research Project (Grant No. 2015C03021) are gratefully 504 acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Scheehle E, Godwin D, Ottinger, D, DeAngelo B (2006) Global anthropogenic non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions: 1990-2020. Version: revised JuneGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reinhart DR, Townsend TG (1997) Landfill Bioreactor Design and Operation. Lewis Publication, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bian R, Xin D, Chai X (2018) A simulation model for estimating methane oxidation and emission from landfill cover soils. Waste Management, In PressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Visscher AD, Cleemput OV (2003) Simulation model for gas diffusion and methane oxidation in landfill cover soils. Waste Manag 23(7):581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feng S, Cww N, Leung AK, Liu HW (2017) Numerical modelling of methane oxidation efficiency and coupled water-gas-heat reactive transfer in a sloping landfill cover. Waste Manag 68:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ng CW, Feng S, Liu HW (2015) A fully coupled model for water-gas-heat reactive transport with methane oxidation in landfill covers. Sci Total Environ 508:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yao Y, Su Y, Wu Y, Liu W, He R (2015) An analytical model for estimating the reduction of methane emission through landfill cover soils by methane oxidation. J Hazard Mater 283(283):871–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Millington RJ, Quirk JP (1961) Permeability of porous solids. Trans Faraday Soc 5(8):1200–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Townsend TG, Wise WR, Jain P (2005) One-dimensional gas flow model for horizontal gas collection systems at municipal solid waste landfills. J Environ Eng 131(12):1716–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stehfest H (1970) Algorithm 368: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun ACM 13(1):47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    COMSOL (2014) COMSOL Multiphysics. 5th ed. http://cn.comsol.com/release/5.0

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations