Advertisement

Photocatalysis pp 241-258 | Cite as

Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Technology

  • Jinlong Zhang
  • Baozhu Tian
  • Lingzhi Wang
  • Mingyang Xing
  • Juying Lei
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Chemistry book series (LNC, volume 100)

Abstract

Organic pollutants, especially dye pollution, cause great concern owing to their being toxic, carcinogenic, and harmful to the nature and human beings. The wastewater treatment technology, equipment, and catalysts have been the focus of environmental scientific researchers beyond dispute. Iron (hydr)oxides have high photocatalytic activity and excellent magnetic separation for recycling. And graphene that has high surface area and other unique properties can be utilized to fabricate composite materials with iron (hydr)oxides, which makes the iron-based materials become multifunctional catalysts in Fenton reaction. Recent studies have indicated that the graphene/iron (hydr)oxide composites exhibit excellent catalysis to organic molecules with H2O2 by (1) catalytic degrading organic compounds and (2) decomposing H2O2 to generate hydroxyl radicals. This chapter summarizes the recent research progress in the development of iron (hydr)oxides/graphene composites for the application in water purification. The degradation of various types of dye pollutants on different types of graphene/iron (hydr)oxides catalysts were also introduced in this chapter. Finally, the current challenges and the crucial issues in the iron (hydr)oxides-based catalysts that need to be further investigated are also provided for future study of researchers interested in environment protection and purification.

Keywords

Graphene Fenton Iron (hydr)oxides Catalysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Speth DR, In’t Zandt MH, Guerrero-Cruz S et al (2016) Genome-based microbial ecology of anammox granules in a full-scale wastewater treatment system. Nat Commun 7:11172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gago-Ferrero P, Schymanski EL, Bletsou AA et al (2015) Extended suspect and non-target strategies to characterize emerging polar organic contaminants in raw wastewater with LC-HRMS/MS. Environ Sci Technol 49(20):12333–12341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ojha DP, Joshi MK, Kim HJ (2017) Photo-Fenton degradation of organic pollutants using a zinc oxide decorated iron oxide/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Ceram Int 43(1):1290–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W et al (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95(1):69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Legrini O, Oliveros E, Braun AM (1993) Photochemical processes for water treatment. Chem Rev 93(2):671–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu K, Xie Y, Zhao J et al (1999) Photo-Fenton degradation of a dye under visible light irradiation. J Mol Catal A-Chem 144(1):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neyens E, Baeyens J (2003) A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J Hazard Mater 98(1):33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tian S, Tu Y, Chen D et al (2011) Degradation of Acid Orange II at neutral pH using Fe2(MoO4)3 as a heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst. Chem Eng J 169(1):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feng J, Hu X, Yue P (2004) Discoloration and mineralization of Orange II using different heterogeneous catalysts containing Fe: a comparative study. Environ Sci Technol 38(21):5773–5778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arnold SM, Hickey WJ, Harris RF (1995) Degradation of atrazine by Fenton's reagent: condition optimization and product quantification. Environ Sci Technol 29(8):2083–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herney-Ramirez J, Vicente MA, Madeira LM (2010) Heterogeneous photo-Fenton oxidation with pillared clay-based catalysts for wastewater treatment: a review. Appl Catal B-Environ 98(1):10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pouran SR, Aziz ARA, Daud WMAW (2015) Review on the main advances in photo-Fenton oxidation system for recalcitrant wastewaters. J Ind Eng Chem 21:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Babuponnusami A, Muthukumar K (2014) A review on Fenton and improvements to the Fenton process for wastewater treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 2(1):557–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Navalon S, Alvaro M et al (2012) Metal nanoparticles as heterogeneous Fenton catalysts. ChemSusChem 5(1):46–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li D, Yuranova T, Albers P et al (2004) Accelerated photobleaching of Orange II on novel (H5FeW12O40•10H2O)/silica structured fabrics. Water Res 38(16):3541–3550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sabhi S, Kiwi J (2001) Degradation of 2, 4-dichlorophenol by immobilized iron catalysts. Water Res 35(8):1994–2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu X, Liu B, Deng Y et al (2011) Adsorption and heterogeneous Fenton degradation of 17α-methyltestosterone on nano Fe3O4/MWCNTs in aqueous solution. Appl Catal B-Environ 107(3):274–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timofeeva MN, Hasan Z, Orlov AY et al (2011) Fe-containing nickel phosphate molecular sieves as heterogeneous catalysts for phenol oxidation and hydroxylation with H2O2. Appl Catal B-Environ 107(1):197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song Z, Wang N, Zhu L et al (2012) Efficient oxidative degradation of triclosan by using an enhanced Fenton-like process. Chem Eng J 198:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nika DL, Pokatilov EP, Askerov AS et al (2009) Phonon thermal conduction in graphene: role of Umklapp and edge roughness scattering. Phys Rev B 79(15):155413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mayorov AS, Gorbachev RV, Morozov SV et al (2011) Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett 11(6):2396–2399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li X, Zhu Y, Cai W et al (2009) Transfer of large-area graphene films for high-performance transparent conductive electrodes. Nano Lett 9(12):4359–4363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang H, Cui LF, Yang Y et al (2010) Mn3O4-graphene hybrid as a high-capacity anode material for lithium ion batteries. J Am Chem Soc 132(40):13978–13980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoo EJ, Kim J, Hosono E et al (2008) Large reversible Li storage of graphene nanosheet families for use in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett 8(8):2277–2282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liang M, Zhi L (2009) Graphene-based electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Mater Chem 19(33):5871–5878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang X, Zhi L, Müllen K (2008) Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 8(1):323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin Z, Wu S, Zhou X et al (2010) Electrochemical deposition of ZnO nanorods on transparent reduced graphene oxide electrodes for hybrid solar cells. Small 6(2):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu J, Becerril HA, Bao Z et al (2008) Organic solar cells with solution-processed graphene transparent electrodes. Appl Phys Lett 92(26):237Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schedin F, Geim AK, Morozov SV et al (2007) Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nat Mater 6(9):652–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shao Y, Wang J, Wu H et al (2010) Graphene based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis 22(10):1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shan C, Yang H, Song J et al (2009) Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and biosensing for glucose based on graphene. Anal Chem 81(6):2378–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    An J, Zhu L, Wang N et al (2013) Photo-Fenton like degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A with graphene BiFeO3 composite as a catalyst. Chem Eng J 219:225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou Q, Xing A, Li J et al (2016) Synergistic enhancement in photoelectrocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A by CeO2 and reduced graphene oxide co-modified TiO2 nanotube arrays in combination with Fenton oxidation. Electrochim Acta 209:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qiu B, Deng Y, Du M et al (2016) Ultradispersed cobalt ferrite nanoparticles assembled in graphene aerogel for continuous photo-Fenton reaction and enhanced lithium storage performance. Sci Rep-UK 6:29099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Babu SG, Vinoth R, Neppolian B et al (2015) Diffused sunlight driven highly synergistic pathway for complete mineralization of organic contaminants using reduced graphene oxide supported photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 291:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wan Z, Hu J, Wang J (2016) Removal of sulfamethazine antibiotics using Ce Fe-graphene nanocomposite as catalyst by Fenton-like process. J Environ Manag 182:284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Y, Yu Y, Deng C et al (2015) Synthesis of mesoporous MCM-41 supported reduced graphene oxide-Fe catalyst for heterogeneous Fenton degradation of phenol. RSC Adv 5(126):103989–103998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yun S, Lee YC, Park HS (2016) Phase-controlled iron oxide nanobox deposited on hierarchically structured graphene networks for lithium ion storage and photocatalysis. Sci Rep 6:19959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhou Y, Xiao B, Liu SQ et al (2016) Photo-Fenton degradation of ammonia via a manganese–iron double-active component catalyst of graphene–manganese ferrite under visible light. Chem Eng J 283:266–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    He H, He Z, Shen Q (2017) Photocatalysis of novel reduced graphene oxide-CoSe nanocomposites with efficient interface-induced effect. Compo Interf 24(1):85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW et al (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887):385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zheng Y, Wei N, Fan Z et al (2011) Mechanical properties of grafold: a demonstration of strengthened graphene. Nanotechnology 22(40):405701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Geim AK, MacDonald AH (2007) Graphene: exploring carbon flatland. Phys Today 60(8):35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu Q, Guo Y, Chen Z et al (2016) Constructing a novel ternary Fe (III)/graphene/gC3N4 composite photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light driven photocatalytic activity via interfacial charge transfer effect. Appl Catal B-Environ 183:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zubir NA, Motuzas J, Yacou C et al (2016) Graphene oxide with zinc partially substituted magnetite (GO–Fe1−xZnxOy) for the UV-assisted heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. RSC Adv 6(50):44749–44757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee YC, Chang SJ, Choi MH et al (2013) Self-assembled graphene oxide with organo-building blocks of Fe-aminoclay for heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction at near-neutral pH: a batch experiment. Appl Catal B-Environ 142:494–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xiao F, Li W, Fang L et al (2016) Synthesis of akageneite (beta-FeOOH)/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for oxidative decomposition of 2-chlorophenol by Fenton-like reaction. J Hazard Mater 308:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mishra M, Chun DM (2015) α-Fe2O3 as a photocatalytic material: a review. Appl Catal A-Gen 498:126–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Liu B, Tian L, Wang R et al (2017) Pyrrolic-N-doped graphene oxide/Fe2O3 mesocrystal nanocomposite: efficient charge transfer and enhanced photo-Fenton catalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 2017 412:207–213Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Guo S, Zhang G, Guo Y et al (2013) Graphene oxide-Fe2O3 hybrid material as highly efficient heterogeneous catalyst for degradation of organic contaminants. Carbon 60:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Han S, Hu L, Liang Z et al (2014) One-step hydrothermal synthesis of 2D hexagonal nanoplates of α-Fe2O3/graphene composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Adv Funct Mater 24(36):5719–5727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu Y, Jin W, Zhao Y et al (2017) Enhanced catalytic degradation of methylene blue by α-Fe2O3/graphene oxide via heterogeneous photo-Fenton reactions. Appl Catal B-Environ 206:642–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Qiu B, Xing M, Zhang J (2015) Stöber-like method to synthesize ultralight, porous, stretchable Fe2O3/graphene aerogels for excellent performance in photo-Fenton reaction and electrochemical capacitors. J Mater Chem A 3(24):12820–12827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Santhosh C, Kollu P, Doshi S et al (2014) Adsorption, photodegradation and antibacterial study of graphene-Fe3O4 nanocomposite for multipurpose water purification application. RSC Adv 4(54):28300–28308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shen J, Li Y, Zhu Y et al (2016) Aerosol synthesis of Graphene-Fe3O4 hollow hybrid microspheres for heterogeneous Fenton and electro-Fenton reaction. J Environ Chem Eng 4(2):2469–2476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hua Y, Wang S, Xiao J et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of Fe3O4/gallic acid/graphene oxide magnetic nanocomposites as highly efficient Fenton catalysts. RSC Adv 7(46):28979–28986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zubir NA, Yacou C, Zhang X et al (2014) Optimisation of graphene oxide–iron oxide nanocomposite in heterogeneous Fenton-like oxidation of Acid Orange 7. J Environ Chem Eng 2(3):1881–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chang YH, Yao YF, Luo H et al (2014) Magnetic Fe3O4-GO nanocomposites as highly efficient Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of dyes. Int J Nanomanuf 10(1–2):132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Liu W, Qian J, Wang K et al (2013) Magnetically separable Fe3O4 nanoparticles-decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for catalytic wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation. J Inorg Organomet P 23(4):907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhou Z, Su M, Shih K (2017) Highly efficient and recyclable graphene oxide-magnetite composites for isatin mineralization. J Alloy Compd 725:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Qiu B, Li Q, Shen B et al (2016) Stöber-like method to synthesize ultradispersed Fe3O4 nanoparticles on graphene with excellent Photo-Fenton reaction and high-performance lithium storage. Appl Catal B-Environ 183:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jiang X, Li L, Cui Y et al (2017) New branch on old tree: green-synthesized RGO/Fe3O4 composite as a photo-Fenton catalyst for rapid decomposition of methylene blue. Ceram Int 43(16):14361–14368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yu L, Chen J, Liang Z et al (2016) Degradation of phenol using Fe3O4-GO nanocomposite as a heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst. Sep Purif Technol 171:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Boruah PK, Sharma B, Karbhal I et al (2017) Ammonia-modified graphene sheets decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the photocatalytic and photo-Fenton degradation of phenolic compounds under sunlight irradiation. J Hazard Mater 325:90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wang P, Wang L, Sun Q et al (2016) Preparation and performance of Fe3O4@hydrophilic graphene composites with excellent Photo-Fenton activity for photocatalysis. Mater Lett 183:61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yang B, Tian Z, Zhang L et al (2015) Enhanced heterogeneous Fenton degradation of Methylene Blue by nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) assembled on magnetic Fe3O4/reduced graphene oxide. J Water Process Eng 5:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zubir NA, Yacou C, Motuzas J et al (2014) Structural and functional investigation of graphene oxide-Fe3O4 nanocomposites for the heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction. Sci Rep 4:4594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    He H, Huang J, Lu J (2016) Photo-and Photo-Fenton-like catalytic degradations of Malachite Green in a water using magnetically separable ZnFe2O4-reduced graphene oxide hybrid nanostructures. J Sci Res Rep 10(2):1–11Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yao Y, Cai Y, Lu F et al (2014) Magnetic recoverable MnFe2O4 and MnFe2O4-graphene hybrid as heterogeneous catalysts of peroxymonosulfate activation for efficient degradation of aqueous organic pollutants. J Hazard Mater 270:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yao Y, Yang Z, Zhang D et al (2012) Magnetic CoFe2O4-graphene hybrids: facile synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(17):6044–6051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yang D, Feng J, Jiang L et al (2015) Photocatalyst interface engineering: spatially confined growth of ZnFe2O4 within graphene networks as excellent visible-light-driven photocatalysts. Adv Funct Mater 25(45):7080–7087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fu Y, Wang X (2011) Magnetically separable ZnFe2O4-graphene catalyst and its high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(12):7210–7218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lu D, Zhang Y, Lin S et al (2013) Synthesis of magnetic ZnFe2O4/graphene composite and its application in photocatalytic degradation of dyes. J Alloy Compd 579:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Wang Y, Fang J, Crittenden JC et al (2017) Novel RGO/α-FeOOH supported catalyst for Fenton oxidation of phenol at a wide pH range using solar-light-driven irradiation. J Hazard Mater 329:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Liu Y, Liu X, Zhao Y et al (2017) Aligned α-FeOOH nanorods anchored on a graphene oxide-carbon nanotubes aerogel can serve as an effective Fenton-like oxidation catalyst. Appl Catal B-Environ 213:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinlong Zhang
    • 1
  • Baozhu Tian
    • 1
  • Lingzhi Wang
    • 1
  • Mingyang Xing
    • 1
  • Juying Lei
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials & Institute of Fine ChemicalsEast China University of Science & TechnologyShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations