Advertisement

Aortoscopy to Evaluate Cusp Configuration After Aortic Valvuloplasty

  • Takashi KuniharaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Aortic valve repair is an attractive option for patients with aortic insufficiency, especially in the young. However, it has not yet become widely accepted (see Chap.  9 by Arimura) [1]. Why has aortic valve repair been performed so infrequently in contrast with mitral valve repair? There are some anatomical and technical reasons; however, the lack of direct intraoperative evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) after repair may be the greatest reason. Generally, the cusp configuration should be assessed using two or three traction sutures fixed at each commissure with the same tension and in a symmetric direction. This cannot always be realized, however, in the clinical setting. Furthermore, this evaluation technique does not imitate diastolic pressure. Therefore, unexpected AR can occasionally be observed after aortic unclamping even if the repair seems appropriate visually. This could be avoided if we could assess the cusp configuration exactly under the condition of physiological pressure.

References

  1. 1.
    Arimura S, Seki M, Sasaki K, Takai H, Matsuhama M, Kunihara T, et al. A nationwide survey of aortic valve surgery in Japan: current status of valve preservation in cases with aortic regurgitation. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:429–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Itoh T, Ohtsubo S, Furukawa K, Norita H. Aortic root endoscopy in valve-sparing operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:141–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ohtsubo S, Itoh T, Natsuaki M, Furukawa K, Yoshikai M, Suda H, et al. Successful valve-sparing in aortic root reconstruction under endoscopic guidance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:420–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meunier JP, Berkane N, Lopez S, El Ghobary T, Teboul J, Malzac B, et al. Traumatic aortic regurgitation: aortic valvuloplasty controlled by aortoscopy. J Heart Valve Dis. 2001;10:784–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iida H, Sudo Y, Sunazawa T, Ukita H. Endoscopic observation following aortic cusp plication. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:425–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsagakis K, Benedik J, El Khoury G, Jakob H. Aortic valve repair: intraoperative evaluation of valve geometry by angioscopy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1666–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sievers HH. Better seeing is more believing: angioscopy in aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1668–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okita Y, Oka T, Miyahara S, Okada K. Direct visualization of the aortic cusp from the left ventricle during aortic root reimplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:981–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiac SurgeryThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations