Advertisement

United States Risk Management in the Post-war Iraq: Encountering Societal Risks

  • Radomir Compel
Chapter

Abstract

Building on the insights from the sociological approaches of Ulrich Beck on risk society, and of Copenhagen school on societal security, this chapter elaborates about human-made risks and changing nature of security, incorporating culture and identity issues. The chapter draws on the case study of the Iraq War and post-war recovery efforts, paying attention to their emphasis on risk management exposed in recent military strategies. The three mechanisms that the United States-led Coalition Provisional Authority relied upon in risk management were early elections, stable government, and development of civil society. The chapter examines the societal risks associated with the three mechanisms of risk control. It argues that the new turn in security studies toward identity could be detected in Iraq, and that we live in a society which is increasingly suffering from human-manufactured risks.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was partially funded by JSPS research grant no. 26780087.

References

  1. Allawi, Ali A. 2007. The occupation of Iraq: Winning the war, losing the peace. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allawi, Ali Abdul Ameer. 2006. Civil society in Iraq at work amid the war (Heritage lectures 946). Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Aradau, Claudia. 2004. Security and the democratic scene: Desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster. 2011. Politics of catastrophe: Genealogies of the unknown. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Balzacq, Thierry. 2015. The rise of precaution and the global governance of risks. Political Studies Review 13 (4): 546–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbour, Josephine, Melissa Brill, and Jeffrey Swedberg. 2012. Iraq civil society assessment: Final report. Washington, DC: The QED Group, Inc..Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society. Translated by Mark Ritter. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1997. The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1999 [2014]. World risk society, Japanese version (Sekai Risku Shakai). Translated by Yamamoto Hiraku. Tokyo: Hosei Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2002 [2010]. Weltrisikogesellschaft, Japanese version (Sekai Risku Shakairon). Translated by Shimamura Kenichi. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2006. Power in the global age: A new global political economy. Polity.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2009. World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Booth, Ken. 2008a. Theory of world security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2008b. The human faces of terror. Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brandstetter, Robert H., and Victoria Fontan. 2005. Final report for political process assistance review: Monitoring and Evaluation Performance Program, Phase II (MEPP II). International Business & Technical Consultants, Washington, DC, U.S. Agency for International Development. Accessed November 10, 2017. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACH531.pdf.
  16. Bremer, L. Paul, and Malcolm McConnell. 2006. My year in Iraq: The struggle to build a future of hope. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Bush, George W. 2003. Remarks to the people of Poland in Krakow, Poland. May 31. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=64354.
  18. ———. 2005. Remarks on the 60th anniversary of V-J day in San Diego, California. The American Presidency Project, August 30. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=64853.
  19. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap De Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Carothers, Thomas. 2003. Is gradualism possible? Choosing a strategy for promoting democracy in the middle east (Working Paper 39). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, Andrew. 2002. War letters: Extraordinary correspondence from American wars. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  22. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2002. The postwar occupations of Germany and Japan: Implications for Iraq. National Security Archive, August 7. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB328/II-Doc17.pdf.
  23. Chandrasekaran, Rajiv. 2006. Imperial life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s green zone. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  24. Chirarelli, Major General Peter W., and Major Patrick R. Michaelis. 2005. Winning the peace: The requirement for full-spectrum operations. Military Review 85 (4/July–Aug.): 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Crane, Conrad C., and W. Andrew Terrill. 2003. Reconstructing Iraq: Insights, challenges, and missions for military forces in a post-conflict scenario. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, Eric. 2005. Strategies for promotion of democracy in Iraq (Special report 153). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  27. Dawisha, Aideed. 2009. Iraq: A political history from independence to occupation. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Diamond, Larry Jay. 2005. Squandered victory: The American occupation and the bungled effort to bring democracy to Iraq. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  29. Dingwall, Robert. 1999. “Risk society”: The cult of theory and the millennium? Social Policy & Administration 33 (4): 474–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dobbins, James. 2003. America’s role in nation-building: From Germany to Iraq. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2008. After the war: Nation-building from FDR to George W. Bush. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2009. Occupying Iraq: A history of the coalition provisional authority. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  33. Edmunds, Timothy. 2012. British civil–military relations and the problem of risk. International Affairs 88 (2): 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eisenstadt, Michael, and Eric Mathewson, eds. 2003. U.S. policy in post-saddam Iraq: Lessons from the British experience. Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
  35. Elkins, Zachary, Tom Ginsburg, and James Melton. 2009. The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Feith, Douglas J. 2008. War and decision: Inside the pentagon at the dawn of the war on terrorism. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  37. Feldman, Noah. 2003. After Jihad: America and the struggle for Islamic democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2004. What we owe Iraq: War and the ethics of nation building. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2008. The fall and rise of the Islamic state. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Fontan, Victoria. 2006. Polarization between occupier and occupied in post-saddam Iraq: Humiliation and the formation of political violence. Terrorism and Political Violence 18 (2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2007. Understanding Islamic terrorism: Humiliation awareness and the role for nonviolence. In Nonviolence: An alternative for defeating global terror(ism), ed. R. Summy and R. Senthil. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2009. Voices from post-saddam Iraq -living with terrorism, insurgency, and new forms of Tyranny. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. Gompert, David C., Hans Binnendijk, and Bonny Lin. 2014. Blinders, blunders, and wars: What America and China can learn. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR768.html.Google Scholar
  44. Gordon, Michael R., and Bernard E. Trainor. 2006. Cobra II: The inside story of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  45. Hama, Hawre Hasan. 2017. State security, societal security, and human security. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations 21 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Herd, Graeme P., and Joan Logfren. 2001. ‘Societal security’, the Baltic states and EU integration. Cooperation and Conflict 36 (3): 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Huysmans, Jef. 1998. Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the creative development of a security studies agenda in Europe. European Journal of International Relations 4 (4): 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kilcullen, David. 2009. The accidental Guerrilla: Fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2016. Blood year: The unraveling of western counterterrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Krahmann, Elke. 2011. Beck and beyond: Selling security in the world risk society. Review of International Studies 37 (1): 349–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levine, Daniel H., and Linda S. Bishai. 2010. Civic education and peacebuilding (Special report 254). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  52. Mann, Sloan, Ylber Bajraktari, and Patricia Karam. 2004. Donor activities and civil society potential in Iraq (Special report 124). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  53. Marr, Phebe. 2012. The modern history of Iraq. 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  54. McSweeney, Bill. 1999. Security, identity, and interests: A sociology of international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mythen, Gabe. 2004. Ulrich Beck: A critical introduction to the risk society. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2016. Terrorism and war: Interrogating discourses of risk and security. In The Palgrave handbook of criminology and war, ed. Ross McGarry and Sandra Walklate. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  57. Ottaway, Marina. 2004. Women’s rights and democracy in the Arab World. (Working paper 42). Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  58. Packer, George. 2005. Assassins gate: America in Iraq. London: Farrar Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  59. Phillips, Davis L. 2005. Loosing Iraq: Inside the postwar reconstruction fiasco. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
  60. Poitras, Laura. 2006. My country, My country. Documentary Film.Google Scholar
  61. Rasborg, Klaus. 2012. (World) risk society or ‘new rationalities of risk’? A critical discussion of Ulrich Beck’s theory of reflexive modernity. Thesis Eleven 108 (2): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ricks, Thomas E. 2006. Fiasco: The American military adventure in Iraq. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  63. Roe, Paul. 2005. Ethnic violence and the societal security dilemma. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Ross, Dennis, Robert Satloff, Patric Clawson, David Makovsky, and Matthew Levitt. 2003. Winning the peace in the middle east: A bipartisan blueprint for postwar U.S. policy. Washington, DC: The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
  65. Samier, Eugenie A. 2015. The globalization of higher education as a societal and cultural security problem. Policy Futures in Education 0 (0): 1–20.Google Scholar
  66. Schmid, Alex, ed. 2011. The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Schmid, Alex, and Albert Jongman. 1988. Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories and literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Serafino, Nina, Curt Tarnoff, and Dick K. Nanto. 2006. U.S. occupation assistance Iraq, Germany and Japan compared. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  69. Theiler, Tobias. 2003. Societal security and social psychology. Review of International Studies 29: 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tripp, Charles. 2007. A history of Iraq. 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trump, Donald J. 2018. Address before a joint session of the congress on the state of the union. January 30. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=128921&st=migration&st1=threat.
  72. United States, Department of Defense (U.S. DoD). 2001. Quadrennial defense review report. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2008. National defense strategy. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  74. United States, White House. 2017. National security strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
  75. Waever, Ole, Barry Buzan, Morton Kelstrup, and Pierre Lemaitre. 1993. Identity, migration and the new security order in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  76. Webb, Kathleen, Stark Biddle, Robert Torene, and Harvey Herr. 2007a. Building on transition: Iraq Civil Society Program (ICSP) evaluation, final report. Vienna, VA: International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar
  77. ———. 2007b. Building on transition: Iraq Civil Society Program (ICSP) evaluation, final report—Consolidated annexes. Vienna, VA: International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radomir Compel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Global Humanities and Social SciencesNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations