Advertisement

Śūnya, Śūnyatā, and Reality in Modern Physics

  • Herbert J. BernsteinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Quantum mechanics (QM) is the physics of atoms and their constituents. Under reductionism, QM should provide the solid reality for our world, as Einstein insisted. Instead, quantum properties depend strongly on their observer; they are empty (śūnya) until co-dependently created. So physics provides a time-dependent, co-emergent reality (which I designate reality) reminiscent of śūnyatā.

Yet physicists justify QM because “It works,” begging for the questions: works for whom? to do what? Responding to these questions and similar ones in many fields, I helped start a small organization, the Institute for Science and Interdisciplinary Studies. Its philosophical program aims to help reconstruct knowledge for progressive purposes. The Institute’s analysis provided insight into quantum teleportation and helped me invent a variant that US-NASA currently develops for communication from space.

The author is also a Buddhist Dzogchen practitioner. This essay speculates on the relation of śūnya and śūnyatā to scientific knowledge. Does the union of emptiness, cognizance, and compassion within dharmakāya imply that Eastern concepts from Hinduism and Buddhism can provide a second source of inspiration for reconstructive knowledge?

Keywords

Śūnyatā Quantum reductionism Quantum properties Quantum teleportation Buddhist Dzogchen Dharmakāya 

References

  1. 1.
    Raskin MG, Bernstein HJ. Cf new ways of knowing. Totowa: Rowman& Littlefield; 1987. p. 61–4. I even imagined that some striking application of experimenter choice would make it clear that we are quite responsible for our lived realityGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein HJ. SuperDense quantum teleportation by remote state preparation. Quantum Inf Process. 2006;5(6). Doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-006-0030-5, Springer Verlag. www.springerlink.com/content/r0773t4138510q21/
  3. 3.
    Petersen A. The philosophy of Niels Bohr. Bull At Sci. 1963;19:13 [emphasis in the original].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein A, Rosen N. The particle problem in the general theory of relativity. Phys Rev. 1935;48:73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bell JS. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. p. 171.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bennett CH, Brassard G, Crepeau C, Jozsa R, Peres A, Wootters WK. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett. 1993;70(13):1895–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forman P. Behind quantum electronics: national security as basis for physical research in the United States, 1940–1960. Hist Stud Phys Sci. 1987;18(1):149–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reck M, Zeilinger A, Bernstein H, Bertani P. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;73:589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Good IJ. Remarks on the mind-body question. In: The scientist speculates. London: Heinemann; 1961.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Science/NS, Hampshire CollegeAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations