Advertisement

Subjective Evolution of Consciousness in Modern Science and Vedāntic Philosophy: Particulate Concept to Quantum Mechanics in Modern Science and Śūnyavāda to Acintya-Bhedābheda-Tattva in Vedānta

  • Bhakti Niskama ShantaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

How the universe came to be what it is now is a key philosophical question. The hypothesis that it came from nothing or śūnya (as proposed by Stephen Hawking, among others) proves to be dissembling, since the quantum vacuum can hardly be considered a void (śūnya). In modern science, it is generally assumed that matter existed before the universe came to be. Modern science hypothesizes that the manifestation of life on earth is nothing but a mere increment in the complexity of matter – and hence is an outcome of evolution of matter (chemical evolution) following the Big Bang. After the manifestation of life, modern science believed that chemical evolution transformed itself into biological evolution, which then had caused the entire biodiversity on our planet. In the framework of materialism, the major attention is to find general organizational laws stimulated by physical sciences, ignoring the uniqueness of life. The main goal of materialism is to reduce consciousness to natural processes, which in turn can be translated into the language of math, physics, and chemistry. Following this approach, scientists have made several attempts to deny the living organism of its veracity as an immortal soul, in favor of genes, molecules, atoms, and so on. However, advancement in various fields of biology has repeatedly given rise to questions against such a denial and has supplied more and more evidence against the completely misleading ideological imposition that living entities are particular states of matter. In the recent past, however, the realization has arisen that cognitive nature of life at all levels has begun presenting significant challenges to the views of materialism in biology and has created a more receptive environment for the soul hypothesis (Shanta BN. Commun Integr Biol 8(5):e1085138, 2015). Therefore, instead of adjudicating different aprioristic claims, the development of an authentic theory of origin of life and universe needs both proper scientific knowledge and the appropriate tools of philosophical analysis of life. This talk will highlight the uniqueness of biological systems that offers a considerable challenge to the mainstream materialism and proposes the Vedāntic philosophical view as a viable alternative for development of a theory worthy of origin of life and universe.

Keywords

Consciousness Reductionism Organic whole Determinism Vedānta Acintya-bhedābheda-tattva 

References

  1. 1.
    Shanta BN. Life and consciousness – the Vedantic view. Commun Integr Biol. 2015;8(5):e1085138.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2015.1085138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mazzocchi F. The limits of reductionism in biology: what alternatives? E-LOGOS: Electron J Philos. 2011;11:1–19; http://nb.vse.cz/kfil/elogos/science/mazzocchi11.pdf.
  3. 3.
    Martin ACR, et al. Protein folds and functions. Structure. 1999;6:875–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(98)00089-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Regenmortel MHV. Biosensors and the search for structure–activity correlations. J Mol Recogn. 1999;12:277–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199909/10)12:5<277::AID-JMR466>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Needleman D, Brugues J. Determining physical principles of subcellular organization. Dev Cell. 2014;29:135–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.04.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Todd RB. The four causes: Aristotle’s exposition and the ancients. J Hist Ideas. 1976;37:319–22.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2708827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berger R. Understanding science: why causes are not enough. Philos Sci. 1998;65:306–32; http://www.jstor.org/stable/188263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  8. 8.
    Waldrop MM. Goodbye to the warm little pond? Science. 1990;250:1078–80.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11536475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelley D. Is it time to throw out ‘primordial soup’ theory? NPR, February 7, 2010. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123447937.
  10. 10.
    Shapiro JA. Evolution: A view from the 21st century. Upper Saddle River: FT Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shanta BN, Muni BV. Why biology is beyond physical sciences? Adv Life Sci. 2016;6(1):13–30.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.als.20160601.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sridhar BR. Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā: the hidden treasure of the sweet Absolute. Kolerganj: Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prabhupada ACBS. Bhagavad-gītā as it is. Los Angeles: Bhaktivedanta Book Trust; 1972.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bacterial bonanza: microbes keep us alive. NPR: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129862107. Accessed 07 July 2015.
  15. 15.
    Sridhar BR. Subjective evolution of consciousness – the play of the sweet Absolute. California: Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math; 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute, Electronic CityBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations