Advertisement

The Syntax and the Semantics of the Deontic Modals yīng 應 and dāng 當 in Early Buddhist Texts

  • Jiajuan Xiong
  • Barbara MeisterernstEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics book series (FiCL, volume 5)

Abstract

Modal verbs in Chinese are a clear instantiation of grammaticalization, to a certain extent comparable to the English modals. All Chinese modals derive from lexical verbs and grammaticalize into markers of deontic and/or epistemic modality, and/or into future markers. The modals當 dā̄ng and應 yīng ‘should’, at issue in this discussion first emerge as modal verbs at the end of the Late Archaic and the beginning of the Middle Chinese periods. In the Buddhist literature, both appear regularly as modal verbs in different functions, although they display some syntactic and semantic differences. This paper approaches the grammaticalization of the two modal verbs from two different perspectives. In the first part of the paper, the diachronic development from lexical verbs to modal auxiliaries is sketched, and their different functions are analyzed within a syntactic framework. The second part of the paper is devoted to the special employment of ying and dang in the Buddhist Vinaya literature.

Keywords

Buddhist Chinese Vinaya Deontic modality Epistemic modality Syntax Grammaticalization 

References

  1. Ademola-Ademoye, Feyisayo Fehintola.2011. A cross-linguistic analysis of finite raising constructions. Ph.D. thesis. University of Kwa-Zulu Natal.Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, Edith. 2012. PPs and applicatives in Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 33 (3): 139–164.Google Scholar
  3. Aldridge, Edith. 2013. Language and Linguistics Compass: Historical Linguistics 7.1: 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderl, Christoph. 2004. Studies in the language of Zu-tang ji 祖堂集, vol. 2. Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Jonny. 2003. A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113 (10): 967–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cinque, Giulielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cormack, Annabel, and Neill Smith. 2002 Modals and negation in English. In Modality and its interaction with the verbal system, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics today, ed. Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema and Wim van der Wurff, 47: 133–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  8. Coupé, Grit, and Ans van Kemenade. 2009. Grammaticalization of modals in Dutch: Uncontingent change. In Historical syntax and linguistic theory, ed. Paola Crisma and Giuseppe Langobardi, 250–270. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2017. Low sentence final particles in Chinese and the final over final constraint. JEAL 26: 37–75.Google Scholar
  10. Gurevič, I.S. 1974. Očerk Grammatiki Kitajskogo Jasyka III.–V. vv [Grammatical Outline of the Chinese Language of the III–V centuries]. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  11. Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammatlicatlization. In Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1, ed. Elisabeth Cross Traugott and Bernd Heine, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, James C-T. 2014. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, ed. Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson, and Dylan W-T Tsai, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Florida: Boca Rota.Google Scholar
  14. Lin, Jowan, and Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspectice. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 66: 53–105.Google Scholar
  15. Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14 (1): 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin, Tzong-Hong Jonah. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  17. Lü, Shuxiang 吕叔湘. 2002. Essentials on Chinese grammar 中国文法要略. Shenyang: Liaoning Education Press.Google Scholar
  18. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2008. Negative markers in combination with the modal auxiliary verbs kě 可 and kěyǐ 可 以. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 37 (2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2011. From obligation to future? A diachronic sketch of the syntax and the semantics of the auxiliary verb dāng 當. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 40 (2): 137–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2012. The language of advice in early Buddhist texts. In Buddhism in Kashmir, ed. Nirmala Sharma. New Delhi: Indian Council for Cultural Relations; Aditya Prakashan.Google Scholar
  21. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2015. Tense and aspect in Han period Chinese: A linguistic study of the Shǐjì. Trends in Modern Linguistics Series, vol. 274. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2016. The syntax of aspecto-temporal adverbs from Late Archaic to early medieval Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2016: 143–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-015-9140-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2017a. Modality and aspect and the role of the subject in Late Archaic and Han period Chinese: Obligation and necessity. Lingua Sinica 3 (10): page numbers?.Google Scholar
  24. Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: Sentence final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68: 77–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. On the fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, Ian, and Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. The (non-)existence of gapping in Chinese and its implications for the theory of gapping. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10: 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Travis, Lisa. 1984. Parameters and effects of word order variation. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  31. Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan. 2008. Left peripheriy and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan. 2015. On the topography of Chinese modals. In Beyond functional sequence, ed. Ur Shlonsky, 275–294. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan, et al. Modal licensing and subject specificity in Mandarin and Taiwan Southern Min: A cartographic analysis (ms.).Google Scholar
  34. Wu, Hsueh-ju. 巫雪如. 2014. Another discussion on the modal meanings of dang in Late Archaic and Middle Chinese and its development into a future tense marker 上古至中古“當”形態語義與未來時發展重探, Taiwan Zhongwen Xuebao 9: 87–142.Google Scholar
  35. Zhu, Guanming 朱冠明. 2008. Moheseng dilü 摩訶僧衹律, Beijing: China Theatre Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Foreign Languages for BusinessSouthwestern University of Finance and EconomicsChengduChina
  2. 2.National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, Institute of LinguisticsHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations