Advertisement

Modality in General Linguistic Investigations Conducted in China Prior to 1949

  • Carlotta SparvoliEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics book series (FiCL, volume 5)

Abstract

This article focuses on the investigations by Li Jinxi (New Grammar of the National Language. Li Jinxi collected works. Heilongjiang Education Press, Harbin, 1924), Lü Shuxiang (Outline of Chinese Grammar. The Commercial Press, Shanghai, 1942a, Outline of Chinese grammar. Collection of Lü Shuxiang’s works. Liaoning Education Press, Shenyang, 1942), Wang Li (Modern Chinese Grammar. Series in Chinese grammar. The Commercial Press, Beijing, 1943, The theory of Chinese grammar. Collection of Wang Li’s works. Shandong Education Press, Jinan, 1944) and Gao Mingkai (On Chinese Grammar. Kaiming shudian, Shanghai, 1948). The aim is shedding light on their notable anticipations of contemporary theories on modality. It will be shown that those works were not confined to a language-specific discourse but had the depth and vastness of the best General Linguistics tradition. After an introduction on the relevant seminal tenets on modality, the article presents five sections focussing on a different critical issue as analysed in the literature above. Namely, the attitudinal theme and the relation between sentential and verbal mood (Sect. 6.2); the illocutionary and propositional levels of modality (Sect. 6.3); the notion of modals as a semantic category (Sect. 6.4); the distinction between modalities of moral duty and mere necessity (Sect. 6.5); modal interdefinability and negation scope (Sect. 6.6).

Keywords

Modality Lü Shuxiang Negation scope Chinese linguistics Non-factuality 

References

  1. Abbiati, Magda. 1993. Ideologia, potere e studi linguistici nella Cina del Grande Balzo. In Intellettuali e potere in Cina, ed. Mario Sabattini, 143–157. Venezia: Cafosca-rina.Google Scholar
  2. Alleton, Viviane. 1984. Les auxiliaires de mode en chinois contemporain. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
  3. Bally, Charles. 1932. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Paris: Librairie Ernest Leroux, 1944.Google Scholar
  4. Brunot, Ferdinand. 1922. La pensée et la langue, Méthodes, principes et plan d’une théorie nouvelle du langage appliquée au français. Paris: Masson et C.ie.Google Scholar
  5. Chappell, Hilary, and Alain Peyraube. 2016. Modality and mood in Sinitic languages. In The Oxford handbooks of mood and modality, ed. Johan van der Auwera and Jan Nuyts, 440–488. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Chengze 陈承泽. 1922. Draft of Chinese grammar 国文法草创. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chiurazzi, Gaetano. 2009. Modalità ed esistenza. Dalla critica della ragion pura alla critica della ragione ermeneutica: Kant, Husserl e Heidegger. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
  8. Chung, Sandra, and Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Grammatical categories and the Lexicon, ed. Timothy Shopen, 241–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  10. Cresti, Emanuela. 2001. Illocuzione e modalità. In La parola al testo. Scritti per Bice Mortara-Garavelli, ed. Gian Luigi Beccaria, and Carla Marello, 133–145. Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
  11. de Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The interaction of modality and negation: A typological study. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gabelentz, Hans Georg Conon v. d. 1881. Chinesische Grammatik. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
  13. Gabelentz, Hans Georg Conon v. d. 1891. Die Sprachwissenschaft: Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: Weigel Nachfolger.Google Scholar
  14. Gao, Mingkai 高名凯. 1948. On Chinese grammar 汉语语法论. Shanghai: Kaiming shudian.Google Scholar
  15. Gao, Mingkai 高名凯. 1958. Critic to the borgeois idealist thoughts in my linguistic work 批判我在语言学工作中的资产阶级思想 Chinese Language 中國語文11:458–463.Google Scholar
  16. Gao, Mingkai 高名凯. 1957. On Chinese grammar 汉语语法论. Rev. ed. Reprint, Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  17. Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  18. Jespersen, Otto. 1933. Essentials of English grammar. Reprint, 2006. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kaufmann, Magdalena, and Stefan Kaufmann. 2016. Modality and Mood in Formal Semantics. In The Oxford handbooks of mood and modality, ed. Johan van der Auwera and Jan Nuyts, 785–820. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kerl, Simon. 1861. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. For the use of schools. New York: Phinney, Blakeman, and Mason.Google Scholar
  21. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1987. On defining modality. Folia Linguistica 21 (1): 67–94.Google Scholar
  22. Kratzer, Angelika. 1976. Was ‘können’ und ‘müssen’ bedeuten können müssen. Linguistische Berichte 42: 128–160.Google Scholar
  23. Kurtz, Joachim. 2011. The discovery of Chinese logic. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, Jinxi 黎锦熙. 1924. New Grammar of the National Language. Li Jinxi collected works, Vol 1. 新著国语文法, 黎锦熙文集, 上卷, ed. Zeyu Li 黎泽渝, and Qing’e Liu 刘庆俄. Reprint, Harbin: Heilongjiang Education Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Boca Raton, FL: DisCom.Google Scholar
  26. Lü, Shuxiang 吕叔湘. 1942a. Outline of Chinese Grammar 中国文法要略. Reprint, Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 1944.Google Scholar
  27. Lü Shuxiang 吕叔湘. 1942b. Outline of Chinese grammar. Collection of Lü Shuxiang’s works, Vol 1. 中国文法要略. 吕叔湘 全集,第一卷. Reprint, Shenyang, Liaoning Education Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 1–2. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ma, Jianzhong 马建忠. 1898. The Grammar of Mr. Ma. Mashi wentong reader. 马氏文通. 马氏文通读本, ed. Shuxiang Lü, and Haifen Wang吕叔湘, 王海棻. Reprint, Shanghai: Education Publishing House, 1986.Google Scholar
  30. Marouzeau, Jules. 1933. Lexique de la terminologie linguistique. Reprint, 1951. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
  31. Narrog, Heiko. 2005. Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 16 (4): 677–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nikolaeva, Irina. 2016. Analyses of the semantics of mood. In The Oxford handbooks of mood and modality, ed. Johan van der Auwera and Jan Nuyts, 117–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen. 2005. On deontic modality, directivity, and mood/A case study of Dutch mogen and moeten. Antwerp Papers in Linguistic 110.Google Scholar
  34. Nuyts, Jan. 2006. Modality: Overview and linguistic issues. In The expression of modality, ed. William Frawley, 1–26. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd ed. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  36. Pellin, Tommaso. 2009. Lessico Grammaticale in Cina (1859–1924). Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  37. Perkins, Michael. R. 1983. Modal expressions in English. Open Linguistics Series. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  38. Peverelli, Peter J. 2015. The history of modern Chinese grammar studies. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Reed, Alonzo, and Brainerd Rellog. 1877. Higher lessons in English. A work on English grammar and composition. New York: Clark & Maynard Publisher.Google Scholar
  41. Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2015. Modals and negation: A semantic explanation of the modal suppletion strategy in Chinese. Chinese as a Second Language Research 4 (2): 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sparvoli, Carlotta. 2012. Deontico e anankastico. Proposta di ampliamento della tassonomia modale basata sull’analisi dei tratti distintivi dei modali cinesi inerenti dovere e necessità. Venezia: Ca’ Foscari. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/1228. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  43. van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.Google Scholar
  44. van der Auwera, Johan, and Alfonso Zamorano Aguilar. 2016. The history of modality and mood. In The Oxford handbooks of mood and modality, ed. Johan van der Auwera and Jan Nuyts, 29–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. von Fintel, Kai. 2006. Modality and Language. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy—Second Edition, ed. Donald M. Borchert. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA. http://mit.edu/fintel/fintel-2006-modality.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  46. Wang, Li 王力. 1943. Modern Chinese Grammar. Series in Chinese grammar 中国现代语法. 汉语语法丛书, introduction by Zhu Dexi 朱德熙. Reprint, Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  47. Wang, Li 王力. 1944. The theory of Chinese grammar. Collection of Wang Li’s works, Vol 1. 中国语法理论. 王力之集, 第一卷, ed. Xiliang Guo 郭锡良. Reprint, Jinan: Shandong Education Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  48. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1951. An essay on modal logic. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. Luitzen Egbertus J. Brouwer, Evert Willem Beth, and Arend Heyting. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  49. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963. Norm and action. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  50. Von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963a. The Varieties of Goodness 1958–1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  51. Zhao, Wei 赵微. 2010. On directives and Chinese imperatives 指令行为与汉语祈使句研. Shanghai: Shanghai zhengfa xueyuan shuwenku.Google Scholar
  52. Zhou, Zumo 周祖谟. 1954. In the linguistic circle, it is necessary to launch an extensive debate and critic for the eradication of bourgeois idealist conceptions 语言学界必须充分展开讨论和批评,肃清资产阶级唯心论的观. Chinese Language 中國語文 12:5–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Asian StudiesUniversity College CorkCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations