A Survey on Research Challenges and Applications in Empowering the SDN-Based Internet of Things

  • Isravel Deva PriyaEmail author
  • Salaja Silas
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 750)


Many challenges arise due to the increase in the number and variety of Internet-connected devices. Modern data center has immensely improved and gained momentum in providing cloud computing services for handling heterogeneous application and for satisfying various customer needs. Internet of things (IoT) enables numerous number of devices with network connectivity to communicate, to gather, and exchange information for providing smarter services. Management and performance tuning of billions of devices that are geographically distributed has become a challenging and complex task. To overcome the limitations of traditional networking, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) technologies were developed. SDN offers flexibility, agility, programmability, and addresses end-to-end connectivity issues that are prevalent in managing dynamic traffic patterns and real-time traffic flows. This paper surveys and investigates the SDN principles, research challenges, and presents an insight into SDN-based IoT.


Software-defined networking Internet of things Data center networks Cloud computing 


  1. 1.
    Bera, S., Misra, S., Vasilakos, A.V.: Software-defined networking for internet of things: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(6), 1994–2008 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masoudi, R., Ghaffari, A.: Software defined networks: a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 67, 1–25 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hu, F., Hao, Q., Bao, K.: A survey on software defined networking (SDN) and openflow: from concept to implementation. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16(4), 2181–2206 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh, S., Jha, R.K.: A survey on software defined networking: architecture for next generation network. J. Netw. Syst. Manage. 25(2), 321–374 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun, W., Menth, M.: Software-defined networking using openflow: protocols, applications and architectural design choices. Future Internet 6(2), 302–336 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farhady, H., Lee, H., Nakao, A.: Software-defined networking: a survey. Comput. Netw. 81, 79–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kreutz, D., Ramos, F.M.V., Verissimo, P., Rothenberg, C.E., Azodolmolky, S., Uhlig, S.: Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey, pp. 1–61 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gong, Y., Huang, W., Wang, W., Lei, Y.: A survey on software defined networking and its applications. Front. Comput. Sci. 9(6), 827–845 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jammal, M., Singh, T., Shami, A., Asal, R., Li, Y.: Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges. Comput. Netw. 72, 74–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karakus, M., Durresi, A.: A survey: control plane scalability issues and approaches in software-defined networking (SDN). Comput. Netw. 112, 279–293 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Da Silva, A.S., Smith, P., Mauthe, A., Schaeffer-Filho, A.: Resilience support in software-defined networking: a survey. Comput. Netw. 92, 189–207 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sterbenz, J.P.G., et al.: Resilience and survivability in communication networks: strategies, principles, and survey of disciplines. Comput. Netw. 54(8), 1245–1265 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heller, B., Sherwood, R., McKeown, N.: The controller placement problem. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Software Defined Networks—HotSDN ’12, p. 7 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, M., Qian, Y., Mao, S., Tang, W., Yang, X.: Software-defined mobile networks security. Mobile Netw. Appl. 21(5), 729–743 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xie, J., Guo, D., Hu, Z., Qu, T., Lv, P.: Control plane of software defined networks: a survey. Comput. Commun. 67, 1–10 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jim, B., Follow, D.: SDN vital to IoT (2014). (Online). Available:
  17. 17.
    Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., Zorzi, M.: Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 1(1), 22–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chahal, M., Harit, S., Mishra, K.K., Sangaiah, A.K., Zheng, Z.: A survey on software-defined networking in vehicular ad hoc networks: challenges, applications and use cases. Sustain. Cities Soc. 35(July), 830–840 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parsaei, M.R., Mohammadi, R., Javidan, R.: A new adaptive traffic engineering method for telesurgery using ACO algorithm over software defined networks. Eur. Res. Telemed. 6(3–4), 173–180 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomovic, S., Yoshigoe, K., Maljevic, I., Radusinovic, I.: Software-defined fog network architecture for IoT. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 92(1), 181–196 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karunya Institute of Technology and SciencesCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations