Econometric Analysis on Product Differentiation and Trade Liberalization of Beef in Japan

  • Kohya Takahashi
  • Koshi MaedaEmail author


In recent years, Japan has been concerned about the impact of trade liberalization on domestic production of beef. The objective of this study is to econometrically analyze the current demand structure for beef in Japan and clarify the respective degrees of product differentiation between imported beef and domestically produced beefs (Japanese beef, hybridize type beef, and dairy beef) by considering the non-stationarity of time series data; subsequently the impact of trade liberalization on domestic production of beef is also considered by studying the case of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement. The main analysis results are as follows. First, Japanese beef and hybridize type beef are differentiated from imported beef; however dairy beef competes with imported beef. Second, the TPP Agreement will not significantly affect the quantities demanded for Japanese beef and hybridize type beef but will decrease the quantity demanded for dairy beef by 8.6%. Third, the current situation is different than the one after the beef tariffication in 1991; thus, we cannot expect a mitigation effect of trade liberalization impact, such as compensating for the decrease in production of dairy beef by the increase in production of Japanese beef.


  1. Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. 2001. Toriniku to keiran no Yunyūryou ni tsuite (About the import quantities of chicken meat and eggs). Chikusan no jouhou: Kokunai hen (Livestock industries information: Domestic edition) 137, 36–37.Google Scholar
  2. Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. 2010. Jukyū doukou wo haaku suru tameno toukei kaisetsu: Gyūniku butaniku hen (Commentary on the statistics for understanding supply and demand trends: Beef and pork edition). Livestock industries information 244, 46–54.Google Scholar
  3. Agriculture & Livestock Industries Corporation. 2015. Chikusan, kokunai toukei shiryou (Livestock, domestic statistical data). Accessed 12 Sept 2015.
  4. Cabinet Secretariat. 2016. TPP no naiyou (Contents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement). Accessed 3 Feb 2016.
  5. Deaton, A., and J. Muellbauer. 1980. An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review 70 (3): 312–326.Google Scholar
  6. DeJong, D.N., J.C. Nankervis, N.E. Savin, and C.H. Whiteman. 1992. The power problems of unit root tests in time series with autoregressive errors. Journal of Econometrics 53(1-3):323–343. Scholar
  7. Dickey, D.A., and W.A. Fuller. 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–431. Scholar
  8. Engle, R.F., and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276. Scholar
  9. Gallant, A.R. 1987. Nonlinear statistical models. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Greene, W.H. 2012. Econometric analysis, 7th ed., International edition. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. Haug, A.A. 1996. Tests for cointegration: A Monte Carlo comparison.Journal of Econometrics 71(1-2):89–115. Scholar
  12. Hayes, D.J., T.I. Wahl, G.W. Williams. 1990. Testing restrictions on a model of Japanese meat demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(3):556–566. Scholar
  13. Kawashima, S., and D.A.P. Sari. 2010. Time-varying armington elasticity and country-of-origin bias: From the dynamic perspective of the Japanese demand for beef imports. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 54(1):27–41. Scholar
  14. Kmenta, J., and R.F. Gilbert. 1968. Small sample properties of alternative estimators of seemingly unrelated regressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63:1180–1200. Scholar
  15. MacKinnon, J.G. 2010. Critical values for cointegration tests. Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper 1227.Google Scholar
  16. Matsuda, T. 2010. Shouhisha juyou bunseki (Consumer demand analysis). In Ouyou keiryou keizaigaku handobukku (Handbook of applied econometrics), ed. C. Minotani, and A. Maki, 39–78. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Matsuda, T. 2014. Hiteijou dēta ni yoru kokusan yunyū nikurui juyou no keiryou bunseki (An analysis of Japanese demand for domestic and imported meats using nonstationary time series data). Journal of the Japanese Society of Agricultural Technology Management 20 (4):127–138.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2015. Hinmoku goto no nourin suisan butsu eno eikyou ni tsuite (About the impact on each item of agricultural, forest and fishery products). Accessed 6 Jan 2016.
  19. Mori, H., and B.H. Lin. 1990. Japanese demand for beef by class: Results of the almost ideal demand system estimation and implications for trade liberalization. Journal of Rural Economics 61 (4): 195–203.Google Scholar
  20. Pantula, S.G., G. Gonzalez-Farias, and W.A. Fuller. 1994. A comparison of unit-root test criteria. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12(4):449–459. Scholar
  21. Park, H.J., and W.A. Fuller. 1995. Alternative estimators and unit root tests for the autoregressive process. Journal of Time Series Analysis 16(4):415-429. Scholar
  22. Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346. Scholar
  23. Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2013. Nikurui ni kansuru sapuraichēn no bunseki: Kokusan gyūniku, butaniku, toriniku wo hikaku shite (Analysis of the meat supply chain: Comparing domestically produced beef, pork and chicken), Sapuraichēn purojekuto kenkyū shiryou dai ni gou (Material for supply chain project, No.2).Google Scholar
  24. Wahl, T.I., D.J. Hayes, and G.W. Williams. 1991. Dynamic adjustment in the Japanese livestock industry under beef import liberalization. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1):118–132. Scholar
  25. Yen, S.T., and W.S. Chern. 1992. Flexible demand systems with serially correlated errors: Fat and oil consumption in the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74(3):689–697. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations