Structural Changes of the Electricity Market in Japan: Theoretical Analysis of Consumers’ Eco-Friendly Behavior

  • Kimihito IseEmail author
  • Masahiro Yabuta


This study analyzes the consumer welfare factors in selecting energy sources in Japan’s electricity market. After the Fukushima Daiichi atomic power plant accident in 2011, Japan has witnessed drastic changes in its electricity market: a tendency toward the promotion of renewable energies such as solar and wind power, and structural changes in its electricity market from regional monopoly to competitiveness. Not only has the market structure transformed toward competitiveness, but the energy development has turned toward renewable power sources as well, among which consumers can choose.


  1. André, F.J., P. González, and N. Porteiro. 2009. Strategic Quality Competition and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57: 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. 1989. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm Glow Giving. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal, S. 2008. Choice and Design of Regulatory Instruments in the Presence of Green Consumers. Resource and Energy Economics 30: 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruvoll, A., and K. Nyborg. 2004. The Cold Shiver of Not Giving Enough: On the Social Cost of Recycling Campaigns. Land Economics 80 (4): 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornes, R., and T. Sandler. 1994. The Comparative Static Properties of the Impure Public Good Model. Journal of Public Economics 54 (3): 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cremer, H., and J.F. Thisse. 1994. Commodity Taxation in a Differentiated Oligopoly. International Economic Review 35 (3): 613–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cremer, H., and J.F. Thisse. 1999. On the Taxation of Polluting Products in a Differentiated Industry. European Economic Review 43: 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cremer, H., F. Gahvari, and N. Ladoux. 2003. Environmental Taxes with Heterogeneous Consumers; An Application to Energy Consumption in France. Journal of Public Economics 87: 2791–2815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eriksson, C. 2004. Can Green Consumerism Replace Environmental Regulation? A Differentiated Products Example. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in Competition. Economic Journal 39: 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kotchen, J. 2005. Impure Public Goods and Comparative Statics of Environmentally Friendly Consumption. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49: 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotchen, J. 2007. Private Provision of Environmental Public Goods: Household Participation in Green-Electricity Programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lambertini, L., A. Tampieri. 2011. Vertical Differentiation in a Cournot Industry: The Porter Hypothesis and Beyond. Accessed 30 April 2012.
  14. Lancaster, K.J. 1979. Variety, Equity, and Efficiency. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lombardini-Riipinen, C. 2005. Optimal Tax Policy under Environmental Quality Competition. Environmental & Resource Economics 32: 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorthy, K.S. 1988. Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly. Marketing Science 7 (2): 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Motta, M. 1993. Endogenous Quality Choice: Price vs. Quantity Competition. The Journal of Industrial Economics XLI: 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory 18: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaked, A., and J. Sutton. 1982. Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation. Review of Economic Studies 49: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Toshimitsu, T. 2010. On the Paradoxical Case of a Consumer-based Environmental Subsidy Policy. Economic Modelling 27: 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yabuta, M., N. Scott. 2010. Ecotourist Behaviour as a Green Consumer. Accessed 30 April 2012.

Web References

  1. Power Generation Cost Analysis Working Group HP. Accessed 15 April 2018.
  2. The Agency for Natural Resources and Energy HP. Accessed 15 April 2018.
  3. The Energy and Environment Council HP. Accessed 15 Sept 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Japan Electric Power Information CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Chuo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations