Analysis on Firm Behavior and Individual’s Utility Maximization Through Regional Agglomeration Economies

  • Daisuke NakamuraEmail author


This paper presents how an individual’s utility can improve under several given constraints, which may include job environment and the level of regional welfare as well as a budget constraint. Here, the job environment can be interpreted to mean that every laborer faces time consumption for work, and thus they need to purchase external services to complete private tasks. The level of regional welfare may partly depend on the extent of local community coordination. Hence, the analysis studies a self-sustaining regional system under limited local resources. The argument also reveals that the availability of local resources and the job environment of each individual can be closely related to each other. As a result, the examination includes the system of the regional economy together with the decision-making behavior of local individuals and firms.



A preliminary version of the paper is presented at the Annual Autumn Meeting of the Japan Association for Applied Economics in October 2017 at Tokyo. This research was partly supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant Number 16K03643.


  1. Evans, A.W. 1972. The Pure Theory of City Size in an Industrial Economy. Urban Studies 9: 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Glaeser, E.L., J. Kolko, and A. Saiz. 2001. Consumer City. Journal of Economic Geography 1: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hanley, N., J. Shogren, and B. White. 2007. Environmental Economics. In Theory and Practice, 2nd ed, 1–5. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Hoover, E.M. 1937. Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Isard, W. 1956. Location and Space-Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Isard, W. 1975. Introduction to Regional Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Lösch, A. 1954[1944]. Die Raümliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft, Fischer, Jena. English edition: Lösch, A. 1954. The Economics of Location (trans: Woglom WH, Stolper WF). New Haven: Yale Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Marshall, A. 1892. Economics of Industry, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan and Co Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Mulligan, G.F., M.D. Partridge, and J.I. Carruthers. 2012. Central Place Theory and Its Reemergence in Regional Science. Annals of Regional Science 48: 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakamura, D. 2016. Alternative Spatial Structure for Sustainable Rural Economy: A Note on Socially Optimal Firm Location. International Regional Science Review 41: 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakamura D. 2018. Location Economics Analysis on Attractiveness of a Region. Studies in Regional Science 48 in printingGoogle Scholar
  12. Parr, J.B. 2002. Agglomeration Economies: Ambiguities and Confusions. Environment and Planning 34: 717–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Parr, J.B. 2015. The City and the Region as Contrasts In Spatial Organization. Annals of Regional Science 54: 797–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parr, J.B. 2017. Central Place Theory: An evaluation. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 29: 151–164.Google Scholar
  15. Weber, A. 1909[1928]. Über den Standort der Industrien. Mohr, Tübingen. English edition: Weber A, 1928. Alfred Weber’s Theory of the Location of Industries (trans: Friedrich CJ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fukuoka Women’s UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations