Will Abenomics Expand Employment?–Interpreting Abenomics Through DSGE Modeling

  • Minoru HayashidaEmail author
  • Masaya Yasuoka
  • Ryoichi Nanba
  • Hiroyuki Ohno


Using data from the first quarter of 1990 until the second quarter of 2013, we performed Bayesian estimation of DSGE model, which was developed from 10 endogenous variables. When we introduced productivity shock, monetary easing shock and preference shock to the estimated DSGE model, we obtained results that were mostly consistent with economic theory. We then analyzed these results to observe what kind of effect the shock of the inflation target, a primal policy of Abenomics, has on the major economic variables, such as employment and the like. To do this, we defined the inflation target’s shock as a shock that leads to the inflation rate deviating in the minus direction from the steady state of expected inflation rate, and calculated the impulse response function. As a result of this analysis, we found that inflation target shock leads to expanded production volume, and higher wage rates and inflation rates. Employment, our subject of focus, also improved. Excluding some parts, these results were also consistent with the trend of the real economy that followed after the start of Abenomics. We also learned that the inflation target’s effect was far more sustainable than monetary easing’s effect.



We would like to thank seminar participants for helpful comments. Research for this paper was supported financially by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 26380367. Nevertheless, any remaining errors are the authors’ responsibility.


  1. Calvo, G. 1983. Staggered Prices in A Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eguchi, M. 2011. Dogakuteki ippan kinko moderu ni yoru zaisei seisaku no bunseki (Analysis of Fiscal Policy Through Dynamic General Equilibrium Modeling), in Japanese, Mitsubishi Economic Research Institute.Google Scholar
  3. Kato, R. 2007. Gendai makurokeizaigaku kōgi (Lecture on Modern Macroeconomics), in Japanese, Toyo Keizai Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Fujiwara, I., and T. Watanabe. 2011. Makuro dōgaku ippan kinkō moderu – sābei to Nihon no makurodēta e no ōyō –, (Dynamic General Equilibrium Model–A Survey with the Application to the Japanese Macroeconomic Date–), in Japanese, Keizai Kenkyu 62 (1): 66–93.Google Scholar
  5. Christiano, L.J., M. Eichenbaum, and C. Evans. 2005. Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy. Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iwata, Y. 2009. Fiscal Policy in an Estimated DSGE Model of the Japanese Economy: Do Non-Ricardian Households Explain All, ESRI Discussion Paper Series No. 216.Google Scholar
  7. Iwata, Y. 2012. Non-Wasteful Government Spending in an Estimated Open Economy DSGE Model: Two Fiscal Policy Puzzles Revisited, ESRI Discussion Paper Series No. 285.Google Scholar
  8. Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2003. An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models of the Euro Area. Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (5): 1123–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2007. Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach. The American Economic Review 97 (3): 586–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sugo, T., and K. Ueda. 2008. Estimating a Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model for Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 22 (4): 476–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minoru Hayashida
    • 1
    Email author
  • Masaya Yasuoka
    • 2
  • Ryoichi Nanba
    • 3
  • Hiroyuki Ohno
    • 4
  1. 1.The University of KitakyushuKitakyushuJapan
  2. 2.Kwansei Gakuin UniversityNishinomiyaJapan
  3. 3.Research DepartmentChubu Region Institute for Social Economic ResearchNagoyaJapan
  4. 4.Toyo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations