Advertisement

Beginning of the Maritime Journey

  • Caroline Chia
Chapter

Abstract

By the end of the first millennium, the Hokkien from southern Fujian were known for their seafaring activities and later travelled to many sites during the mass migration wave of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While much has been discussed about the migratory flow of Hokkien in Taiwan and Nanyang (Southeast Asia), this book takes on a refreshing approach by examining Hokkien theatre in a region very much connected through maritime networks, notably southern Fujian, Taiwan and Singapore. The term ‘Hokkien theatre’ is a collective concept referring to theatrical forms that use Minnan (Hokkien) language as its performing medium (The term ‘Hokkien theatre’ is used in consideration of the various terms proposed by scholars. For example, Lee Tong Soon uses ‘Hokkien wayang’ where ‘wayang’ refers to Chinese street opera, not limited to the Hokkien group in Singapore. ‘Wayang’ is a Malay word for theatrical performance that involved puppets or human dancers but I have not adopted this term as it is less relevant to the southern Fujian and Taiwanese contexts; Wang Yingfen used ‘Hokkien operatic genres’ to refer to Liyuan opera and Gaojia opera. She also sometimes referred to Liyuan opera as Nanguan opera as ‘Nanguan’ is the music used in this theatrical form. See Wang Ying-fen, “The transborder dissemination of nanguan in the Hokkien Quadrangle before and after 1945”, Ethnomusicology Forum, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2016, 59; In his discussion on Amoy-dialect films in the Cold War Era, Jeremy Taylor uses Hokkien opera to refer to Gezaixi and Liyuanxi. As this monograph also deals with puppet theatre, I feel that the use of ‘Hokkien theatre’ can serve as an umbrella term that covers both opera and puppet forms. While Hokkien theatre will be used to refer to the various theatrical forms collectively, specific terms will also be mentioned accordingly. Commonly used terms, such as Fujian theatre (Fujianxi 福建戲) and Min theatre/opera (Minju 閩劇) are also misnomers, which will be avoided here). Originating from southern Fujian, various theatrical forms began to spread to Taiwan and Singapore by the nineteenth century. While scholars have explored the regional theatrical forms in the southern Fujianese and Taiwanese contexts, and with a smaller extent on comparative analysis of Hokkien theatre in both areas, there is little study on how Singapore is connected to this regional network of Hokkien theatre (Chin Ch’ing Hai 2003). This study explores Hokkien as a performing language and outlines the evolution of the various theatrical forms that are subject to the broader socio-cultural and political context. This book represents the first study to examine the transmission of the various forms of Hokkien theatre, which relate to how these theatrical forms strive to stay relevant in an era of urbanization and secularization.

Keywords

Hokkien theatre Regional Nanyang Urbanization Secularization 

References

  1. Bernards, Brian. 2016. Writing the South Seas: Imagining the Nanyang in Chinese and Southeast Asian Postcolonial Literature. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chin, Ch’ing Hai金清海. 2003. Tai min diqu kuileixi yanjiu台閩地區傀儡戲研究. Taibei: Xuehai chuban she.Google Scholar
  3. Chua, Beng Huat. 2000. Taiwan’s Present/Singapore’s Past Medidated by Hokkien Language, Working Papers No. 149, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
  4. George-Graves, Nadine. 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Dance and Theater. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee, Tong Soon. 2009. Chinese Street Opera in Singapore. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lei, Daphne Pi-Wei. 2006. Operatic China: Staging Chinese Identity Across the Pacific. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lockard, Craig A. 2010. “The Sea Common to All”: Maritime Frontiers, Port Cities, and Chinese Traders in the Southeast Asian Age of Commerce, ca. 1400–1750. Journal of World History 21 (2): 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mackerras, Colin. 1983. Chinese Theater: From Its Origins to the Present Day. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ng, Chin-keong. 2017. Boundaries and Beyond: China’s Maritime Southeast in Late Imperial Times. Singapore: NUS Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shih, Shu-Mei, Chien-hsin Tsai, and Brian Bernards, eds. 2013. Sinophone Studies: A Critical Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. So, Billy K.L. 2000. Prosperity, Region, and Institutions in Maritime China: The South Fukien Pattern, 946–1368. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Stock, Jonathan. 2003. Huju: Traditional Opera in Modern Shanghai. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Taylor, Jeremy E. 2011. Rethinking Transnational Chinese Cinemas: The Amoy-dialect Film Industry in Cold War Asia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang, Gungwu. 1959. A Short History of the Nanyang Chinese, Background to Malaya Series, No. 13. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Wang, Ying-fen. 2016. The Transborder Dissemination of Nanguan in the Hokkien Quadrangle Before and After 1945. Ethnomusicology Forum 25 (1): 58–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sung, Yun-Wing. 2009, c1991. The China-Hong Kong Connection: The Key to China’s Open-Door Policy. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Chia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of HumanitiesNanyang Techological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations