Advertisement

Isotope Hydrology

  • U. K. Sinha
  • K. Tirumalesh
  • Hemant V. Mohokar
Chapter

Abstract

Environmental isotopes were introduced into the study of hydrological cycle during the mid-nineteenth century as complementary tools to existing methods like geology, geochemistry, geophysics, etc. for addressing problems pertaining to movement of water, pathways of streams, residence times of groundwater, etc. However, the applications of environmental isotopes as potential tools to unravel many hidden processes and factors governing water, its source and dynamics in all stages of hydrological cycle have gained momentum after the introduction of advanced instruments for isotope measurement of water. In recent times, the critical information that is being obtained from isotopic tools is precipitation contribution to groundwater, efficacy of recharge structures for augmenting groundwater supplies, source and mechanism of groundwater contamination and its transport, sustainability of deep groundwater, etc. The common isotopes that are widely used include 2H, 18O, 13C, 15N and 34S which are stable in nature and 222Rn, 3H and 14C, which are radioactive in nature. While stable isotopes help in understanding the source and mechanism of groundwater recharge based on their natural distribution over space and time, the radioisotopes help in understanding the groundwater residence times and dynamics of any given water system due to their inherent radioactive decay.

Keywords

Environmental isotopes Oxygen-18 Deuterium Tritium Carbon-14 Global meteoric water line 

References

  1. Allison GB (1982) The relationship between 18O and deuterium in water and sand columns undergoing evaporation. J Hydrol 55:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berner RA, Lasaga AC (1989) Modeling the geochemical carbon cycle. Natural geochemical process that result in the slow build up of atmospheric carbon dioxide may have caused past geologic intervals of global warming through the green house effect. Sci Am 260:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigeleisen J (1962) The effects of isotopic substitutions on the rates of chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 56:823–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan K (1919) Classification of springs. J Geol 27:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CAE, Centre for Advanced Engineering (1992) Our waste: our responsibility; towards sustainable waste management in New Zealand. Christchurch. University of Canterbury, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig H (1961a) Standard for reporting concentration of deuterium and oxygen-18 in natural waters. Science 133:1833–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Craig H (1961b) Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133:1702–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig H, Boato G, White DE (1956) Proc. 2nd conf. National Academy of science- National research council 400. pp 29–38Google Scholar
  9. Dansgaard W (1964) Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16:436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farquhar GJ (1989) Leachate: production and characterization. Can J Civ Eng 16:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fontes JC, Pouchan P, Saliege JF, Zuppi GM (1980) Environmental isotope study in the groundwater system of the Republic of Djibouti. Arid –Zone Hydrology: Investigations with Isotope Techniques, IAEA, Vienna, pp 237–262Google Scholar
  12. Friedman I (1953) Deuterium content of natural water and other substances. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 4:89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fritz P, Reardon EJ, Brown RM, Cherry JA, Killey RWO, Mcnaughton D (1978) The carbon isotope geochemistry of a small groundwater system in northern Ontario. Water Resour Res 14:1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritz SJ, Drimmie RJ, Fritz P (1991) Characterising shallow aquifers using tritium and 14C: periodic sampling based on tritium half-life. Appl Geochem 6:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godwin H (1962) Half life of radiocarbon. Nature 195:984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonfiantini R (1983) Stable isotope reference samples for geochemical and hydrological investigations. Report Adv. Group Meeting, Vienna. 77 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Hackley KC, Liu CL, Coleman DD (1996) Environmental isotope characteristics of landfill leachates and gases. Ground Water 34(5):827–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris RC, Lowe DR (1984) Changes in the organic fraction of leachate from two domestic refuse sites on the Sherwood Sandstone, Nottinghamshire. Q J Eng Geol 117:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris RC, Parry EL (1982) Investigations into domestic refuse leachate attenuation in the unsaturated zone of Triassic sandstones, in effects of waste disposal on groundwater and surface water. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 139:147–155Google Scholar
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency (1981) Statistical treatment of environmental isotope data in precipitation, Technical Report Series 206. IAEA, Vienna 255 pGoogle Scholar
  21. International Atomic Energy Agency (1984) Report on advisory group meeting on stable isotopes reference for geochemical hydrochemical investigationsGoogle Scholar
  22. International Atomic Energy Agency (1992) Statistical treatment of environmental isotope data in precipitation, Technical Report Series 331. IAEA, Vienna 781 pGoogle Scholar
  23. Keeling CD (1958) The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 13:322–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lal D, Peters B (1967) Cosmic-ray produced radioactivity on the Earth. In: Sitte K (ed) Handbuch der Physik 46. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 551–612Google Scholar
  25. Lambs L (2000) Correlation of conductivity and stable isotope 18O for the assessment of water origin in river system. Chem Geol 164(1–2, 6):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lansdown JM, Quay PD, King SL (1992) CH4 production via CO2 reduction in temperate bog: a source of 13C depleted CH4. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 56:3493–3503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Libby WF (1946) Atmospheric helium three and radiocarbon from cosmic radiation. Phys Rev 69:671–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu CL, Hackley KC, Baker J (1992) Application of environmental isotopes to characterize landfill gases and leachate. Geological Society of America. Abstracts with Programs, 1992 Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH, P A35Google Scholar
  29. Meinzer OE (1923) The occurrence of groundwater in the United States, U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 489. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Mook WG (1983) International comparison of proportional gas counters for 14C activity measurements. Radiocarbon 25(2):475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulvey P (1997) Conceptual model for monitoring landfill leachate. ISWA ‘97 World Conference, Wellington, NZGoogle Scholar
  32. Navada SV (1988) Application of environmental isotope geochemistry in hydrological studies. A thesis submitted to Bombay UniversityGoogle Scholar
  33. Nier AO (1950) A redetermination of the relative abundances of the isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, argon and potassium. Phys Rev 77:789–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Brien K, Lerner AD, Shea MA, Smart DF (1992) The production of cosmogenic isotopes in the earth’s atmosphere and their inventories. In: Sonett CP, Giampapa MS, Mathew MS (eds) The sun in time. Univ. Arizona Press, pp 317–342Google Scholar
  35. Report on Water seepage on Jodhpur city (1998) Groundwater Department Jodhpur, Rajasthan, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  36. Rozanski K, Gonfiantini R, Araguas–Araguas L (1991) Tritium in the global atmosphere: distribution patterns and recent trends. J Phys G: Nucl Part Phys 17:S523–S536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanford WE, Shropshire RG, Solomon DK (1996) Dissolved gas tracers in groundwater: simplified injection, sampling, and analysis. Water Resour Res 32:1635–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shivanna K, Tirumalesh K, Noble J, Joseph TB, Singh G, Joshi AP, Khati VS (2008) Isotope techniques to identify recharge areas of springs for rainwater harvesting in mountainous regions of Gaucher area, Chamoli District, Uttarakhand. Curr Sci 94(8):1003–1011Google Scholar
  39. Singh P, Kumar N (1996) Determination of snow melt factor in the Himalayan region. Hydrol Sci 41:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh P, Quick MC (1993) Stream simulation of Satluj river in the western Himalayas. Snow and Glacier Hydrology (Proceeding of the Kathmandu Symposium, November 1992). IAHS Publ. No. 218. pp 261–271Google Scholar
  41. Singh P, Jain SR, Kumar N (1997) Estimation of snow and glacier-melt contribution to the Chenab river, western Himalayas. Mt Res Dev 17:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thatcher LL (1962) The distribution of fallout over North America. Bull Int Assoc Sci Hydrol 7:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. United Nations; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2006) World urbanisation prospects: the 2005 revision. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/200Google Scholar
  44. Unterweger MP, Coursey BM, Schima FJ, Mann WG (1978) Preparation and calibration of the 1978 National Bureau of Standards tritiated-water standards. Intern J Appl Rad Isot 31:611–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vogel JC, Ehhalt D (1963) The use of carbon isotopes in ground water studies, Proc. Conf. on Isotopes in Hydrology, IAEA, Vienna. pp 383–396Google Scholar
  46. Walker FW, Parrington JR, Feiner F (1989). Nuclides and isotopes, 14th edn. 57 ppGoogle Scholar
  47. Yurtsever Y (1975) Worldwide survey of isotopes in precipitation. IAEA report, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  48. Zuppi GM, Fontes JC, Letolle R (1974) Isotopes du milieu et circulations d’eaux sulfurees dans le latium, Proceedings of a Symposium on Isotope Techniques in Groundwater Hydrology, vol 1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, p 341Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. K. Sinha
    • 1
  • K. Tirumalesh
    • 1
  • Hemant V. Mohokar
    • 1
  1. 1.Isotope Hydrology Section, Isotope and Radiation Application DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations