Advertisement

Brain Tumor Segmentation with Skull Stripping and Modified Fuzzy C-Means

  • Aniket BileniaEmail author
  • Daksh Sharma
  • Himanshu Raj
  • Rahul Raman
  • Mahua Bhattacharya
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 106)

Abstract

For medical image processing, brain tumor segmentation is one of the most researched topics. Diagnosis at an early stage plays a vital role in saving a patient’s life. It is troublesome to segment the tumor region from an MRI due to unavailability of a sharper edge and properly visible boundaries. In this paper, a combination of skull stripping methods and modified fuzzy c-means is presented to segment out the tumor region. After the acquired image is denoised, it is stripped of irrelevant tissues on the outer boundaries. It is further processed through the fuzzy c-means algorithm. The obtained results were proven to be better compared to the standard fuzzy c-means when applied on a sample of 100 MRIs.

Keywords

MRI Fuzzy c-means Skull stripping Image denoising 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management. The dataset for testing our implementations was acquired from BRATS 2015, from which 100 MRI files (.mat format in T1 modality) were sampled out of 700 images.

References

  1. 1.
    Dale, A.M., Halgren, E.: Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11(2), 202–208 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karnan, M., Logheshwari, T.: Improved implementation of brain MRI image segmentation using ant colony system. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Srivastava, A. Asati, and M. Bhattacharya, “A fast and noise-adaptive rough-fuzzy hybrid algorithm for medical image segmentation. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 416–421. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayoobkhan, M.U.A., Chikkannan, E., Ramakrishnan, K.: Feed-forward neural network-based predictive image coding for medical image compression. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prastawa, M., Bullitt, E., Ho, S., Gerig, G.: A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection. Med. Image Anal. 8(3), 275–283 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pham, D.L., Prince, J.L.: An adaptive fuzzy c-means algorithm for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 20(1), 57–68 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, W., Giger, M.L., Bick, U.: A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced mr images. Acad. Radiol. 13(1), 63–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley, P., Bennett, K., Demiriz, A.: Constrained k-means clustering. Microsoft Res. 1–8 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sled, J.G., Zijdenbos, A.P., Evans, A.C.: A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17(1), 87–97 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pohle, R., Toennies, K.D.: Segmentation of medical images using adaptive region growing. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 4322, pp. 1337–1346 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniket Bilenia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daksh Sharma
    • 1
  • Himanshu Raj
    • 1
  • Rahul Raman
    • 1
  • Mahua Bhattacharya
    • 1
  1. 1.Atal Bihari Vajpayee Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management, GwaliorGwaliorIndia

Personalised recommendations