Advertisement

From Obedience to Resistance: Understanding Equal Rights to Education Movement as a Cultural Process

  • Anqi Liu
Chapter
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)

Abstract

The current ethnographic study attempts to examine the Equal Rights to Education Movement in China and to understand it as a cultural process. Aiming at the removal of hukou limitation in education, the movement is allegedly the biggest social movement in China since decades. Adopting a grounded theory approach, the study gathered data from interviews, participatory observations and reviews of movement-generated material. The movement’s role as a cultural process is underlined: aggrieved participants got involved with the motivation to stop private experiences of injury, which was subsequently expanded to fighting for the collective ‘we’. From subject to citizens, activists gained awareness of their rights and autonomy vis-a-vis state’s colonisation of life and values. The movement also provided a site within which horizontal self-organisation as well as deliberation with opposition was practised.

Keywords

Chinese activism Migrant worker Rights to education Cultural process Solidarity Civic consciousness Self-organisation 

References

  1. Amenta, E., & Young, M. P. (1999). Democratic States and Social Movements: Theoretical Arguments and Hypotheses. Social Problems, 57, 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auyero, J. (2004). When Everyday Life, Routine Politics, and Protest Meet. Theory and Society, 33(3–4), 417–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education. (2014, April 18). Suggestions of Educational Committee of Beijing on Enrolment of Students in Compulsory Education Period in 2014. http://www.bjedu.gov.cn/publish/portal27/tab1654/info37238.htm.
  4. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, Beijing Municipal Comission of Development and Reform, Beijing Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau and Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau. (2012, December 29). Plans for Children of Migrant Workers to Apply for Entrance Exams After Completion of Compulsory Education. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-01/05/content_2305015.htm.
  5. Bray, Z. (2008). Ethnographic Approaches. In D. Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 296–315). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caster, M. (2014, June 6). The Contentious Politics of China’s New Citizens Movement. https://www.opendemocracy.net/civilresistance/michael-caster/contentious-politics-of-china’s-new-citizens-movement. Accessed 1 April 2015.
  7. della Porta, D. (2014). Mobilizing for Democracy: Comparing 1989 and 2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (2013). Power and Democracy in Social Movements. In D. della Porta (Ed.), Meeting Democracy: Power and Deliberation in Global Justice Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diani, M. (1997). Social Movements and Social Capital: A Network Perspective on Movement Outcomes. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 129–47.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards. (2011). Introduction: Civil Society and the Geometry of Human Relations. In M. Edwards (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society (pp. 3–14). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fine, G. (1995). Public Narration and Group Culture: Discerning Discourse in Social Movements. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Ed.), Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Collective Identity in Social Movements: Central Concepts and Debates: Collective Identity in Social Movements. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foweraker, J., & Landman, T. (1997). Citizenship Rights and Social Movements: A Comparative and Statistical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gamson, W. (1975). The Strategy of Social Protest. Madison, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  15. Giugni, M. (1998). Was It Worth The Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publisher.Google Scholar
  17. Goldman, M. (2002). The Reassertion of Political Citizenship in the Post-Mao Era: The Democracy Wall Movement. In M. Goldman & E. Perry (Ed.), Changing Meanings of Citizenship in Modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In C. Craig (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 421–461). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ho, P. (2008). Embedded Activism and Political Change in a Semiauthoritarian Context. In P. Ho (Ed.), China’s Embedded Activism: Opportunities and Constraints of a Social Movement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Honneth, A. (1995). Disrespect and Resistance: The Moral Logic of Social Conflicts. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (pp. 160–170). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hsing, Y., & Lee, C. (2010). Reclaiming Chinese Society: The New Social Activism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jin, J. (2011). Institutionalized Official Hostility and Protest Leader Logic: A Long-Term Chinese Peasants Collective Protest at Dahe Dam in the 1980s. In J. Broadbent & V. Brockman (Eds.), East Asian Social Movements Power, Protest, and Change in a Dynamic Region (pp. 413–436). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Johnston, H., & Klandermans, B. (1995). The Cultural Analysis of Social Movements. In H. Johnston & B. Klandermans (Ed.), Social Movements and Culture (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  24. Klandermans, B. (1989). Introduction: Social Movement Organizations and the Study of Social Movements. In B. Klandermans (Ed.), Organizing for Change: Social Movement Organizations in Europe and the United States (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, Citizenship, and Social Development; Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  27. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, D. S., & Whittier, N. (1994). Social Movement Spillover. Social Problems, 41(2), 277–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morris, A. (1992). Political Consciousness and Collective Action. In A. Morris & C. Mueller (Ed.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2010). 2010 Population Census. http://www.stats.gov.cn.
  31. New Citizens’ Movement (China). (n.d.). http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/New_Citizens’_Movement_(China)#Equal_rights_for_education. Accessed 3 March 2015.
  32. O’Brien, K., & Li, L. (2006). Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. O’Brien, K. J., & Stern, R. E. (2008). Studying Contention in Contemporary China (July 7, 2007). In Kevin J. O’Brien (Ed.), Popular Protest in China (pp. 11–25, 219–225). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  35. Perry, E. (1985). Rural Violence in Socialist China. The China Quarterly, 103, 414–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perry, E. (2002). Challenging the Mandate of Heaven: Social Protest and State Power in China. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  37. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rochon, T., & Mazmanian, D. (1993). Social Movements and the Policy Process. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rucht, D. (1992). Studying the Effects of Social Movements: Conceptualizations and Problems. ECPR Joint Sessions, Limerick.Google Scholar
  40. Shemtov, R. (2003). Social Networks and Sustained Activism in Local NIMBY Campaigns. Sociological Forum, 19(2), 215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shils, E. (1997). The Virtue of Civility: Selected Essays on Liberalism, Tradition, and Civil Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  42. Tarrow, S. (2008). The New Contentious Politics in China: Poor and Blank or Rich and Complex. In K. O’Brien (Ed.), Popular Protest in China (pp. 1–10). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Xia, Y., & Guan, B. (2014). The Politics of Citizenship Formation: Homeowners’ Collective Action in Urban Beijing. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 19(4), 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu, Z. (2014, January 23). For Freedom, Justice and Love—My Closing Statement to the Court. http://chinachange.org/2014/01/23/for-freedom-justice-and-love-my-closing-statement-to-the-court/. Accessed 20 April 2015.
  45. ‘Xu Zhiyong and New Citizen Movement’. (2013, July 29). Radio Free Asia. http://www.rfa.org/mandarin/zhuanlan/zhongguotoushi/panel-07292013105036.html.
  46. Yang, G. (2008). Contention in Cyberspace. In K. O’Brien (Ed.) Popular Protest in China (pp. 126–143) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Yang, G. (2009). The Power of the Internet in China: Citizen Activism Online. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zhao, D. (2001). The Power of Tiananmen State-Society Relations and the 1989 Beijing Student Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anqi Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Albert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations