Advertisement

The European Union and the Asian Security Order: Normative Aspirations and Strategic Interests

  • Manasi Singh
Chapter

Abstract

As the European Union (EU) grapples with multiple challenges, Manasi Singh argues that its presence as a more coherent and visible foreign policy actor needs renewed attention. Interestingly, the EU Global Strategy 2016 talks about a fully fledged role in Asia for the EU, emphasising economic diplomacy, inter-regionalism and scaling-up Europe’s security role in the region. Although the EU has been caught up with security issues in its neighbourhood, it is keen to ‘pivot’ towards Asia, given its high economic stakes and maritime interests in the region. The chapter discusses the EU’s normative aspirations in reinforcing and expanding a rules-based global order while simultaneously balancing its strategic interests in terms of regional powers in Asia.

Keywords

European Union Asia EU Global Strategy Normative power Security Global Order 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organisation, 58(2), 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2012). Common Security with Asia: Changing Europe’s Role from Model to Partner. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/09525.pdf.
  3. Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical Power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, D., & Smith, M. (1990). Western Europe’s Presence in the Contemporary International Arena. Review of International Studies, 16(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicchi, F. (2006). ‘Our Size Fits All’: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börzel, T., & Risse, T. (2009). Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism: The EU as a Model of Regional Integration. KFG Working Paper Series 7. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-368027.
  7. Britsch, F. (2014). Indian Views of Europe’s Role as Security Actor: Why the EU Needs to Change Its Approach Towards India. FES Perspective, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/10717.pdf.
  8. Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2000). International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cameron, F. (2017). ‘It’s Asia, Stupid’: Time for the EU to Deepen Relations with Asia. GIGA Focus Asia 6. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from https://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/system/files/publications/gf_asien_1706_en.pdf.
  10. Chaban, N., & Holland, M. (Eds.). (2005). The EU Through the Eyes of the Asia-Pacific: Public Perceptions and Media Representations. NCRE Research Series No. Canterbury: National Centre for Research on Europe, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, R. (2004). The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Cross, M. K. D. (2016). The EU Global Strategy and Diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crossick, S., & Reuter, E. (Eds.). (2007). China-EU: A Common Future. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  14. Dannreuther, R. (Ed.). (2004). European Union Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Neighbourhood Strategy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Diez, T. (2013). Normative Power as Hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duchêne, F. (1971). A New European Defense Community. Foreign Affairs, 50(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engelbrekt, K. (2012). The Missing Link in the EU’s Nascent Strategic Approach Toward Asia: Military Diplomacy. Asia-Pacific Review, 19(2), 62–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. (1994). Towards a New Asia Strategy. Retrieved September 25, 2017, from http://aei.pitt.edu/2949/1/2949.pdf.
  19. European Commission. (2001). Europe and Asia: A Strategic Framework for Partnership. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-europe-asia-strategic-framework-com2001469-20010904_en.pdf.
  20. European Commission. (2003). European Security Strategy – A Secure Europe in a Better World. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/file/10/download?token=ubYn8qBQ.
  21. European Commission. (2007). Regional Programming for Asia – Strategy Document 2007–2013. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/rsp-asia-2007-2013_en.pdf.
  22. European Commission. (2013). EU-Myanmar Task Force. Press Release. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1062_en.htm.
  23. European Commission. (2016). The European Union Global Strategy 2016. Retrieved September 25, 2017, from https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/global-strategy-foreign-and-security-policy-european-union.
  24. European External Action Service (EEAS). (2016). Fight Against Piracy. Retrieved September 2, 2017, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/428/Fight%20against%20piracy.
  25. Falkner, R. (2007). The Political Economy of ‘Normative Power’ Europe: EU Environmental Leadership in International Biotechnology Regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 507–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall, I. (2017). Multialignment and Indian Foreign Policy Under Narendra Modi. The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 105(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., & Rüland, J. (2006). Interregionalism: A New Phenomenon in International Relations: Interregionalism and International Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Haukkala, H. (2010). The EU-Russia Strategic Partnership: The Limits of Post-Sovereignty in International Relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill, C. (1993). The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hyde-Price, A. (2006). ‘Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaishankar, S. (2015, July 20). India, the United States and China. IISS Fullerton Lecture. Retrieved December 20, 2017, from http://mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/25493/IISS_Fullerton_Lecture_by_Dr_S_Jaishankar_Foreign_Secretary_in_Singapore.
  32. Jinping, X. (2014). On the Governance of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 315–324, Cited in William A. Callahan. China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the New Eurasian Order. NUPI Policy Brief 2. Norway: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2401876.
  33. Juncker, J. C. (2017, October 6). Partners, Naturally. The Indian Express.Google Scholar
  34. Kavalski, E. (2007). Partnership or Rivalry Between the EU, China and India in Central Asia: The Normative Power of Regional Actors with Global Aspirations. European Law Journal, 13(6), 839–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kundu, S. (2017). India as the Regional Leader in Maintaining Security in the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved December 11, 2017, from http://www.orfonline.org/expert-speaks/india-as-regional-leader-maintaining-security-indo-pacific/.
  36. Laïdi, Z. (2007). Europe and World Governance: Norms over Force. Sciences po in China Working Paper 2. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from http://www.laidi.com/papiers/normative_powersciencespo_china.pdf.
  37. Langan, M. (2012). Normative Power Europe and the Moral Economy of Africa–EU Ties: A Conceptual Reorientation of ‘Normative Power’. New Political Economy, 17(3), 243–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larsen, H. (2014). Normative Power Europe and the Importance of Discursive Context: The European Union and the Politics of Religion. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(4), 419–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucarelli, S. (2014). Seen from the Outside: The State of the Art on the External Image of the EU. Journal of European Integration, 36(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucarelli, S., & Manners, I. (Eds.). (2006). Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Maier-Knapp, N. (2014). The European Union as a Normative Actor and Its External Relations with Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 10(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
  42. Manners, I. (2002). Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, M. (2011). Human Security and the Search for a Normative Narrative. In R. G. Whitman (Ed.), Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 187–209). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, H. (2008). Is It Still Called ‘Chinese Whispers’? The EU’s Rhetoric and Action as a Responsible Global Institution. International Affairs, 84(1), 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mogherini, F. (2015). Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue 2015. Retrieved August 27, 2017, from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/6254/speech-by-high-representativevice-president-federica-mogherini-at-the-iiss-shangri-la-dialogue-2015_en.
  46. Mousavian, H. S. (2016). EU-Iran Relations After Brexit. Survival, 58(5), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  48. Press Information Bureau. (2017, October 6). India – EU Joint Statement During 14th India-EU Summit. New Delhi: Press Information Bureau, Government of India. Retrieved December 5, 2017, from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=171462.
  49. Raja Mohan, C. (2017, May 30). European Liaisons. The Indian Express.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenau, J. (1995). Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13–43.Google Scholar
  51. Saran, S., Price, G., Wilkins, J.-J., & Gupta, K. (2016). Prospects for EU–India Security Cooperation. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  52. Seeberg, P. (2009). The EU as a Realist Actor in Normative Clothes: EU Democracy Promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy. Democratization, 16(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh, M. (2016). Democracy Promotion in the EU’s Neighborhood: Renegotiating the Framework Post Arab Spring. In S. Romaniuk & M. Marlin (Eds.), Democracy and Civil Society (pp. 31–42). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Sjursen, H. (2006). The EU as a ‘Normative’ Power: How Can This Be? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, K. E. (2000). The End of Civilian Power EU: A Welcome Demise or Cause for Concern? The International Spectator, 35, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. (2003). The Framing of European Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Post-Modern Policy Framework? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 556–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stewart, S. (2009). Russia and the Eastern Partnership. SWP Comments 7. Retrieved August 25, 2017, https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2009C07_stw_ks.pdf.
  58. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (2015). Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. SIPRI Yearbook. Stockholm: SIPRI. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2016-03/YB-15-Summary-EN.pdf.
  59. Weber, K. (2013). The ASEAN Regional Forum and the EU’s Role in Promoting Security in the Asia-Pacific. In T. Christiansen, E. Kirchner, & P. Murray (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations (pp. 344–358). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Youngs, R. (2004). Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Youngs, R. (2015). Keeping EU–Asia Reengagement on Track. Carnegie Europe. Retrieved September 2, 2017, from http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/eu_asia_reengagement.pdf.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manasi Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Security Studies, School of International StudiesCentral University of GujaratGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations