Advertisement

Algal-Bacterial System: A Novel Low-Cost Biotechnological Initiative in Wastewater Treatment

  • Kalpana SahooEmail author
  • Rajesh Kumar Sahoo
  • Mahendra Gaur
  • Enketeswara Subudhi
Chapter

Abstract

Algal-bacterial process biotechnology is a recent low-cost method toward toxic pollutant removal from wastewater that has received more attention in the present scenario. The pollutants are mainly categorized into inorganic, organic, radioactive, acid/base, etc. The water pollutants mainly include SO2 from power plants, chemical waste, fertilizers from agricultural use, oil spillage, silt, harmful pesticides, detergents, harmful compounds in cosmetics, pathogenic bacteria from livestock operations and food processing wastes, and chemical compounds found in cosmetics products, effluent outfalls from factories, refineries, waste treatment plants, contaminants from improper disposal of industrial wastes running through rainwater, etc. The proper pretreatment of wastewater needs to be done before disposal to the water bodies unless it would cause serious damage to our entire ecosystem. Algae, mostly behaving as water-purifying agent acting as pollution indicator, can act as a better alternative toward bioremediation through low-cost approach. Due to certain limitations in the algal cell during toxic pollutant accumulation, sometimes it can remediate contaminants up to a certain level. So another emerging concept of algal-bacterial symbiotic system, a less energy consumption technology, was developed which gained much attention toward wastewater treatment in the present scenario. Introduction of cost-effective algal-bacterial consortia treatment technology is reported to treat toxic wastewater effluents from municipal, domestic, industrial, and agricultural activities by using many special unicellular microalgae and pollutant-specific-degrading bacteria. It has been found from recent studies that two important factors such as selection of suitable strain as well as cultivation are responsible for biodegrading toxic chemicals and compounds such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phenolics, and organic solvents. The organic compounds released after algal photosynthesis can ultimately become a food source for a variety of heterotrophic microbes. The growth-promoting substance production by bacteria can promote microalgal growth, whereas few bacteria can promote algal growth by photosynthetic oxygen tension reduction inside the algal cell, e.g., Pseudomonas diminuta and P. vesicularis. The wastewater can be treated in an open system, i.e., by the construction of artificial ponds, or closed system, i.e., using a bioreactor. From the available reports, it was found that the algal-bacterial consortium may include mainly microalgae and bacteria, e.g., Flavobacteriia, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteroidia, and β-proteobacteria. The harmful dissolved methane in anaerobically treated wastewater can effectively be treated by the methane-oxidizing bacteria and algae. It can be concluded that the conventional algal-bacterial system treatment technology acts as a natural biological treatment method as a viable alternative and is of great importance for achieving good wastewater treatment performance as well as the reduction in energy consumption cost.

Keywords

Algal-bacterial culture system Wastewater treatment Toxic pollutants Bioreactor Low-cost alternative technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Raouf N, Al-Homaidan AA, Ibraheem IBM (2012) Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci 19:257–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abeliovich A (1986) Algae in wastewater oxidation ponds. In: Handbook of microalgal mass culture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 331–338Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abeliovich A, Azov Y (1976) Toxicity of ammonia to algae in sewage oxidation ponds. Appl Environ Microbiol 31:801–806Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aksmann A, Tukaj Z (2004) The effect of anthracene and phenanthrene on the growth, photosynthesis, and SOD activity of the green alga Scenedesmus armatus depends on the PAR irradiance and CO2 level. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-2297-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander HC, Dill DC, Smith LW et al (1988) Bisphenol a: Acute aquatic toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 7:19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620070104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aziz MA, Ng WJ (1993) Industrial wastewater treatment using an activated algae-reactor. Water Sci Technol (United Kingdom) 28:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borde X, Guieysse B, Delgado O et al (2003) Synergistic relationships in algal-bacterial microcosms for the treatment of aromatic pollutants. Bioresour Technol 86:293–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00074-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borowitzka MA (1999) Commercial production of microalgae: ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters. J Biotechnol 70:313–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00083-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buys BR, Mosquera-Corral A, Sánchez M, Méndez R (2000) Development and application of a denitrification test based on gas production. Water Sci Technol 41:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cousins IT, Staples CA, Klecka GM, Mackay D (2002) A multimedia assessment of the environmental fate of bisphenol A. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:1107–1135.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1080-700291905846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Croft MT, Lawrence AD, Raux-Deery E et al (2005) Algae acquire vitamin B12 through a symbiotic relationship with bacteria. Nature 438:90–93.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dakhama A, de la Noüe J, Lavoie MC (1993) Isolation and identification of antialgal substances produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Appl Phycol 5:297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De-Bashan LE, Moreno M, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2002) Removal of ammonium and phosphorus ions from synthetic wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris coimmobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Water Res 36:2941–2948.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00522-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De-Bashan LE, Trejo A, Huss VAR et al (2008) Chlorella sorokiniana UTEX 2805, a heat and intense, sunlight-tolerant microalga with potential for removing ammonium from wastewater. Bioresour Technol 99:4980–4989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de-Bashan LE, Bashan Y (2004) Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Res 38:4222–4246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Droste RL (1997) Relationship of algae to water pollution and waste water treatment. In: Water Treatment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eio EJ, Kawai M, Niwa C et al (2015) Biodegradation of bisphenol A by an algal-bacterial system. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(19):15145–15153.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4693-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    EPA (2009) National water quality inventory: report to congress, 2004 reporting cycle.” US Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Filip DS, Thomas Peters V, Dean Adams E, Middlebrooks J (1979) Residual heavy metal removal by an algae-intermittent sand filtration system. Water Res 13(3):305–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90211-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fukami K, Nishijima T, Ishida Y (1997) Stimulative and inhibitory effects of bacteria on the growth of microalgae. Hydrobiologia 358(1-3):185–191.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003139402315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonzalez LE, Bashan Y (2000) Increased growth of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris when coimmobilized and cocultured in alginate beads with the plant-growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(4):1527–1531.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.4.1527-1531.2000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    http://Algal-bacterial(ALBA)wastewatertreatment_algae-biogasproject.htmGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Imase M, Watanabe K, Aoyagi H, Tanaka H (2008) Construction of an artificial symbiotic community using a Chlorella-symbiont association as a model. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:273–282.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00434.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jia H, Yuan Q (2016) Removal of nitrogen from wastewater using microalgae and microalgae-bacteria consortia. Cogent Environ Sci 2:1275089.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2016.1275089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khin T, Annachhatre A (2004) Novel microbial nitrogen removal processes. Biotechnol Adv 22(7):519–532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krishnan AV, Stathis P, Permuth SF et al (1993) Bisphenol-A: an estrogenic substance is released from polycarbonate flasks during autoclaving. Endocrinology 132:2279–2286.  https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.132.6.8504731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li T, Zheng Y, Yu L, Chen S (2013) High productivity cultivation of a heat-resistant microalga Chlorella sorokiniana for biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 131:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liang Z, Liu Y, Ge F et al (2013) Efficiency assessment and pH effect in removing nitrogen and phosphorus by algae-bacteria combined system of Chlorella vulgaris and Bacillus licheniformis. Chemosphere 92:1383–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lim SL, Chu WL, Phang SM (2010) Use of Chlorella vulgaris for bioremediation of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 101:7314–7322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ludwig HF, Oswald WJ, Gotaas HB, Lynch V (1951) Algae symbiosis in oxidation ponds: I. growth characteristics of “Euglena Gracilis” cultured in sewage. Sewage Ind Waste 23:1337–1355.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25031742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mackenthum K (1969) The practice of water pollution biology. U. S. Department of the Interior, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (Now EPA) U.S.D.I., Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mara DD, Pearson H (1986) Artificial freshwater environment: waste stabilization ponds. Biotechnology 8:177–206Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Morita M, Watanabe Y, Saiki H (2000) High photosynthetic productivity of green microalga Chlorella sorokiniana. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 87:203–218.  https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:87:3:203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mouchet P (1986) Algae reactions to mineral and organic micropollutants, ecological consequences and possibilities for industrial-scale application: a review. Water Res 20:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mouget JL, Dakhama A, Lavoie MC, de la Noüe J (1995) Algal growth enhancement by bacteria: is consumption of photosynthetic oxygen involved? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 18:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-6496(95)00038-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Munoz R, Guieysse B (2006) Algal-bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review. Water Res 40:2799–2815.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Munoz R, Kollner C, Guieysse B, Mattiasson B (2004) Photosynthetically oxygenated salicylate biodegradation in a continuous stirred tank photobioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 87:797–803.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nakajima A, Horikoshi T, Sakaguchi T (1981) Studies on the accumulation of heavy metal elements in biological systems XVII. Selective accumulation of heavy metal ions by Chlorella vulgaris. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 12:76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01970040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Olguín EJ (2003) Phycoremediation: Key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal processes. Biotechnol Adv 22:81–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(03)00130-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Oswald WJ (1988) Micro-algae and waste-water treatment. In: Micro-algal biotechnology. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–328Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Oswald WJ (1995) Ponds in the twenty-first century. Water Sci Technol 31:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1223(95)00487-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pink DH (2006) Investing in tomorrow’s liquid gold. Retrieved from http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/trenddesk/3748
  44. 44.
    Pulz O, Scheibenbogen K (1998) Photobioreactors: design and performance with respect to light energy input. Bioprocess Algae React Technol Apoptosis 59:123–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0102298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Quinn NWT, Leighton T, Lundquist TJ et al (2008) Algal-bacterial treatment facility removes selenium from drainage water. Calif Agric 54:50–56.  https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v054n06p50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rawat I, Gupta SK, Shriwastav A, Singh P, BF KS (2016) Microalgae Applications in Wastewater Treatment. In: Bux F, Chisti Y (eds) Algae biotechnology products and processes. Green energy and technology. Springer International Publishing, ChamGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rich GW (2001) Low maintenance—mechanically simple wastewater treatment systems for developing and developed countries. In: Proceedings of the water environment federationGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sen B, Tahir M, Sonmez F et al (2013) Relationship of Algae to Water Pollution and Waste Water Treatment. Water Treatment, In.  https://doi.org/10.5772/51927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Staples CA, Dom PB, Klecka GM et al (1998) A review of the environmental fate, effects, and exposures of bisphenol A. Chemosphere 36:2149–2173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(97)10133-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Su Y (2012) Settleable algal-bacterial culture for municipal wastewater treatment.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Su Y, Mennerich A, Urban B (2012) Coupled nutrient removal and biomass production with mixed algal culture: impact of biotic and abiotic factors. Bioresour Technol 118:469–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ting YP, Lawson F, Prince IG (1989) Uptake of Cadmium and Zinc by the alga Chlorella vulgaris: part 1. Individual ion species. Biotechnol Bioeng 34:990–999.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260340713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tiron O, Bumbac C, Postolache C (2014) Microalgae bacteria system for biological Wastewater treatment. J Environ Prot Ecol 15:268–276Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    West L (2006) World water day: a billion people worldwide lack safe drinking water. In: WikipediaGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wikfors G, Ukeles R (1982) Growth and adaptation of estuarine unicellular algae in media with excess copper, cadmium or zinc, and effects of metal-contaminated algal food on Crassostrea virginica larvae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:191–206.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps007191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zeng RJ, Yuan Z, Keller J (2003) Enrichment of denitrifying glycogen-accumulating organisms in anaerobic/anoxic activated sludge system. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:397–404.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kalpana Sahoo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajesh Kumar Sahoo
    • 1
  • Mahendra Gaur
    • 1
  • Enketeswara Subudhi
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomics & Biodiversity Laboratory, Centre for BiotechnologySiksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)BhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations