Algal Biofuel: Still Not a Common Man’s Fuel?
The rapid lifestyle of industrialization and increasing demand of fossil oil that are going to be scarce in future date have led to think the alternative source of renewable energy as fuels to meet our energy demands. Fossil fuel is challenged with increasing price and a decreasing quantity, and burning of the fuels is putting the environment into threat toward pollution and global warming. Various steps toward cultivating oil crops such as Jatropha, corn, coconut, soybean, and oil palm have been encouraged, but productivity of oil has been very less, i.e., 5% of total biomass, and it needs vast acres of cultivated land. Therefore, to overcome the problem, today’s world is moving toward microalgae cultivation, which in comparison can grow faster in wastelands/uncultivated lands and can produce up to 80% of the dry weight of algae biomass. Microalgae are phototrophic and are able to transform carbon dioxide into biofuels, valuable bioactive compounds, foods, and feeds. In spite of all positivity, microalgae biofuel is still not common man’s fuel due to various hurdles. Overhead harvesting cost is 20–30% higher to the cultivation cost of algae; it can reduce the nonrenewable resources (nitrogen, phosphorus) for which still date it cannot reach to common man. However, limited supply of these renewable oils and high cost stop it to be a potential challenger in the face of other petroleum-based fuels. Overall, economic feasibility and environmental suitability cannot be forgotten when venturing into scaling up for future commercialization.
KeywordsAlgal biofuel Cost-effective Toxic pollutants Nonrenewable resources
- 3.International Energy Outlook 2013 (2013) International Energy Outlook 2013 (IEO2013), released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Published: July 25, 2013. [Internet] http://susris.com/2013/07/25/international-energy-outlook-2013/
- 4.Parry ML (2007) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group II, World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme. Summary for Policymakers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 11.Singh A, Nigam PS, Murphy JD (2010a) Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. Bioresour Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.032
- 14.Carlsson A, Beilen van J, Möller R, Clayton D, Bowles DE (2007) Micro-and macroalgae – utility for industrial applications Bioproducts, E. R. t. E. P. o. S. R.-. and Crops, f. N.-f., CNAP, University of York: 86Google Scholar
- 20.Wigmosta MS, Coleman AM, Skaggs RJ, Huesemann MH, Lane LJ (2011) National microalgae biofuel production potential and resource demand. Water Resour Res 47. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009966
- 27.Metz B, Davidson O, De Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (2005) Carbon capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 29.Becker EW (1994) Microalgae: biotechnology and microbiology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 31.Alabi AO, Tampier M, Bibeau E (2009) Microalgae technologies and processes for biofuels/bioenergy production in British Columbia. BC Innovation Council, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- 33.U.S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy (DOE) crude oil estimates/statistics: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/reserves.html; http://www.eia.doe.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=oil_home#tab2; http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_cons_psup_dc_nus_mbbl_a.htm