Advertisement

Mobilizing Alternative Modes of Cultural Governance in Berlin

  • Friederike Landau
  • Janet Merkel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores how political actors constitute themselves and how they intervene in existing urban governance arrangements to enact alternative visions of social and cultural urban development. It draws on empirical studies from Berlin where artists and independent cultural producers have been carving out a space for themselves in governance arrangements to shape alternative ideas of Berlin’s future. Identifying the actor constellations and the resources they mobilize through a lens of conflict and consensus reveals the mechanisms through which stakeholders contested and (re)appropriated the politicized rhetoric of the ‘Creative City.’ The chapter demonstrates how collectivization efforts of cultural workers have differently (re)shaped the political opportunity structures in place to influence and intervene in Berlin’s urban cultural and creative politics.

Keywords

Creative city Governance Cultural and creative industries Berlin Agonism Urban politics 

References

  1. Andres, L., & Chapain, C. (2013). The Integration of Cultural and Creative Industries into Local and Regional Development Strategies in Birmingham and Marseille: Towards an Inclusive and Collaborative Governance? Regional Studies, 47(2), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anheier, H., & Isar, Y. R. (Eds.). (2012). Cities, Cultural Policy and Governance. The Cultures and Globalization Series 5. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2010). Beyond the “Toolkit Approach”: Arts Impact Evaluation Research and the Realities of Cultural Policy-Making. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(2), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernt, M., Grell, B., & Holm, A. (Eds.). (2013). The Berlin Reader. A Compendium on Urban Change and Activism. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  6. Bevir, M. (Ed.). (2010). The Sage Handbook of Governance. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Borén, T., & Young, C. (2013). Getting Creative with the ‘Creative City’? Towards New Perspectives on Creativity in Urban Policy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1799–1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colomb, C. (2012). Staging the New Berlin. Place Marketing and the Politics of Urban Reinvention Post-1989. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, J. S. (2007). The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion. Political Studies, 55(4), 779–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies, J. S. (2011). Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzudzek, I., & Lindner, P. (2013). Performing the Creative-Economy Script: Contradicting Urban Rationalities at Work. Regional Studies, 49(3), 388–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2004). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, C. (2007). Commodification and Instrumentality in Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grésillon, B. (1999). Berlin, Cultural Metropolis: Changes in the Cultural Geography of Berlin since Reunification. Cultural Geographies, 6(3), 284–294.Google Scholar
  15. Grodach, C. (2011). Before and after the Creative City: The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy in Austin Texas. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(1), 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grodach, C. (2013). Cultural Economy Planning in Creative Cities: Discourse and Practice. International Journal or Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1747–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grodach, C. (2017). Urban Cultural Policy and Creative City Making, Cities, 68, 82–91.Google Scholar
  18. Grodach, C., & Silver, D. (Eds.). (2013). The Politics of Urban Cultural Policy. Global Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hesmondhalgh, D., & Pratt, A. C. (2005). Cultural Industries and Cultural Policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutton, T. A. (2008). The New Economy of the Inner City: Restructuring, Regeneration and Dislocation in the 21st Century Metropolis. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration. Human Relations, 53(6), 771–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Indergaard, M. (2009). What to Make of New York’s New Economy? The Politics of the Creative Field. Urban Studies, 46(5–6), 1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kearns, G., & Philo, C. (Eds.). (1993). Selling Places. Oxford, New York, Seoul and Tokyo: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Krätke, S. (2011). The Creative Capital of Cities. Interactive Knowledge Creation and the Urbanization Economies of Innovation. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landau, F. (2015). Tagging the City: Berlin’s Independent Scene Rising for a City Tax for the Arts. edgeCONDITION Special Issue Placemaking, 1, 118–121.Google Scholar
  27. Landau, F. (2016). Articulations in Berlin’s Independent Art Scene. On New Collective Actors in the Art Field. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(9/10), 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landau, F. (2017a). Diversifying the Stage of Policymaking—A New Policy Network in Berlin’s Cultural Field. In J. Luger & J. Ren (Eds.), Art and the City. Worlding the Discussion through a Critical Artscape (pp. 72–86). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Landau, F. (2017b). Unpacking Conflictual Consensus in Berlin’s Cultural Policy-Making. In S. Ada (Ed.), Independent Republic of Culture (pp. 28–36). Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Landau, F. (forthcoming). Agonistic Articulations in the ‘Creative’ City: On New Actors and Activism in Berlin’s Cultural Politics. In process of publication.Google Scholar
  31. Landry, C. (2000). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Leslie, D., & Catungal, J. P. (2012). Social Justice and the Creative City: Class, Gender and Racial Inequalities. Geography Compass, 6(3), 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Arts and Culture in Urban or Regional Planning: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCann, E. (2017). Governing Urbanism: Urban Governance Studies 1.0, 2.0 and Beyond. Urban Studies, 54(2), 312–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McLean, H. E. (2014a). Cracks in the Creative City: The Contradictions of Community Arts Practice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2156–2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McLean, H. E. (2014b). Digging into the Creative City: A Feminist Critique. Antipode, 46(3), 669–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merkel, J. (2012). ‘Creative Governance’ in Berlin? In H. Anheier & Y. R. Isar (Eds.), Cultures and Globalization: Cities, Cultural Policy and Governance (pp. 160–166). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Merkel, J. (2014). Kreativität Und Stadt. Zu Rolle, Wirkung Und Form Privat-Öffentlicher Kooperation in Der Stadt. PhD dissertation, Edoc Server Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin.Google Scholar
  39. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  40. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  41. Mould, O. (2015). Urban Subversion and the Creative City. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor, J., & Gu, X. (2010). Developing a Creative Cluster in a Postindustrial City: Cids and Manchester. Information Society, 26(2), 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Connor, J., & Shaw, K. (2014). What Next for the Creative City? City, Culture and Society, 5(3), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the Creative Class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peck, J. (2007, June 28). The Creativity Fix. Eurozine. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.eurozine.com/the-creativity-fix/
  46. Ponzini, D., & Rossi, U. (2010). Becoming a Creative City: The Entrepreneurial Mayor, Network Politics and the Promise of an Urban Renaissance. Urban Studies, 47(5), 1037–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pratt, A. (2010). Creative Cities: Tensions within and between Social, Cultural and Economic Development. A Critical Reading of the UK Experience. City, Culture and Society, 1(1), 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pratt, A. (2012). The Cultural and Creative Industries: Organisational and Spatial Challenges to Their Governance. Die Erde, 143(4), 317–334.Google Scholar
  49. Projekt Zukunft. (2015). Projekt Zukunft. Retrieved September 25, 2017, from http://www.berlin.de/projektzukunft/en/
  50. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Scharenberg, A., & Bader, I. (2009). Berlin's Waterfront Site Struggle. City, 13(2–3), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott, A. J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senatskanzlei. (2015). Kulturhaushalt 2010–2015. Berlin: Senatskanzlei—Kulturelle Angelegenheiten. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from http://www.berlin.de/sen/kultur/_assets/kulturpolitik/kulturetat_2010-2015.pdf
  55. SenWAF and SenWFK. (2005). Kulturwirtschaft in Berlin. Entwicklungen Und Potenziale. Berlin Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Frauen und Senatsverwaltung für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kultur. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from https://www.berlin.de/sen/kultur/_assets/kulturpolitik/kuwi_0706.pdf
  56. SenWTF. (2014). 3. Kreativwirtschaftsbericht Berlin: Entwicklungen Und Potenziale. Berlin: Gemeinsam herausgegeben von Senatsverwaltung für Wirtschaft, Technologie und Forschung, Der Regierende Bürgermeister von Berlin, Senatskanzlei—Kulturelle Angelegenheiten und Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.berlin.de/sen/wirtschaft/wirtschaft-und-technologie/branchen/ikt-medien-kreativwirtschaft/3-kreativwirtschaftsbericht/
  57. Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-Beyond-the-State. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trip, J. J., & Romein, A. (2014). Creative City Policy and the Gap with Theory. European Planning Studies, 22(12), 2490–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Woddis, J. (2013). Arts Practitioners in the Cultural Policy Process: Spear-Carriers or Speaking Parts? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(4), 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yin, R. K. (2015). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Metropolitan StudiesTechnical University of BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of SociologyCity, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations